Abstract
The problem of determining cause and effect is one of the oldest in the social sciences, where laboratory experimentation is generally not possible. This article provides a perspective on the analysis of causal relationships in population research that draws upon recent discussions of this issue in the field of economics. Within economics, thinking about causal estimation has shifted dramatically in the past decade toward a more pessimistic reading of what is possible and a retreat in the ambitiousness of claims of causal determination. In this article, the framework that underlies this conclusion is presented, the central identification problem is discussed in detail, and examples from the field of population research are given. Some of the more important aspects of this framework are related to the problem of the variability of causal effects for different individuals; the relationships among structural forms, reduced forms, and knowledge of mechanisms; the problem of internal versus external validity and the related issue of extrapolation; and the importance of theory and outside evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, P., M. Hurd, D. McFadden, A. Merrill, and T. Ribeiro. 2003. “Healthy, Wealthy, and Wise? Tests for Direct Causal Paths Between Health and Socioeconomic Status.” Journal of Econometrics 112:3–56.
Angrist, J., G. Imbens, and D. Rubin. 1996. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91:444–55.
Angrist, J. and A. Krueger. 1991. “Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:979–1014.
Björklund, A. and R. Moffitt. 1987. “Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-Selection Models.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69:42–49.
Bound, J., D. Jaeger, and R. Baker. 1995. “Problems With Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable Is Weak.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:443–50.
Bound, J. and G. Solon. 1999. “Double Trouble: On the Value of Twins-Based Estimation of the Return to Schooling.” Economics of Education Review 18:169–82.
Duncan, G., K. Magnuson, and J. Ludwig. 2003. “The Endogeneity Problem in Developmental Studies.” Mimeographed. Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Fricke, T. 2003. “Culture and Causality: An Anthropological Comment.” Population and Development Review 29:470–79.
Geronimus, A. and S. Korenman. 1992. “The Socioeconomic Consequences of Teen Childbearing Reconsidered.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:1187–214.
Geronimus, A., S. Korenman, and M. Hillemeier. 1994. “Does Maternal Age Adversely Affect Child Development? Evidence From Cousin Comparisons in the United States.” Population and Development Review 20:585–609.
Grogger, J. and S. Bronars. 1993. “The Socioeconomic Consequences of Teen Childbearing: Findings From a Natural Experiment.” Family Planning Perspectives 25:156–61.
Haavelmo, T. 1943. “The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations.” Econometrica 11:1–12.
— 1944. “The Probability Approach in Econometrics.” Econometrica 12(Suppl.):1–115.
Heckman, J. 1978. “Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System.” Econometrica 46:931–60.
— 2000. “Causal Parameters and Policy Analysis in Economics: A Twentieth Century Retrospective.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115:45–97.
— 2004. “The Scientific Model of Causality.” Mimeographed. Department of Economics, University of Chicago.
Heckman, J. and S. Navarro-Lozano. 2004. “Using Matching, Instrumental Variables and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 30–57.
Heckman, J. and R. Robb. 1985. “Alternative Models for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions.” Pp. 156–245 in Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, edited by J. Heckman and B. Singer. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Heckman, J. and E. Vytlacil. 1999. “Local Instrumental Variables and Latent Variable Models for Identifying and Bounding Treatment Effects.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:4730–34.
— 2001. “Policy-Relevant Treatment Effects.” American Economic Review 91: 107–11.
Heckman, J. and E. Vytlacil. Forthcoming. “The Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs.” In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 6, edited by J. Heckman and E. Leamer. New York: Elsevier.
Hoffman, S., E.M. Foster, and F. Furstenberg. 1993. “Re-evaluating the Costs of Teenage Childbearing.” Demography 30:1–13.
Holland, P. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81:945–60.
Hotz, V.J., S. McElroy, and S. Sanders. 1997. “The Impacts of Teenage Childbearing on the Mothers and the Consequences of Those Impacts for the Government.” Pp. 55–94 in Kids Having Kids: Economic Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy, edited by R. Maynard. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Hotz, V.J., C. Mullin, and S. Sanders. 1997. “Bounding Causal Effects Using Data From a Contaminated Natural Experiment: Analysing the Effect of Teenage Childbearing.” Review of Economic Studies 64:575–603.
Imbens, G. and J. Angrist. 1994. “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 62:467–76.
Kelley, A. and J. Williamson. 1984. What Drives Third World City Growth? A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Krueger, A. and J.-S. Pischke. 1992. “The Effect of Social Security on Labor Supply: A Cohort Analysis of the Notch Generation.” Journal of Labor Economics 10:412–37.
Kuznets, S. 1966. Modern Economic Growth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Manski, C. 1995. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Maynard, R., ed. 1997. Kids Having Kids: Economic Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” Pp. 105–42 in Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press.
Moffitt, R. 1991. “Program Evaluation With Nonexperimental Data.” Evaluation Review 15: 291–314.
—. 2003. “Causal Analysis in Population Research: An Economist’s Perspective.” Population and Development Review 29:448–58.
Neyman, J. 1923. “On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles.” Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 10:1–51 [in Polish], English translation of Section 9 by D.M. Dabrowska and T.P. Speed (1990), Statistical Science 9:465-80.
— 1935. “Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation.” Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 2:107–80.
Quandt, R. 1972. “Methods for Estimating Switching Regressions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 67:306–10.
Robins, J.M. 1999. “Association, Causation, and Marginal Structural Models”. Synthese 121: 151–79.
Rosenbaum, P. 1995. Observational Studies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rosenzweig, M. and K. Wolpin. 2000. “Natural ‘Natural Experiments’ in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 38:827–74.
Roy, A. 1951. “Some Thoughts on the Distribution of Earnings.” Oxford Economic Papers 3: 135–46.
Rubin, D. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66:688–701.
— 1978. “Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects.” Annals of Statistics 6:34–58.
Schultz, T.P. 1985. “Changing World Prices, Women’s Wages, and the Fertility Transition: Sweden 1860–1910.” Journal of Political Economy 93:1126–54.
Smith, H. 2003. “Some Thoughts on Causation as It Relates to Demography and Population Studies.” Population and Development Review 29:459–69.
Stock, J., J. Wright, and M. Yogo. 2002. “A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20:518–29.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1995. Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Winship, C. and S. Morgan. 1999. “The Estimation of Causal Effects From Observational Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 25:659–706
Wu, L. and B. Wolfe, eds. 2001. Out of Wedlock: The Causes and Consequences of Nonmarital Fertility. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A previous version of this article, titled “Causal and Non-Causal Research in Population: An Economist’s Perspective,” was presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the Population Association of America, May 1-3, Minneapolis. The author thanks Chris Bachrach, Greg Duncan, Tom Fricke, Geoffrey McNicoll, Herb Smith, and two anonymous referees for their helpful discussions and comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moffitt, R. Remarks on the analysis of causal relationships in population research. Demography 42, 91–108 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0006
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0006