We used metropolitan-level data from the 2000 U.S. census to analyze the hypersegregation of four groups from whites: blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Native Americans. While blacks were hypersegregated in 29 metropolitan areas and Hispanics were hypersegregated in 2, Asians and Native Americans were not hypersegregated in any. There were declines in the number of metropolitan areas with black hypersegregation, although levels of segregation experienced by blacks remained significantly higher than those of the other groups, even after a number of factors were controlled. Indeed, although socioeconomic differences among the groups explain some of the difference in residential patterns more generally, they have little association with hypersegregation in particular, indicating the overarching salience of race in shaping residential patterns in these highly divided metropolitan areas.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Denton, N. 1994. “Are African Americans Still Hypersegregated?” Pp. 49–81 in Residential Apartheid: The American Legacy, edited by R. Bullard, C. Lee, and J.E. Grigsby. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Afro-American Studies.Google Scholar
- Frey, W.H. and D. Myers. 2002. “Neighborhood Segregation in Single-Race and Multirace America: A Census 2000 Study in Cities and Metropolitan Areas.” Working Paper. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.Google Scholar
- Glaeser, E.L. and J. Vigdor. 2001. “Racial Segregation in the 2000 Census: Promising News.” Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institution. Available on-line at http://www.brook.edu/es/urban/census/glaeser.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Gotham, K.F. 1998. “Race, Mortgage Lending and Loan Rejections in a U.S. City.” Sociological Focus 31:391–405.Google Scholar
- Grieco, E. and R.C. Cassidy. 2001. Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2000. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Brief C2KBR/01-1, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Iceland, J., D.H. Weinberg, and E. Steinmetz. 2002. Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation in the United States: 1980–2000. U.S. Census Bureau, Census Special Report, CENSR-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Lewis Mumford Center, University at Albany. 2001. “Ethnic Diversity Grows, Neighborhood Integration Lags Behind.” Available on-line at http://mumford1.dyndns.org/cen2000/WholePop/ WPreport/MumfordReport.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Logan, J. 2001. “The New Ethnic Enclaves in America’s Suburbs.” Report by the Lewis Mumford Center, University at Albany. Available on-line at http://mumford1.dyndns.org/cen2000/suburban/ SuburbanReport/page1.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Logan, J. and R.D. Alba. 1995. “Who Lives in Affluent Suburbs? Racial Differences in Eleven Metropolitan Regions.” Sociological Focus 28:353–64.Google Scholar
- Massey, D.S. 2001. “Residential Segregation and Neighborhood Conditions in U.S. Metropolitan Areas.” Pp. 389–482 in America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences, edited by N. Smelser, W.J. Wilson, and F. Mitchell. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- —. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, A., S. Friedman, I. Cheung, and M. Price. 2001. “The World in a Zip Code: Greater Washington, D.C. as a New Region of Immigration.” Policy Report. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Available on-line at http://www.brook.edu/es/urban/immigration/zipcode.htmGoogle Scholar
- St. John, C. and R. Clymer. 2000. “Racial Residential Segregation by Level of Socioeconomic Status.” Social Science Quarterly 81:701–15.Google Scholar
- Wilkes, R. 2003. “The Residential Segregation of Native Americans in U.S. Metropolitan Areas.” Sociological Focus 36:127–41.Google Scholar