Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 503–519 | Cite as

The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in western Europe

  • Adriaan KalwijEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article analyzes the impact on fertility of changes in national expenditure for family allowances, maternity- and parental-leave benefits, and childcare subsidies. To do so, I estimate a model for the timing of births using individual-level data from 16 western European countries, supplemented with data on national social expenditure for different family policy programs. The latter allow approximation of the subsidies that households with children receive from such programs. The results show that increased expenditure on family policy programs that help women to combine family and employment-and thus reduce the opportunity cost of children—generates positive fertility responses.

Keywords

Total Fertility Rate Parental Leave Family Policy European Social Survey Crude Birth Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adserà, A. 2004. “Changing Fertility Rates in Developed Countries: The Impact of Labour Market Institutions.” Journal of Population Economics 17: 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. —. 2005. “Vanishing Children: From High Unemployment to Low Fertility in Developed Countries.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 95: 189–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. 2006. “An Economic Analysis of the Gap Between Desired and Actual Fertility: The Case of Spain.” Review of Economics of the Household 4: 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahn, N. and P. Mira. 2002. “A Note on the Changing Relationship Between Fertility and Female Employment Rates in Developed Countries.” Journal of Population Economics 15: 667–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angeles, G., D.K. Guilkey, and T.A. Mroz. 2005. “The Determinants of Fertility in Rural Peru: Program Effects in the Early Years of the National Family Planning Program.” Journal of Population Economics 18: 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Averett, S.L. and L.A. Whittington. 2001. “Does Maternity Leave Induce Births?” Southern Economic Journal 68: 403–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, G.S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. 1993. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Björklund, A. 2006. “Does Family Policy Affect Fertility?” Journal of Population Economics 19: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, D.M. and P.K. Robins. 1989. “Fertility, Employment, and Child-Care Costs.” Demography 26: 287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boldrin, M., M. De Nardi, and L.E. Jones. 2005. “Fertility and Social Security.” NBER Working Paper 11146. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Bongaarts, J. 1999. “Fertility Decline in the Developed World: Where Will It End?” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 89: 256–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —. 2002. “The End of the Fertility Transition in the Developed World.” Population and Development Review 28: 419–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brackett, J., R.T. Ravenholt, and J.C. Chao. 1978. “The Role of Family Planning in Recent Rapid Fertility Declines in Developing Countries.” Studies in Family Planning 9: 314–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butz, W.P. and M.P. Ward. 1979 “The Emergency of Countercyclical U.S. Fertility.” American Economic Review 69: 318–28.Google Scholar
  15. Cameron, S.V. and J.J. Heckman. 1998. “Life Cycle Schooling and Dynamic Selection Bias: Models and Evidence for Five Cohorts of American Males.” Journal of Political Economy 106: 262–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cameron, A.C. and P.K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics, Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Castles, F.G. 2003. “The World Turned Upside Down: Below Replacement Fertility, Changing Preferences and Family-Friendly Public Policy in 21 OECD Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 13: 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chesnais, J.-C. 1996. “Fertility, Family, and Social Policy in Contemporary Western Europe.” Population and Development Review 22: 729–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —. 1998. “Below-Replacement Fertility in the European Union (EU-15): Facts and Policies, 1960–1997.” Review of Population and Social Policy 7: 83–101.Google Scholar
  20. d’Addio, A.C. and M.M. d’Ercole. 2005. Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates in OECD Countries: The Role of Policies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
  21. Ermisch, J. 1988. “Econometric Analysis of Birth Rate Dynamics in Britain.” Journal of Human Resources 23: 563–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. European Social Survey (ESS) Round 2. 2004. Data file edition 3.1. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway [data archive and distributor of ESS data]. Available online at www.europeansocialsurvey.org.Google Scholar
  23. Folbre, N. 1994. “Children as Public Goods.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 84(2): 86–90.Google Scholar
  24. Galor, O. and D.N. Weil. 1996. “The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth.” American Economic Review 86: 374–87.Google Scholar
  25. Gauthier, A.H. 2002. “Family Policy in Industrialized Countries: Is There Convergence?” Population 57: 447–74.Google Scholar
  26. Gauthier, A.H. and J. Hatzius. 1997. “Family Policy and Fertility: An Econometric Analysis.” Population Studies 51: 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldstein, J., W. Lutz, and M. Rita. 2003. “The Emergence of Sub-Replacement Family Size Ideals in Europe.” Population Research and Policy Review 22: 479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gustafsson, S. 2001. “Optimal Age at Motherhood. Theoretical and Empirical Considerations on Postponement of Maternity in Europe.” Journal of Population Economics 14: 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gustafsson, S. and A. Kalwij. 2006. Education and Postponement of Maternity: Economic Analyses for Industrialized Countries. European Studies of Population, Vol. 15. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Hantrais, L. 1997. “Exploring Relationships Between Social Policy and Changing Family Forms Within the European Union.” European Journal of Population 13: 339–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalwij, A.S. 2000. “The Effects of Female Employment Status on the Presence and Number of Children.” Journal of Population Economics 13: 221–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kravdal, ø. 2002. “The Impact of Individual and Aggregate Unemployment on Fertility in Norway.” Demographic Research 6: 263–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lalive, R. and J. Zweimuller. 2009. “How Does Parental Leave Affect Fertility and Return-to-Work? Evidence From Two Natural Experiments.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124: 1363–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Law, A.M. and W.D. Kelton. 1982. Simulation Modelling and Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, R. 2003. “The Demographic Transition: Three Centuries of Fundamental Change.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDonald, P. 2006. “Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy.” Population and Development Review 32: 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Milligan, K. 2005. “Subsidizing the Stork: New Evidence on Tax Incentives and Fertility.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87: 539–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moulton, B.R. 1990. “An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Units.” Review of Economics and Statistics 72: 334–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neyer, G. 2006. “Family Policies and Low Fertility in Western Europe.” Journal of Population and Social Security (Population) 1(Suppl.): 46–93.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. 2007a. Factbook 2007: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. —. 2007b. The Social Expenditure Database: An Interpretative Guide, SOCX 1980–2003. Paris: OECD. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/els/social/expenditure.Google Scholar
  42. Tsui, A.O. 2001. “Population Policies, Family Planning Programs, and Fertility: The Record.” Population and Development Review 27(Suppl.): 184–204.Google Scholar
  43. Van de Kaa, D.J. 2006. “Temporarily New: On Low Fertility and the Prospects of Pro-natal Policies.” Pp. 193–211 in Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography.Google Scholar
  44. Van Noord-Zaadstra, B.M., C.W.N. Looman, H. Alsbach, J.D.F. Habbema, E.R. te Velde, and J. Karbaat. 1991. “Delaying Childbearing: Effect of Age on Fecundity and Outcome of Pregnancy.” British Medical Journal 302: 1361–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whittington, L.A. 1992. “Taxes and the Family: The Impact of the Tax Exemption for Dependents on Marital Fertility.” Demography 29: 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whittington, L.A., J. Alm, and H.E. Peters. 1990. “The Personal Exemption and Fertility in the United States.” American Economic Review 80: 545–56.Google Scholar
  47. Willis, R.J. 1973. “A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 81(2, pt. 2): S14-S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yule, G.U. 1906. “On the Changes in the Marriage- and Birth-Rates in England and Wales During the Past Half Century; With an Inquiry as to Their Probable Causes.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 69(1): 88–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang, J., J. Quan, and P. van Meerbergen. 1994. “The Effect of Tax-Transfer Policies on Fertility in Canada.” Journal of Human Resources 29: 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utrecht School of EconomicsUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and RetirementThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations