, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 369–392 | Cite as

Intergenerational mobility in the post-1965 immigration era: Estimates by an immigrant generation cohort method

  • Julie ParkEmail author
  • Dowell Myers


The new second generation of the post-1965 immigration era is observed as children with their parents in 1980 and again as adults 25 years later. Intergenerational mobility is assessed for both men and women in four major racial/ethnic groups, both in regard to children’s status attainment relative to parents and with regard to the rising societal standards proxied by native-born non-Hispanic whites. A profile of intergenerational mobility is prepared using multiple indicators of status attainment: high school and college completion, upper white-collar occupation, poverty, and homeowner ship. The immigrant generation cohort method we introduce accounts for four distinct temporal dimensions of immigrant progress, clarifying inconsistencies in the literature and highlighting differences in mobility between racial/ethnic groups and with respect to different outcome measures. The immigrant generation cohort method consistently finds greater intergenerational mobility than suggested by alternative approaches. Our analysis also shows that the intergenerational progress of women is greater than that of men and provides a more complete record of immigrant mobility overall. Findings for individual racial/ethnic groups accord with some expectations in the literature and contradict others.


Immigrant Parent Immigrant Generation Russell Sage Foundation Intergenerational Mobility Status Attainment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alba, R. 1985 Italian-Americans: Into the Twilight of Ethnicity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Alba, R.D. and V. Nee. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and the New Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, F.D., J. Chapa, R.R. Berg, and K.A. Sowards. 1994. “Educational and Sociodemographic Incorporation Among Hispanic Immigrants to the United States.” Pp. 73–99 in Immigration and Ethnicity: The Integration of America’s Newest Arrivals, edited by B. Edmonston and J.S. Passel. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bean, F.D. and G. Stevens. 2003. America’s Newcomers and the Dynamics of Diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Bean, F.D. and M. Tienda. 1987. The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, P.M. and O.D. Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley Press.Google Scholar
  7. Borjas, G. 1985. “Assimilation, Changes in Cohort Quality, and the Earnings of Immigrants.” Journal of Labor Economics 3: 463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —. 1995. “Assimilation and Changes in Cohort Quality Revisited: What Happened to Immigrant Earnings in the 1980s?” Journal of Labor Economics 13: 201–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Card, D. 2005. “Is the New Immigration Really So Bad?” The Economic Journal 115: 300–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapa, J. 1990. “The Myth of Hispanic Progress: Trends in the Educational and Economic Attainment of Mexican Americans.” Journal of Hispanic Policy 4: 3–18.Google Scholar
  11. Duleep, H. and M.C. Regets. 1997. “The Decline in Immigrant Entry Earnings: Less Transferable Skills or Lower Ability?” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 37: 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan, O.D., D.L. Featherman, and B. Duncan. 1972. Socioeconomic Background and Achievement. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  13. Farley, R. and R. Alba. 2002. “The New Second Generation in the United States.” International Migration Review 36: 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feliciano, C. 2005. Unequal Origins: Immigrant Selection and the Education of the Second Generation. El Paso: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
  15. Feliciano, C. and R. Rumbaut. 2005. “Gendered Paths: Educational and Occupational Expectations and Outcomes Among Adult Children of Immigrants.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28: 1087–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foner, N. 2000. From Ellis Island to JFK: New York’s Two Great Waves of Immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Fronczek, P. and P. Johnson. 2003. “Occupations: 2000.” Census 2000 Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  18. Gans, H. 1992. “Second-Generation Decline: Scenarios for the Economic and Ethnic Futures of the Post-1965 American Immigrants.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 15: 173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —. 2007. “Acculturation, Assimilation, and Mobility.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30: 152–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibson, C. and K. Jung. 2006. “Historical Census Statistics on the Foreign-Born Population of the United States: 1850 to 2000.” Working Paper No. 81. Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Glazer, N. and D.P. Moynihan. 1963. Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Grogger, J. and S. Trejo. 2002. “Falling Behind or Moving Up? The Intergenerational Progress of Mexican Americans.” San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
  24. Jasso, G. and M.R. Rosenzweig. 1990. The New Chosen People: Immigrants in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Jensen, L. and Y. Chitose. 1994. “Today’s Second Generation: Evidence From the 1990 U.S. Census.” International Migration Review 28: 714–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kao, G. and M. Tienda. 1995. “Optimism and Achievement: The Educational Performance of Immigrant Youth.” Social Science Quarterly 76: 1–19.Google Scholar
