Skip to main content

The importance of education-occupation matching in migration decisions

Abstract

In this article, we present and test a model that incorporates education-occupation matching into the migration decision. The literature on education-occupation matching shows that earnings are affected by how individuals’ education matches that required by their occupation. Accordingly, individuals with more schooling than required by their occupation have an additional incentive to migrate: the increase in earnings that occurs with a more beneficial education-occupation match. Using data from Mexico, we found statistical support for the importance of education-occupation matching in migration decisions. Education-occupation matching provides a plausible explanation for the mixed findings in the literature on the relationship between educational attainment and migration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adams, Jr., R.H. 1993. “The Economic and Demographic Determinants of International Migration in Rural Egypt.” Journal of Development Studies 30:146–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba-Ramirez, A. 1993. “Mismatch in the Spanish Labor Market?” Journal of Human Resources 28:259–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. and R. van der Velden. 2001. “Educational Mismatches Versus Skill Mismatches: Effects on Wages, Job Satisfaction, and On-the-Job Search.” Oxford Economic Papers 3:434–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of International Medical Graduates. 2003. Factoids for International Medical Students. Available on-line at ww.aaimg.com/factoids/index/html

  • American Bar Association. 2003. Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2003 Edition. Available on-line at www.abanet.org/legaled/publications/compguide2003/

  • Banerjee, B. 1991. “The Determinants of Migrating With a Pre-Arranged Job and of the Initial Duration of Urban Employment: An Analysis Based on Indian Data on Rural-to-Urban Migrants.” Journal of Development Economics 36:337–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caces, F., F. Arnold, J.T. Fawcett, and R.W. Gardner. 1985. “Shadow Households and Competing Auspices.” Journal of Development Economics 17:5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D. and M. Hills. 1993. Statistical Models in Epidemiology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, E., E. Johnson, and Y.C. Ng. 2000. “The Incidence of Overschooling and Underschooling and Its Effect on Earnings in the United States and Hong Kong.” Research in Labor Economics 19:29–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, E. and S. Khan. 1995. “The Wage Effects of Overschooling Revisited.” Labour Economics 2(1):67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, S. and E. Rivero-Fuentes. 2003. “Engendering Migrant Networks: The Case of Mexican Migration.” Demography 40:289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docquier, F. and H. Rapoport. 1998. “Are Migrant Minorities Strategically Self-Selected?” Journal of Population Economics 11:579–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M.E. 1989. “Migratory Labor and Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71:617–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Pompa, A. 1989. The Challenge: Latinos in a Changing California. Report of the University of California SCR 43 Task Force. Oakland: Regents of the University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1995. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. 2002. Econometric Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, J. 2000. “Overeducation and Earnings: Where Are We, Where Should We Go?” Economics of Education Review 19:131–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47:153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennekens, C.H. and J.E. Buring. 1987. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). 2001. Statistical Yearbook 2001. Washington, DC: INS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker, B.F., M.C. Santos, and M.M. De Oliveira. 1997. “Overeducation and Undereducation: Evidence for Portugal.” Economics of Education Review 16:111–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E.B. 1985. “Migration Amongst the Botswana.” Economic Journal 95(378):358–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. 1990. “Social Structure, Household Strategies and the Cumulative Causation of Migration.” Population Index 56(1):2–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S., J. Arango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, and J.E. Taylor. 1994. “An Evaluation of International Migration Theory: The North American Case.” Population and Development Review 20:699–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. and K.E. Espinosa. 1997. “What’s Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 102:939–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mexican Migration Project. 1982–1999 Data Files and Codebooks. Princeton University Population Center and the University of Guadalajara.

  • Mortensen, D. and T. Vishwanath. 1994. “Personal Contacts and Earnings: It Is Who You Know!” Labour Economics 1:187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Y.C. 2001. “Overeducation and Undereducation and Their Effect on Earnings: Evidence From Hong Kong, 1986–1996.” Pacific Economic Review 6:401–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, P. and R. Morales. 1988. “Mexican Labor in Los Angeles.” Conference on Comparative Ethnicity: The Conference Papers, June 1988. Working Paper No. 7. Institute for Social Science Research, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paral, R. 2002. “Mexican Immigrant Workers and the U.S. Economy: An Increasingly Vital Role.” Immigration Policy Focus. American Immigration Law Foundation 1(2):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M.A. Forthcoming. “Relative Deprivation, Wage Differentials and Mexican Migration.” Review of Development Economics.

  • Robst, J. 1995. “Career Mobility, Job Match, and Overeducation.” Eastern Economic Journal 21:539–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K.J. and S. Greenland. 1998. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubb, S. 2003a. “Overeducation in the Labour Market: A Comment and Re-analysis of a Metaanalysis.” Economics of Education Review 22:621–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003b. “Post-College Schooling, Overeducation, and Hourly Earnings in the United States.” Education Economics 11(1):53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubb, S. and M.A. Quinn. 2002. “Educational Mismatches in Mexico: Additional Evidence of the Importance of Labor Market Assignments?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Atlantic Economic Society, October 11–13, Washington, DC.

  • Rumberger, R.W. 1987. “The Impact of Surplus Schooling on Productivity and Earnings.” Journal of Human Resources 22(1):24–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahota, G. 1968. “An Econometric Analysis of Internal Migration in Brazil.” Journal of Political Economy 76:218–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicherman, N. 1991. “Overeducation in the Labor Market.” Journal of Labor Economics 9:101–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicherman, N. and O. Galor. 1990. “A Theory of Career Mobility.” Journal of Political Economy 98(1):169–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O. 1991. The Migration of Labor. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O and J.E. Taylor. 1989. “Relative Deprivation and International Migration.” Demography 26:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991. “Migration Incentives, Migration Types: The Role of Relative Deprivation.” Economic Journal 101:408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.E. 1987. “Undocumented Mexico-U.S. Migration and the Returns to Households in Rural Mexico.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69:626–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.E. and T.J. Wyatt. 1996. “The Shadow Value of Migrant Remittances, Income and Inequality in a Household-Farm Economy.” Journal of Development Studies 32:899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.E. and A. Yunez-Naude. 1999. Education, Migration and Productivity: An Analytic Approach and Evidence From Rural Mexico. Paris: Development Centre of the OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, M. and H. Levin. 1985. “The Economics of Overeducation.” Economics of Education Review 4(1):93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2001. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2001 Revision. New York: United Nations Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. International Migration Report. New York: United Nations Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. The Foreign-born Population in the United States. Available on-line at http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/foreign.html

  • Verdugo, R.R. and N.T. Verdugo. 1989. “The Impact of Surplus Schooling on Wages.” Journal of Human Resources 24:629–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, R. and M. Bozorgmehr, eds. 1996. Ethnic Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2002. World Development Indicators 2002. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quinn, M.A., Rubb, S. The importance of education-occupation matching in migration decisions. Demography 42, 153–167 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0008

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0008

Keywords

  • Educational Attainment
  • Statistical Support
  • Mixed Finding
  • Migration Decision
  • Additional Incentive