Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 479–497 | Cite as

Welfare work requirements and child well-being: Evidence from the effects on breast-feeding

  • Steven J. Haider
  • Alison Jacknowitz
  • Robert F. Schoeni
Article

Abstract

A central theme of welfare reform is that recipients are required to engage in work activities. In many states, these work requirements apply to mothers whose children are a few months old, which may increase the costs and decrease the prevalence of breast-feeding. Given the substantial benefits of breast-feeding, any reduction represents an important negative consequence of these requirements. Our results suggest that in the absence of welfare reform, the national breast-feeding rate six months after birth would have been 5.5% higher in 2000. Such negative consequences of these policies must be weighed against potential benefits as states refine their welfare programs.

Keywords

Welfare Reform Welfare Policy Work Requirement Welfare Caseload Sanction Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. 1997. “Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk.” Pediatrics 100:1035–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, E.N. and K.A. Friedman. 2001. “A Current Summary of Breastfeeding Legislation in the U.S.” Schaumburg, IL: La Leche Leaue International. Available on-line: http://www.lalecheleague.orgGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartlett, S., R. Olvera, N. Gill, and M. Laramie. 2002. “WIC Participant and Program Characteristics 2000.” Special Nutrition Programs Report No. WIC-02-PC. Washington, DC: Office of Analysis, Nutrition, and Evaluation, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  4. Beaudry, M., R. Dufour, and S. Marcoux. 1995. “Relation Between Infant Feeding and Infections During the First Six Months of Life.” Journal of Pediatrics 126:191–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bitler, M.P., J.B. Gelbach, and H.W. Hoynes. 2002. “The Impact of Welfare Reform on Living Arrangements.” NBER Working Paper No. W8784. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Chatterji, P., K. Bonuck, S. Dhawan, and N. Deb. 2002. “WIC Participation and the Initiation and Duration of Breastfeeding.” Discussion Paper No. 1246-02. Madison: Institute For Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  7. Council of Economic Advisors. 1997. “Explaining the Decline in Welfare Receipt, 1993–1996.” Washington, DC: Council of Economic Advisors.Google Scholar
  8. —. 1999. “The Effects of Welfare Policy and the Economic Expansion on Welfare Caseloads: An Update.” Washington, DC: Council of Economic Advisors.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, B., J. Ey, C.J. Holberg, A.L. Wright, F.D. Martinez, and L.M. Taussig. 1993. “Exclusive Breast-Feeding for at Least 4 Months Protects Against Otitis Media.” Pediatrics 91:867–72.Google Scholar
  10. Ellwood, D.T. 2000. “The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Social Policy Reforms on Work, Marriage, and Living Arrangements.” National Tax Journal 53:1063–105.Google Scholar
  11. Fein, S.B. and B. Roe. 1998. “The Effect of Work Status on Initiation and Duration of Breast-Feeding.” American Journal of Public Health 88:1042–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grogger, J. Forthcoming. “The Effects of Time Limits, the EITC, and Other Policy Changes on Welfare Use, Work, and Income Among Female-Headed Families.” Review of Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
  13. Grogger, J., S.J. Haider, and J.A. Klerman. 2003. “Why Did the Welfare Caseload Fall During the 1990s? The Importance of Entry.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 93: 288–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grogger, J., L.A. Karoly, and J.A. Klerman. 2002. “Consequences of Welfare Reform: A Research Synthesis.” DRU-2676-DHHS. Prepared by RAND. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  15. Grummer-Strawn, L.M. and R. Li. 2000. “US National Surveillance of Breastfeeding Behavior.” Journal of Human Lactation 16:283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton, G., S. Freedman, L. Gennetian, C. Michalopoulos, J. Walter, D. Adams-Ciardullo, A. Gassman-Pines, S. McGroder, M. Zaslow, J. Brooks, and S. Ahluwalia. 2001. “National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies: How Effective Are Different Welfare-to-Work Approaches? Five-Year Adult and Child Impacts for Eleven Programs.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  17. Hediger, M.L., M.D. Overpeck, R.J. Kuczmarski, and W.J. Ruan. 2001. “Association Between Infant Breastfeeding and Overweight in Young Children.” Journal of the American Medical Association 285(19):2453–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hills-Bonczyk, S.G., M.D. Avery, K. Savik, S. Potter, and L.J. Duckett. 1993. “Women’s Experiences With Combining Breast-Feeding and Employment.” Journal of Nurse Midwifery 38:257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horwood, L.J. and D.M. Fergusson. 1998. “Breastfeeding and Later Cognitive and Academic Outcomes.” Pediatrics 101(1):e9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Labbok, M.H. 2001. “Effects of Breastfeeding on the Mother.” Pediatric Clinics of North America 48:143–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawrence, R.A. 2000. “Breastfeeding: Benefits, Risks, and Alternatives.” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 12:519–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindberg, L.D. 1996a. “Trends in the Relationship Between Breastfeeding and Postpartum Employment in the United States.” Social Biology 43(3–4):191–202.Google Scholar
