Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of economic resources on premarital childbearing and subsequent marriage among young American women

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

This paper extends previous work on premarital childbearing by modeling both the entry rates and the exit rates of unwed motherhood among young American women. In particular, I investigate the impact of economic resources on the likelihood of experiencing a premarital birth and then of subsequent marriage. Using a multiple-destination, multiple-spell hazard regression model and a microsimulation analysis, I analyze the accumulating effects of various economic variables. The results show that the economic resources are indeed important both for premarital childbearing and for subsequent marriage. However, the simulations show that large changes in these economic variables do not necessarily translate into large changes in nonmarital childbearing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aassve, A., S. Burgess, A. Chesher, and C. Propper. 2002. “Transitions From Home to Marriage Among Young Americans.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 17(1):1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, A., P. Morrison, and L. Waite. 1988. “Beyond Stereotypes: Who Becomes a Single Mother?” RAND Report No. R-3489-HHS/NICHD.

  • An, C., R. Haveman, and B. Wolfe. 1993. “Teen Out-of-Wedlock Births and Welfare Receipt: The Role of Childhood Events and Economic Circumstances.” The Review of Economics and Statistics LXXV:195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antel, J.J. 1992. “The Intergenerational Transfers of Welfare Dependency: Some Statistical Evidence.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 74:467–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. 1965. “A Theory of Allocation of Time.” Economic Journal 75:493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. and H.G. Lewis. 1973. “On the Interaction Between Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 81:S143–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brien, M.J. 1997. “Racial Differences in Marriage and the Role of Marriage Markets.” Journal of Human Resources 32:741–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brien, M., L. Lillard, and L. Waite. 1999. “Interrelated Family-Building Behaviors: Cohabitation, Marriage, and Non-marital Conception.” Demography 36:535–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. and H.H. Lu. 2001. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts in the United States.” Population Studies 54(1):29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S.V. and J.J. Heckman. 1999. “The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. W7249, Cambridge, MA.

  • Child Trends. 2002. “Contrary to Popular View, Birth Rates Increased Among Unmarried Women in Their Twenties.” Available on-line: http://www.childtrends.org/TBRate2002.asp (retrieved June 30, 2002).

  • Cole, N. and J. Currie. 1994. “Reported Income in the NLSY: Consistency Checks and Methods of Cleaning the Data.” National Bureau of Economic Research Technical Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.

  • Cooksey, E. 1990. “Factors in the Resolution of Adolescent Premarital Pregnancies.” Demography 27:207–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.J. and S.D. Hoffman. 1990. “Welfare Benefits, Economic Opportunities and the Incidence of Out-of-Wedlock Births Among Black Teenage Girls.” Demography 27:519–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermisch, J. 1989. “Purchased Child Care, Optimal Family Size and Mother’s Employment: Theory and Econometric Analysis.” Journal of Population Economics 2:79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F. and C. Goldscheider. 1999. “The Changing Transition to Adulthood: Leaving and Returning Home.” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S.L., D.E. Myers, and A.L. Ginsburg. 1987. “The Role of Responsibility and Knowledge in Reducing Teenage Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:241–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R. and B. Wolfe. 1994. Succeeding Generations: On the Effects of Investments in Children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J. and B. Singer. 1984. “A Method for Minimising the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data.” Econometrica 52:271–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S. and E. Foster. 2000. “AFDC Benefits and Nonmarital Births to Young Women.” Journal of Human Resources 35:376–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korenman, S., J.E. Miller, and J.E. Sjaastad. 1995. “Long-Term Poverty and Child Developments in the United States: Results From the NLSY.” Children and Youth Services Review 17: 127–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, T. 1990. The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D.T., D.K. McLaughlin, G. Kephart, and D.J. Landry. 1992. “Race and the Retreat From Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?” American Sociological Review 57: 781–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D.T., D.K. McLaughlin, and D. Ribar. 1997. “Welfare and the Rise in Female-Headed Families.” American Journal of Sociology 103:112–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S. and R. Plotnick. 1995. “Adolescent Premarital Childbearing: Do Economic Incentives Matter?” Journal of Labour Economics 13:177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.D. 1993. “Marriage and Cohabitation Following Premarital Conception.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 55:839–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.D. and N.S. Landale. 1996. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Role of Cohabitation in Premarital Childbearing.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.D. and P.J. Smock. 1995. “Why Marry? Race and the Transition to Marriage Among Cohabitors.” Demography 32:509–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. and G. Sandefur. 1995. Growing up With a Single Parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. 1974. Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R.A. 1992. “The Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review.” Journal of Economic Literature 30:1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. “Welfare Effects on Female Headship With Area Effects.” Journal of Human Resources 29:621–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. 2000. “Welfare Benefits and Female Headship in U.S. Time Series.” American Economic Reviews 90:373–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R., D. Ribar, and M. Wilhelm. 1998. “The Decline of Welfare Benefits in the U.S.: The Role of Wage Inequality.” Journal of Public Economics 68:421–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z. and S. Preston. 1993. “Changes in American Marriage, 1972-1987.” American Sociological Review 58:482–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raley, R.K. 2001. “Increasing Fertility in Cohabiting Unions: Evidence for the Second Demographic Transition in the United States.” Demography 38:59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, M.S. 1999. “Entry or Exit? A Transition-Probability Approach to Explaining the High Prevalence of Single-Motherhood Among Black Women.” Demography 36:369–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roempke Graefe, D. and D.T. Lichter. 1999. “Life Course Transitions of American Children: Parental Cohabitation, Marriage, and Single Motherhood.” Demography 36:205–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. 1999. “Welfare, Marital Prospects, and Nonmarital Childbearing.” Journal of Political Economy 107:S3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.R. and K.I. Wolpin. 1993. “Parental and Public Transfers to Young Women and Their Children.” American Economic Review 84:1195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, W. 1992. “Unobserved Variables and Marital Status: The Schooling Connection.” Journal of Population Economics 5:217–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S.J. 1996. “Mate Availability and the Transition to Unwed Motherhood: A Paradox of Population Structure.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:265–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch, D.M., L. Lillard, and C.W.A. Panis. 2002. “Nonmarital Chilbearing: Influences of Education, Marriage, and Fertility.” Demography 39:311–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, G. 2000. “Duration Models: Specification, Identification, and Multiple Durations.” Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. V, edited by J.J. Heckman and E. Leamer. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R.J. 1999. “A Theory of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing.” Journal of Political Economy 107:S33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, B., K. Wilson, and R. Haveman. 2001. “The Role of Economic Incentives in Teenage Nonmarital Childbearing Choices.” Journal of Public Economics 81:473–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L.L. and B.C. Martinson. 1993. “Family Structure and the Risk of Premarital Birth.” American Sociological Review 58:210–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L.L. and B. Wolfe. 2002. Out of Wedlock: Causes and Consequences of Nonmarital Fertility. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K. and D. Kandel. 1987. “Drug Use and Other Determinants of Premarital Pregnancy and Its Outcome: A Dynamic Analysis of Competing Life Events.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:257–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.J. and P.B. Levine. 1999. “An Empirical Analysis of the Welfare Magnet Debate Using the NLSY.” Journal of Population Economics 12:391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to Simon Burgess, Andrew Chesher, John Ermish, Carol Propper, and David Winter for very useful discussions and comments on this work. Also thanks to Francesco Billari, Janet Currie, Montezuma Dumangane, Kees Jan van Garderen, Jan Hoem, Jen Ireland, Hans-Peter Kohler, Tony Lancaster, and Paris Nearchou, who provided useful comments. I am also grateful to Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research for providing support during the revision of this paper. Above all, I am indebted to the three anonymous referees whose comments improved this paper immensely. Any remaining error lies with the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aassve, A. The impact of economic resources on premarital childbearing and subsequent marriage among young American women. Demography 40, 105–126 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0001

Keywords

Navigation