Political and sociocultural events (e.g., Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 and the German reunification in 1989) and natural disasters (e.g., Hurricane Hugo in 1989) can affect fertility. In our research, we addressed the question of whether the Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995, a man-made disaster, influenced fertility patterns in Oklahoma. We defined three theoretical orientations—replacement theory, community influence theory, and terror management theory—that motivate a general expectation of birth increases, with different predictions emerging from time and geographic considerations. We used two different empirical methodologies. First, we fitted dummy-variable regression models to monthly birth data from 1990 to 1999 in metropolitan counties. We used birth counts to frame the problem and general fertility rates to address the problem formally. These analyses were organized within two design structures: a control-group interrupted time-series design and a difference-in-differences design. In these analyses, Oklahoma County showed an interpretable, consistent, and significant increase in births. Second, we used graphical smoothing models to display these effects visually. In combination, these methods provide compelling support for a fertility response to the Oklahoma City bombing. Certain parts of each theory helped us organize and understand the pattern of results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
“Baby Miniboom Following New York Terrorist Attack.” May 27, 2002. New York Daily News, p. 2B. “Baylee Almon’s Mom Expecting Another Child.” April 5, 2000. Daily Oklahoman, p. 4A.
Becker, G.S. 1960. “An Economic Analysis of Fertility.” Pp. 209–31 in Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. NBER Conference Series 11. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bertrand, M., E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan. 2004. “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119:249–75.
Bongaarts, J. and G. Feeney. 1998. “On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility.” Population and Development Review 24:271–92.
Brunvand, J.H. 1993. The Baby Train and Other Lusty Urban Legends. New York: W.W. Norton.
Cohan, S.L. and S.W. Cole. 2002. “Life Course Transitions and Natural Disasters: Marriage, Birth, and Divorce Following Hurricane Hugo.” Journal of Family Psychology 16:14–25.
Conrad, C., M. Lechner, and W. Werner. 1996. “East German Fertility After Unification: Crisis or Adaptation?” Population and Development Review 22:331–58.
Cook, T.D. and D.T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Cromwell, J.B., W.C. Labys, and M. Terraza. 1994. Univariate Tests for Time Series Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davis, K. 1963. “The Theory of Change and Response in Modern Demographic History.” Population Index 29:345–66.
Easterlin, R.A. 1978. “The Economics and Sociology of Fertility: A Synthesis.” Pp. 57–133 in Historical Studies of Changing Fertility, edited by C. Tilly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Garrison, D. September 15, 2003. “September Poem.” New Yorker, pp. 68–69.
Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, J. Smith, and P. Todd. 1998. “Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data.” Econometrica 66:1017–98.
Hirschman, C. 1994. “Why Fertility Changes.” Annual Review of Sociology 20:203–33.
Knodel, J. and E. van de Walle. 1979. “Lessons From the Past: Policy Implications of Historical Fertility Studies.” Population and Development Review 5:217–45.
Lam, D.A. and J. Miron. 1996. “The Effect of Temperature on Human Fertility.” Demography 33:291–306.
Lechner, M. 2001. “The Empirical Analysis of East German Fertility After Unification: An Update.” European Journal of Population 17:61–74.
Lesthaeghe, R. 1983. “A Century of Demographic Change in Western Europe: An Exploration of Underlying Dimensions.” Population and Development Review 9:411–36.
Nakonezny, P., J.L. Rodgers, and P. Reddick. 2004. “Did Divorces Decline After the Oklahoma City Bombing?” Journal of Marriage and the Family 66:90–100.
“No Sign of Post-September 11 Baby Boom.” July 22, 2002. MSNBC Online.
Notestein, F. 1945. “Population—The Long View.” Pp. 36–57 in Food for the World, edited by T.W. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ostram, C.W. 1978. Time Series Analysis: Regression Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rindfuss, R.R., J.S. Reed, and C. St. John. 1978. “A Fertility Reaction to a Historical Event: Southern White Birthrates and the 1954 Desegregation Ruling.” Science 201:178–80.
Rodgers, J.L. and J.R. Udry. 1988. “The Season-of-Birth Paradox.” Social Biology 35:171–85.
Seiver, D.A. 1985. “Trend and Variation in the Seasonality of U.S. Fertility.” Demography 22: 89–100.
Serrano, R. July 10, 1999. “Murrah Bomb’s Toll.” Oklahoma Observer, p. 1.
Shadish, W.R., T.D. Cook, and D.T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Solomon, S., J. Greenberg, and T. Pyszczynski. 2000. “Pride and Prejudice: Fear of Death and Social Behavior.” Current Directions in Psychological Research 9:200–204.
Udry, J.R. 1970. “The Effect of the Great Blackout of 1965 on Births in New York City.” Demography 7:325–27.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodgers, J.L., John, C.A.S. & Coleman, R. Did fertility go up after the oklahoma city bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma, 1990–1999. Demography 42, 675–692 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0034
- Oklahoma City
- Metropolitan County
- Fertility Response
- Terror Management Theory
- Bombing Effect