  23. — 1996b. “Women’s Decisions About Breastfeeding and Maternal Employment.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:239–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Locklin, M.P. and S.J. Naber. 1993. “Does Breastfeeding Empower Women? Insights From a Select Group of Educated, Low-Income, Minority Women.” Birth 20:30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lucas, A., R. Morley, T.J. Cole, G. Lister, and C. Leeson-Payne. 1992. “Breast Milk and Subsequent Intelligence Quotient in Children Born Preterm.” Lancet 339(8787):261–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McTiernan, A. and D.B. Thomas. 1986. “Evidence for a Protective Effect of Lactation on Risk of Breast Cancer in Young Women. Results From a Case-Control Study.” American Journal of Epidemiology 124:353–58.Google Scholar
  27. Meyer, B.D. and D.T. Rosenbaum. 2001. “Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116:1063–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer, B.D. and J.X. Sullivan. 2001. “The Effects of Welfare and Tax Reform: The Material Well-Being of Single Mothers in the 1980s and 1990s.” Working Paper No. W8298. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  29. Moffitt, R.A. 1999. “The Effect of Pre-PRWORA Waivers on AFDC Caseloads and Female Earnings, Income, and Labor Force Behavior.” Pp. 91–118 in Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, edited by S.H. Danziger. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  30. Montgomery, D.L. and P.L. Splett. 1997. “Economic Benefit of Breast-Feeding Infants Enrolled in WIC.” Journal of the American Dietetic Association 97:379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Center for Health Statistics. 2002. National Vital Statistics System: Birth Data [On-line]. Available on-line: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/births.htmGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Neill, J.E. and M.A. Hill. 2001. “Gaining Ground? Measuring the Impact of Welfare Reform on Welfare and Work.” Civic Report 17. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.Google Scholar
  33. Paxson, C. and J. Waldfogel. 2003. “Welfare Reforms, Family Resources, and Child Maltreatment.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22:85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rector, R.E. and S.E. Youssef. 1999. “The Determinants of Welfare Caseload Decline.” Paper CDA99-04. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
  35. Rowe, G. 2000. “State TANF Policies as of July 1999.” Report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  36. Ryan, A.S. 1997. “The Resurgence of Breastfeeding in the United States.” Pediatrics 99(4):e12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. — 2000. “Breastfeeding Trends Through 2000.” Unpublished manuscript. Columbus, OH: Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, A.S., W.F. Pratt, J.L. Wysong, G. Lewandowski, J. McNally, and F.W. Krieger. 1991. “A Comparison of Breast-Feeding Data From the National Surveys of Family Growth and the Ross Laboratories Mothers Surveys.” American Journal of Public Health 81:1049–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schoeni, R.F. and R. Blank. 2000. “What Has Welfare Reform Accomplished? Impacts on Welfare Participation, Employment, Income, Poverty and Family Structure.” Working Paper No. W7627. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  40. State Policy Documentation Project (SPDP). 2000. Data available on-line: http://www.spdp.org. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Center for Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  41. Tuttle, C.R. and K.G. Dewey. 1996. “Potential Cost Savings for Medi-Cal, AFDC, Food Stamps, and WIC Programs Associated With Increasing Breast-Feeding Among Low-Income Hmong Women in California.” Journal of the American Dietetic Association 96:885–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Urban Institute. 2001. Welfare Rules Database [On-line]. Available on-line: http://www.urban.org/Google Scholar
  43. Ziliak, J.P., D.N. Figlio, E.E. Davis, and L.S. Connolly. 2000. “Accounting for the Decline in AFDC Caseloads: Welfare Reform or the Economy?” Journal of Human Resources 35:570–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Haider
    • 1
  • Alison Jacknowitz
    • 2
  • Robert F. Schoeni
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing
  2. 2.RAND Graduate SchoolUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations