, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 459–479 | Cite as

A comparative perspective on intermarriage: Explaining differences among national-origin groups in the United States

  • Matthijs KalmijnEmail author
  • Frank Van Tubergen


Little is known about the validity of group-level theories of ethnic intermarriage despite the fact that such theories are often invoked in explaining why certain ethnic groups are “closed,” whereas others are relatively “open.” We develop a comparative perspective by analyzing the marriage choices of 94 national-origin groups in the United States, using pooled data from the Current Population Surveys, 1994–2006, and multilevel models in which individual and contextual determinants of intermarriage are included simultaneously. Our analyses show large differences in endogamy across groups. After taking compositional effects into account, we find that both structural and cultural group-level factors have significant effects on endogamy. Cultural explanations (which focus on the role of norms and preferences) play a more important role than structural explanations (which focus on meeting and mating opportunities). Our results reinforce the common but untested interpretation of endogamy in terms of group boundaries.


Ethnic Identity Current Population Survey Origin Group National Origin Interracial Marriage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alba, R. 1990. Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alba, R.D. and R.M. Golden. 1986. “Patterns of Ethnic Marriage in the United States.” Social Forces 65: 202–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alba, R. and V. Nee. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alesina, A., A. Devleeschauwer, W. Easterly, S. Kurlat, and R. Wacziarg. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8: 155–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, R.N. and R. Saenz. 1994. “Structural Determinants of Mexican American Intermarriage, 1975–1980.” Social Science Quarterly 75: 414–30.Google Scholar
  6. Angrist, J. 2002. “How Do Sex Ratios Affect Marriage and Labor Markets? Evidence From America’s Second Generation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 997–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batson, C.D., Z. Qian, and D.T. Lichter. 2006. “Interracial and Intraracial Patterns of Mate Selection Among America’s Diverse Black Populations.” Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 658–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackwell, D.L. and D.T. Lichter. 2004. “Homogamy Among Dating, Cohabiting, and Married Couples.” Sociological Quarterly 45: 719–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, P.M. and J.E. Schwartz. 1984. Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Borjas, G.J. 1992. “Ethnic Capital and Intergenerational Mobility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 123–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brierley, P. 1997. World Churches Handbook. Exeter: BPC Wheaton Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, F.J. 1991. Who Is Black? One Nation’s Definition. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dreher, A. 2006. “Does Globalization Affect Growth? Empirical Evidence From a New Index.” Applied Economics 38: 1091–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esveldt, I. and J.J. Schoorl. 1998. “Veranderingen in de huwelijkssluiting van Turken en Marokkanen in Nederland” [Changes in marriage formation of Turks and Morrrocans in the Netherlands]. Bevolking en Gezin 27: 53–86.Google Scholar
  15. Feliciano, C. 2001. “Assimilation or Enduring Racial Boundaries? Generational Differences in Intermarriage Among Asians and Latinos in the United States.” Race & Society 4: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilbertson, G.A., J.P. Fitzpatrick, and Y. Lijun. 1996. “Hispanic Intermarriage in New York City: New Evidence From 1991.” International Migration Review 30: 445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goode, W.J. 1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Grimes, B.F. 2000. “Ethnologue: Languages of the World.” 14th ed. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
  19. Gshur, B. and B.S. Okun. 2003. “Generational Effects on Marriage Patterns: Four Decades of Jewish Immigrants and Their Descendents in Israel.” Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, D.R. and H. Ono. 2005. “How Many Interracial Marriages Would There Be if All Groups Were of Equal Size in All Places? A New Look at National Estimates of Interracial Marriage.” Social Science Research 34: 236–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hout, M. and J.R. Goldstein. 1994. “How 4.5 Million Irish Immigrants Became 40 Million Irish Americans: Demographic and Subjective Aspects of the Ethnic Composition of White Americans.” American Sociological Review 59: 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang, S.-S. and R. Saenz. 1990. “The Problem Posed by Immigrants Married Abroad on Intermarriage Research: The Case of Asian Americans.” International Migration Review 24: 563–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hwang, S.-S., R. Saenz, and B.E. Aguirre. 1995. “The SES Selectivity of Interracially Married Asians.” International Migration Review 29: 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. —. 1997. “Structural and Assimilationist Explanations of Asian American Intermarriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 59: 758–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs, J.A. and T.G. Labov. 2002. “Gender Differentials in Intermarriage Among Sixteen Race and Ethnic Groups.” Sociological Forum 17: 621–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jasso, G., D.S. Massey, M.R. Rosenzweig, and J.P. Smith. 2003. “Exploring the Religious Preference of Recent Immigrants to the United States: Evidence From the New Immigrant Pilot Survey.” Pp. 217–53 in Religion and immigration, edited by Y.Y. Haddad and J.L. Esposito. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kalmijn, M. 1993. “Spouse Selection Among the Children of European Immigrants: A Comparison of Marriage Cohorts in the 1960 Census.” International Migration Review 27: 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. —. 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King, M., S. Ruggles, T. Alexander, D. Leicach, and M. Sobek. 2004. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 2.0. [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor].Google Scholar
  30. Landale, N.S. and S.E. Tolnay. 1993. “Generation, Ethnicity, and Marriage: Historical Patterns in the Northern United States.” Demography 30: 103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, S.M. and M. Fernandez. 1998. “Trends in Asian American Racial/Ethnic Intermarriage: A Comparison of 1980 and 1990 Census Data.” Sociological Perspectives 41: 323–42.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, S.M. and K. Yamanaka. 1990. “Patterns of Asian American Intermarriage and Marital Assimilation.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 21: 287–305.Google Scholar
  33. Lehrer, E. 1998. “Religious Intermarriage in the United States: Determinants and Trends.” Social Science Research 27: 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lichter, D.T., J.B. Brown, Z. Qian, and J.H. Carmalt. 2007. “Marital Assimilation Among Hispanics: Evidence of Declining Cultural and Economic Incorporation?” Social Science Quarterly 88: 745–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lieberson, S. 1963. Ethnic Patterns in American Cities. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lieberson, S. and M. Waters. 1988. From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. Monden, C.W.S. and J. Smits. 2005. “Ethnic Intermarriage in Times of Social Change: The Case of Latvia.” Demography 42: 323–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Okamoto, D.G. 2007. “Marrying Out: A Boundary Approach to Understanding the Marital Integration of Asian Americans.” Social Science Research 36: 1391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pagnini, D.L. and S.P. Morgan. 1990. “Intermarriage and Social Distance Among U.S. Immigrants at the Turn of the Century.” American Journal of Sociology 96: 405–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Portes, A. and R.G. Rumbaut. 1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Qian, Z., S.L. Blair, and S.D. Ruf. 2001. “Asian American Interracial and Interethnic Marriages: Differences by Education and Nativity.” International Migration Review 35: 557–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qian, Z. and J.A. Cobas. 2004. “Latino’s Mate Selection: National Origin, Racial, and Nativity Differences.” Social Science Research 33: 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qian, Z. and D.T. Lichter. 2007. “Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage.” American Sociological Review 72: 68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rumbaut, R.G. 1994. “The Crucible Within: Ethnic Identity, Self-esteem, and Segmented Assimilation Among Children of Immigrants.” International Migration Review 28: 748–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sassler, S.L. 1997. “Women’s Marital Timing at the Turn of the Century: Generational and Ethnic Differences.” Sociological Quarterly 38: 567–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sherkat, D.E. 2004. “Religious Intermarriage in the United States: Trends, Patterns, and Predictors.” Social Science Research 33: 606–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Snijders, T. and R. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Stevens, G. 1999. “Age at Immigration and Second Language Proficiency Among Foreign-born Adults.” Language in Society 28: 555–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stevens, G. and G. Swicegood. 1987. “The Linguistic Context of Ethnic Endogamy.” American Sociological Review 52: 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sung, B.L. 1990. “Chinese American Intermarriage.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 21: 337–52.Google Scholar
  51. van Tubergen, F. and I. Maas. 2007. “Ethnic Intermarriage Among Immigrants in the Netherlands: An Analysis of Population Data.” Social Science Research 36: 1065–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waters, M. 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Xie, Y. and K. Goyette. 1997. “The Racial Identification of Biracial Children With One Asian Parent: Evidence From the 1990 Census.” Social Forces 76: 547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyTilburg UniversityLE TilburgNetherlands
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUtrecht UniversityNetherlands

Personalised recommendations