Skip to main content
Log in

Wives who outearn their husbands: A transitory or persistent phenomenon for couples?

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

In what percentage of married couples do wives outearn their husbands, and, moreover, how persistent are these patterns? This study systematically examined variation in point-in-time estimates across alternative measures of earnings, definitions of types of couples, and data sources and gauged the persistence of these patterns for a period of three calendar years using data from the 2000 Current Population Survey and the 1996–2000 Survey of Income and Program Participation. Among the findings are that in 19% to 30% of all married couples, wives have higher earnings than their husbands. In 60% of such couples, this arrangement persists over the three-year period; for the rest, this arrangement is transitory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bittman, M., P. England, N. Folbre, L. Sayer, and G. Matheson. 2003. “When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work.” American Journal of Sociology 109: 186–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, R. and M. Tolbert Coleman. 1989. “A Theoretical Look at the Gender Balance of Power in the American Couple.” Journal of Family Issues 10:225–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R.T., R. Chait Barnett, and K.C. Gareis. 2001. “When She Earns More Than He Does: A Longitudinal Study of Dual-Earner Couples.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 63:168–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. 1994. “Economic Dependency, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home.” American Journal of Sociology 100:652–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butrica, B.A., H.M. Iams, and S.H. Sandell. 1999. “Using Data for Couples to Project the Distributional Effects of Changes in Social Security Policy.” Social Security Bulletin 62(3):2–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, N.G. 1999. “Racial Differences in the Contribution of Wife’s Earnings to Family Income Distribution.” Journal of Poverty 3(3):33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B. 2000. “The Feminization of Work in the U.S.: A New Era for (Man)kind?” Pp. 3–22 in Gender and the Labor Market: Econometric Evidence on Obstacles in Achieving Gender Equality, edited by S. Gustafsson and D. Meulders. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayghe, H.V. 1993. “Working Wives’ Contributions to Family Incomes.” Monthly Labor Review 116(8):39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, J.C. 1986. “The Provider Role: Its Meaning and Measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family 48:349–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juhn, C., K.M. Murphy, and R. Topel. 2002. “Current Unemployment, Historically Contemplated.” Prepared for the Brookings Panel on Economic Activity, April 4–5.

  • Lerman, R.I. 1997. “Is Earnings Inequality Really Increasing?” Policy brief. No. 1 in Series, Economic Restructuring and the Job Market. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S.J., R.A. Pollak, and T.J. Wales. 1997. “Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources?” Journal of Human Resources 32:463–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. 2001. “The Marriages of Equally Dependent Spouses.” Journal of Family Issues 22: 755–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. Kincade. 1997. “Women’s Employment and the Gain to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:431–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raley, S.B., M.J. Mattingly, and S.M. Bianchi. Forthcoming. “How Dual Are Dual-Income Couples? Documenting Change From 1970 to 2001.” Journal of Marriage and the Family.

  • Roemer, M.I. 2000. “Assessing the Quality of the March Current Population Survey and the Survey of Income and Program Participation Income Estimates, 1990–1996.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, L. and S.M. Bianchi. 2000. “Women’s Economic Independence and the Probability of Divorce.” Journal of Family Issues 21:906–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T.P. 1997. “Demand for Children in Low Income Countries.” Chap. 6 in Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Volume 1A, edited by M.R. Rosenzweig and O. Stark. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, A. and S. McLanahan. 1987. “Married Women’s Economic Dependency.” American Journal of Sociology 93:659–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, L.S. 2001. “Why Does More Housework Lower Women’s Wages? Testing Hypotheses Involving Job Effort and Hours Flexibility.” Social Science Quarterly 82:67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weismantle, M. 2001. “Reasons People Do Not Work.” Current Population Reports P70–76. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. “Historical Income Tables—Families.” Table F-22. Available on-line at http://hhes/income/histinc/f22.html

  • Winkler, A.E. 1998. “Earnings of Husbands and Wives in Dual-Earner Families.” Monthly Labor Review (April):42–48.

  • Winkler, A.E. and D.C. Rose. 2000. “Career Hierarchy in Dual-Earner Families.” Pp. 147–72 in Research in Labor Economics, edited by S. Polachek. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are grateful for comments from Julie Brines, Marianne Ferber, Howard Iams, Robert Pollak, anonymous referees of this journal, the editors, and participants at the Washington University in St. Louis seminar series on Work, Family, and Public Policy. The authors acknowledge support from the University of Missouri Research Board for this project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkler, A.E., McBride, T.D. & Andrews, C. Wives who outearn their husbands: A transitory or persistent phenomenon for couples?. Demography 42, 523–535 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0028

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0028

Keywords

Navigation