  27. Kasinitz, P., J. Mollenkopf, and M.C. Waters. 2004. Becoming New Yorkers: Ethnographies of the New Second Generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Lieberson, S. and M.C. Waters. 1988. From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Lopez, N. 2003. Hopeful Girls, Troubled Boys: Race and Gender Disparity in Urban Education. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Massey, D.S. 1995. “The New Immigration and Ethnicity in the United States.” Population and Development Review 21: 631–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Model, S. 1988. “Italian and Jewish Intergenerational Mobility in 1910 and in New York.” Social Science History 12: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Myers, D. and C. Cranford. 1998. “Temporal Differentiation in the Occupational Mobility of Immigrant and Native-Born Latina Workers.” American Sociological Review 63: 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Myers, D. and S.W. Lee. 1996. “Immigration Cohorts and Residential Overcrowding in Southern California.” Demography 33: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oropesa, R.S. and N. Landale. 1997. “In Search of the New Second Generation: Alternative Strategies for Identifying Second Generation Children and Understanding Their Acquisition of English.” Sociological Perspectives 40: 429–55.Google Scholar
  35. Perlmann, J. 2006. Italians Then, Mexicans Now: Immigrant Origins and Second-Generation Progress, 1980 to 2000. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.Google Scholar
  36. Perlmann, J. and R. Waldinger. 1997. “Second Generation Decline? Children of Immigrants, Past and Present—A Reconsideration.” International Migration Review 31: 893–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Portes, A. 1987. “The Social Origins of the Cuban Enclave Economy of Miami.” Sociological Perspectives. 30: 340–72.Google Scholar
  38. Portes, A. and R.G. Rumbaut. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California and Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. —. 2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Portes, A. and R. Schauffler. 1994. “Language and the Second Generation: Bilingualism Yesterday and Today.” International Migration Review 28: 640–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Portes, A. and M. Zhou. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants Among Post-1965 Immigrant Youth.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530: 74–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramakrishnan, S.K. 2004. “Second Generation Immigrants? The ‘2.5’ Generation in the United States.” Social Science Quarterly 85: 380–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reed, D., L.E. Hill, C. Jensen, and H.P. Johnson. 2005. Educational Progress Across Immigrant Generations in California. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
  44. Rumbaut, R. 1994. “The Crucible Within: Ethnic Identity, Self-esteem, and Segmented Assimilation Among Children of Immigrants.” International Migration Review 28: 748–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. —. 1997. “Ties that Bind: Immigration and Immigrant Families in the United States.” Pp. 3–46 in International Migration and Family Change, edited by A. Booth, A.C. Crouter, and N.S. Landale. New York: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. —. 2005. “Turning Points in the Transition to Adulthood: Determinants of Educational Attainment, Incarceration, and Early Childbearing Among Children of Immigrants.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28: 1041–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, J. 2003. “Assimilation Across the Latino Generations.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 93: 315–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoops, N.S. 2006. “A Half-Century of Learning: Historical Census Statistics on Educational Attainment in the United States, 1940 to 2000.” Population Division of the U.S. Census Bureau. Available online at Scholar
  49. Thernstrom, S. 1964. Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. U.S. Census Bureau. 2006. “Design and Methodology.” Current Population Survey Technical Paper 66. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  51. Waldinger, R. and C. Der-Martirosian. 2001. “The Immigrant Niche: Pervasive, Persistent, Diverse.” Pp. 228–71 in Strangers at the Gates: New Immigrants in Urban America, edited by R. Waldinger. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Waldinger, R. and C. Feliciano. 2004. “Will the New Second Generation Experience ‘Downward Assimilation’? Segmented Assimilation Re-Assessed.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 27: 376–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warner, W.L. and L. Srole. 1945. The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Waters, M.C. 1999. Black Identities: West Indian Immigrant Dreams and American Realities. New York, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press & Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  55. Watkins, S.C., ed. 1994. After Ellis Island: Newcomers and Natives in the 1910 Census. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. Zangwill, I. 1908. The Melting Pot. New York: The Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
  57. Zeng, Z. and Y. Xie. 2004. “Asian-Americans’ Earnings Disadvantage Reexamined: The Role of Place of Education.” American Journal of Sociology 109: 1075–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou, M. and C.L. Bankston. 2001. “Family Pressure and the Educational Experience of the Daughters of Vietnamese Refugees.” International Migration Review 39: 133–51.Google Scholar
  59. Zsembik, B. and D. Llanes. 1996. “Generational Differences in Educational Attainment Among Mexican Americans.” Social Science Quarterly 77: 363–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Asian American Studies ProgramUniversity of MarylandCollege Park
  2. 2.School of Policy, Planning, and DevelopmentUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations