, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 435–453 | Cite as

An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples

  • Lisa K. Jepsen
  • Christopher A. Jepsen


We used 1990 Census data to compare the matching behaviors of four types of cohabiting couples: same-sex male couples, same-sex female couples, opposite-sex unmarried couples, and married couples. In general, we found evidence of positive assortative mating for all traits and across all types of couples. The positive assortative mating, however, is stronger for non-labor-market traits (e.g., age, education) than for labor-market traits (e.g., hourly earnings). Further, members of married couples are more alike with respect to most characteristics than are members of opposite-sex cohabiting couples, and members of opposite-sex cohabiting couples are more alike than are members of same-sex couples.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allegretto, S.A. and M.M. Arthur. 2001. “An Empirical Analysis of Homosexual/Heterosexual Male Earnings Differentials:Unmarried and Unequal?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54:631–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badgett, M.V.L. 1995. “The Wage Effects of Sexual Orientation Discrimination.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48:726–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badgett, M.V.L. and R.M. Williams. 1992. “The Economics of Sexual Orientation: Establishing a Research Agenda.” Feminist Studies 18:649–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, J.M., P.Y. Kim, A. Hills, and J.A.W. Linsenmeier. 1997. “Butch, Femme, or Straight Acting? Partner Preferences of Gay Men and Lesbians.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73:960–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G.S. 1974. “A Theory of Marriage.” Pp. 299–344 in Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital, edited by T.W. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bergstrom, T.C. and M. Bagnoli. 1993. “Courtship as a Waiting Game.” Journal of Political Economy 101:185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, D.A., G. Gates, S.G. Sanders, and L. Taylor. 2000. “Demographics of the Gay and Lesbian Population in the United States:Evidence From Available Systematic Data Sources.” Demography 37:139–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —. 2002. “Why Do Gays Live in San Francisco?” Journal of Urban Economics 51:54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black, D.A., H.R. Makar, S.G. Sanders, and L. Taylor. Forthcoming. “The Effects of Sexual Orientation on Earnings.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review.Google Scholar
  11. Blackwell, D.L. and D.T. Lichter. 2000. “Mate Selection Among Married and Cohabiting Couples.” Journal of Family Issues 21:275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blumstein, P. and P. Schwartz. 1983. American Couples. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Boyden, T., J.S. Carroll, and R.A. Maier. 1984. “Similarity and Attraction in Homosexual Males: The Effects of Age and Masculinity/Femininity.” Sex Roles 10:939–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bumpass, L.L. and J.A. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 26:615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bumpass, L.L., J.A. Sweet, and A. Cherlin. 1991. “The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:913–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fu, V.K. 2001. “Racial Intermarriage Pairings.” Demography 38:147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harry, J. 1982. “Decision Making and Age Difference Among Gay Male Couples.” Journal of Homosexuality 8:9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes, A.F. 1995. “Age Preferences for Same- and Opposite-Sex Partners.” Journal of Social Psychology 135:125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaffe, K. and G. Chacon-Puignau. 1995. “Assortative Mating:Sex Differences in Mate Selection for Married and Unmarried Couples.” Human Biology 67:111–20.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, M.S. 1974. “Role Differentiation in Female Homosexual Quasi-Marital Unions.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 36:360–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klawitter, M.M. 1995. “Did They Find Each Other or Create Each Other? Labor Market Linkages Between Partners in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, April 6–8.Google Scholar
  22. Klawitter, M.M. 1998. “The Determinants of Earnings for Women in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Allied Social Science Association, Chicago, January 3–5.Google Scholar
  23. Kurdek, L.A. 1992. “Relationship Stability and Relationship Satisfaction in Cohabiting Gay and Lesbian Couples: A Prospective Longitudinal Test of the Contextual and Interdependence Models.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 9:125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lam, D. 1988. “Marriage Markets and Assortative Mating With Household Public Goods: Theoretical Results and Empirical Implications.” Journal of Human Resources 23:462–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laner, M.R. 1977. “Permanent Partner Priorities:Gay and Straight.” Journal of Homosexuality 3:21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mare, R.D. 1991. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review 56:15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McFadden, D. 1973. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” Pp. 105–42 in Frontiers in Economics, edited by P. Zaremka. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Model, S. and F. Fisher. 2001. “Black-White Unions:West Indians and African Americans.” Demography 38:177–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakosteen, R.A. and M. Zimmer. 2001. “Spousal Selection and Earnings:Evidence of Marital Sorting.” Economic Inquiry 39:201–13.Google Scholar
  30. 1990 Census of Population and Housing, Public Use Microdata Sample, Technical Documentation. 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. Over, R. and G. Phillips. 1997. “Differences Between Men and Women in Age Preferences for a Same-Sex Partner.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20:138–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qian, Z. and D.T. Lichter. 2001. “Measuring Marital Assimilation:Intermarriage Among Natives and Immigrants.” Social Science Research 30:289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenfeld, M.J. 2001. “The Salience of Pan-National Hispanic and Asian Identities in U.S. Marriage Markets.” Demography 38:161–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schafer, R.B. and P.M. Keith. 1990. “Matching by Weight in Married Couples:A Life Cycle Perspective.” The Journal of Social Psychology 130:657–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sergios, P.A. and J. Cody. 1986. “Importance of Physical Attractiveness and Social Assertiveness Skills in Male Homosexual Dating Behavior and Partner Selection.” Journal of Homosexuality 12:71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. South, S.J. 1991. “Sociodemographic Differentials in Mate Selection Preferences.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:928–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. — 1993. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Desire to Marry.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 55:357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stevens, G., D. Owens, and E.C. Schaefer. 1990. “Education and Attractiveness in Marriage Choices.” Social Psychology Quarterly 53:62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stuart, A. and J.K. Ord. 1991. Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics: Volume 2. Classical Inference and Relationship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Suen, W. and H.K. Lui. 1999. “A Direct Test of the Efficient Marriage Market Hypothesis.” Economic Inquiry 37:29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa K. Jepsen
    • 1
  • Christopher A. Jepsen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThe University of Northern IowaCedar Falls
  2. 2.Public Policy Institute of CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations