Skip to main content

The increasing risk of poverty across the American life course

Demography volume 46, pages 717–737 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

This article extends the emerging body of life course research on poverty by empirically identifying the incidence, chronicity, and age pattern of American poverty and how these dimensions have changed during the period 1968-2000. Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we construct a series of life tables that estimate the risk of poverty for adults during their 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s, and compare these estimates for Americans in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Our empirical results suggest that the risk of acute poverty increased substantially, particularly in the 1990s. This observed increase was especially pronounced for individuals in their 20s, 30s, and 40s; for all age groups with respect to extreme poverty; and for white males. On the other hand, the risk of chronic poverty declined during the 1990s (as measured by the percentage of the poor who experienced five or more years of poverty within a 10-year interval). The results in this article tell a very different story than the Census Bureau's yearly cross-sectional rates, which have shown little overall change in the U.S. poverty rate during this 30-year period. In contrast, a life course approach reveals a rising economic risk of acute poverty for individuals, one that is consistent with recent observations and research suggesting that a growing number of Americans will eventually find themselves in an economically precarious position.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Allison, P.D. 1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreski, P., F. Stafford, and W.J. Yeung. 2008. “Assessing the PSID t-2 Income Data.” Panel Study of Income Dynamics Technical Paper Series, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bane, M.J. and D.T. Ellwood. 1986. “Slipping Into and Out of Poverty: The Dynamics of Spells.” Journal of Human Resources 21:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bania, N. and L. Leete. 2007. “Income Volatility and Food Insufficiency in U.S. Low-Income Households, 1992–2003.” IRP Discussion Paper No. 1325–07. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Blank, R.M. 1997. It Takes a Nation: A New Agenda for Fighting Poverty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2008. “Presidential Address: How to Improve Poverty Measurement in the United States.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27:233–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.M., S.H. Danziger, and R.F. Schoeni. 2006. Working and Poor: How Economic and Policy Changes Are Affecting Low-Wage Workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D. 2003. “Rethinking the Sociological Measurement of Poverty.” Social Forces 81:715–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhauser, R.V., R.R. Weathers II, and M. Schroeder. 2006. Panel Study of Income Dynamics Technical Paper Series: A Guide to Disability Statistics From the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Employment and Disability Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellini, S.R., S.M. McKernan, and C. Ratcliffe. 2008. “The Dynamics of Poverty in the United States: A Review of Data, Methods, and Findings.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27:577–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comin, D., E.L. Groshen, and J. Tracy. 2006. “Turbulent Firms, Turbulent Wages?” Staff Report No. 238. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

  • Congressional Budget Office. 2007. “Trends in Earnings Variability Over the Past 20 Years.” Report. U.S. Congress, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. 1999. “Foreward.” Pp. ix-xi in Time and Poverty in Western Welfare States: United Germany in Perspective, edited by L. Leisering and S. Leibfried. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, S.H. 2006. “Americás Persisting Poverty: What Research Says About How to Reduce It.” Paper presented at the National Poverty Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, February 21.

  • DeNavas-Walt, C., B.D. Proctor, and J.C. Smith. 2008. “Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2007.” U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports P60-235. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewilde, C. 2003. “A Life-Course Perspective on Social Exclusion and Poverty.” British Journal of Sociology 54:109–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.J. 1984. Years of Poverty, Years of Plenty: The Changing Economic Fortunes of American Workers and Families. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.J., B. Gustafsson, J.R. Hauser, G. Schmaus, S. Jenkins, H. Messinger, R. Muffels, B. Nolan, J. Ray, and W. Voges. 1995. “Poverty and Social-Assistance Dynamics in the United States, Canada, and Europe.” Pp. 109–51 in Poverty, Inequality and the Future of Social Policy: Western States in the New World Order, edited by K. McFate, R. Lawson, and W.J. Wilson. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.J., S.L. Hofferth, and F.P. Stafford. 2004. “Evolution and Change in Family Income, Wealth, and Health: The Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1968–2000 and Beyond.” Pp. 156–200 in A Telescope on Society: Survey Research and Social Science at the University of Michigan and Beyond, edited by J.S. House. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.J. and W. Rogers. 1991. “Has Childreńs Poverty Become More Persistent?” American Sociological Review 56:538–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynan, K., D.W. Elmendorf, and D.E. Sichel. 2008. “The Evolution of Household Income Volatility.” Report. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G.H. 1974. Children of the Great Depression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. “Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course.” Social Psychology Quarterly 57:4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1995. “The Life Course Paradigm: Social Change and Individual Development.” Pp. 101-40 in Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development, edited by P. Moen, G.H. Elder, and K. Luescher. New York: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve Board. 2008. “Federal Reserve Statistical Release: Consumer Credit, June 2008.” G.19 release. Washington, DC.

  • Fitzgerald, J., P. Gottschalk, and R. Moffitt. 1998. “An Analysis of Sample Attrition in Panel Data—The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamic.” Journal of Human Resources 33:251–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. and T.J. Shin. 2004. “The Shareholder Value Society: A Review of the Changes in Working Conditions and Inequality in the United States, 1976 to 2000.” Pp. 401–32 in Social Inequality, edited by K.M. Neckerman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin, P. 2008. High Wire: The Precarious Financial Lives of American Families. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, P. and S. Danziger. 1998. “Family Income Mobility—How Much Is There, and Has It Changed?” Pp. 92–111 in The Inequality Paradox: Growth of Income Disparity, edited by J.A. Auerbach and R.S. Belous. Washington, DC: National Policy Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, P. and R. Moffitt. 1999. “Changes in Job Instability and Insecurity Using Monthly Survey Data.” Journal of Labor Economics 17:S91-S126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourinchas, P.O. and J.A. Parker. 2002. “Consumption Over the Life Cycle.” Econometrica 70:47–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouskova, E. S.G. Heeringa, K. McGonagle, and R.F. Schoeni. 2008. “Panel Study of Income Dynamics Revised Longitudinal Weights 1993–2005.” Technical Report. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Gouskova, E. and R.F. Schoeni. 2007. “Comparing Estimates of Family Income in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and the March Current Population Survey, 1968–2005.” Report. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Hacker, J. 2004. “Privatizing Risk Without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98:243–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2006. The Great Risk Shift: Why American Jobs, Families, Health Care and Retirement Areńt Secure-And How We Can Fight Back. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. and E. Jacobs. 2008. “The Rising Instability of American Family Incomes, 1969-2004.” EPI Briefing Paper No. 213. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. 2003. Flat Broke With Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, T. 2007. “Changes in the Volatility of Household Income in the United States: A Regional Analysis.” Working Paper 2007–17 (prepared for the Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program). Department of Economics, American University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.S. 1992. The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A User's Guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoynes, H., M.E. Page, and A.H. Stevens. 2006. “Poverty in America: Trends and Explanations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20:47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, R. 1904. Poverty: Social Conscience in the Progressive Era. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, E.D. 2005. “The Life Course Perspective: A Promising Approach for Bridging the Micro and Macro Worlds for Social Workers.” Families in Society 86:143–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J. 2005. “Measuring Poverty: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations.” Measurement 3:208–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2006. Poverty in America: A Handbook. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jargowsky, P.A. 2003. “Stunning Progress, Hidden Problems: The Dramatic Decline of Concentrated Poverty in the 1990s.” Report, The Living Cities Census Series. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaler, S.G. and O.M. Rennert. 2008. Reducing the Impact of Poverty on Health and Human Development: Scientific Approaches. Boston: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L.A. 2000. Wealth in America: Trends in Wealth Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennickell, A.B. and M. Starr-McCluer. 1997. “Household Saving and Portfolio Change: Evidence From the 1983–89 Panel.” Review of Income and Wealth 43:381–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.S. and F.P. Stafford. 2000. “The Quality of the PSID Income Data in the 1990's and Beyond.” Panel Study of Income Dynamics Technical Paper Series. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J.P. and M.L. Moeschberger. 2003. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisering, L. and S. Leibfried. 1999. Time and Poverty in Western Welfare States: United Germany in Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K.U. and N.B. Tuma. 1990. “Life Course Research and Event History Analysis: An Overview.” Pp. 3–20 in Event History Analysis in Life Course Research, edited by K.U. Mayer and N.B. Tuma. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKernan, S.M. and C. Ratcliffe. 2005. “Events That Trigger Poverty Entries and Exits.” Social Science Quarterly 86:1146–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan S. and G. Sandefur. 1994. Growing Up With a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D. and J.X. Sullivan. 2003. “Measuring the Well-being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption.” Journal of Human Resources 38:1180–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2004. “The Effects of Welfare and Tax Reform: The Material Well-being of Single Mothers in the 1980s and 1990s.” Journal of Public Economics 88:1387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J. and C.E. Ross. 1999. “Economic Hardship Across the Life Course.” American Sociological Review 64:548–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. and R. Brumberg. 1954. “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An I nterpretation of Cross-Section Data.” Pp. 388–436 in Post-Keynesian Economics, edited by K.K. Kurihara. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., G.H. Elder, and K. Luscher. 1995. Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiri, K. and C.M. Suchindran. 1987. Life Table Techniques and Their Applications. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). 2007. User Guide. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Available online at http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/Guide/UG/tablcont.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadagno, J. 2005. One Nation, Uninsured: Why the U.S. Has No National Health Insurance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M.R. 2009. “Measuring the Economic Racial Divide Across the Course of American Lives.” Race and Social Problems 1:57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M.R. and T.A. Hirschl. 1999a. “The Economic Risk of Childhood in America: Estimating the Probability of Poverty Across the Formative Years.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 61: 1058–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1999b. “Estimating the Proportion of Americans Ever Experiencing Poverty During Their Elderly Years.” Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 54B:S184-S193.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1999c. “The Likelihood of Poverty Across the American Life Span.” Social Work 44:201–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1999a. “The Occurrence of Poverty Across the Life Cycle: Evidence From the PSID.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20:737–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1999b. “Rags or Riches? Estimating the Probabilities of Poverty and Af_ uence Across the Adult American Life Span.” Social Science Quarterly 82:651–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2002. “Welfare Use as a Life Course Event: Toward a New Understanding of the U.S. Safety Net.” Social Work 47:237–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M.R. and T.A. Hirschl. Forthcoming. “Estimating the Risk of Food Stamp Use and Impoverishment During Childhood.” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.

  • Rigg, J. and T. Sefton. 2004. “Income Dynamics and the Life Cycle.” CASE Paper No. 81. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.

  • Riley, M.W. 1999“Sociological Research on Age: Legacy and Challenge.” Aging and Society 19:123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, B.S. 1901. Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, P. 1990. Drawing the Line: Alternative Poverty Measures and Their Implications for Public Policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, J.E. 1997. Illusions of Opportunity: The American Dream in Question. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settersten, R.A. and K.U. Mayer. 1997. “The Measurement of Age, Age Structuring, and the Life Course.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:233–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slesnick, D.T. 1993. “Gaining Ground: Poverty in the Postwar United States.” Journal of Political Economy 101:1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T.M. 2005. “Public Policy, Economic Inequality, and Poverty: The United States in Comparative Perspective.” Social Science Quarterly 86:955–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solon, G., M.E. Page, and G.J. Duncan. 2000. “Correlations Between Neighboring Children in Their Subsequent Educational Attainment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 82:383–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. 2009. STATA/MP 10.1 for Windows. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A.H. 1999. “The Dynamics of Poverty Spells: Updating Bane and Ellwood.” Journal of Human Resources 34:557–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchitelle, L. 2006. The Disposable American: Layoffs and Their Consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2008. “Age and Sex of All People, Family Members and Unrelated Individuals Iterated by Income-to-Poverty Ratio and Race: 2007.” U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2008 Annual Social and Economic Supplement. Available online at http://www.census .gov/hhes/www/macro/032008/pov/new01_150_01.htm.

  • Voyer, J.P. 2004. “A Life-Course Approach to Social Policy Analysis: A Proposed Framework.” Discussion Paper. Policy Research Initiative, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. 1994. Poverty Dynamics: Issues and Examples. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E. and A.W. Tyagi. 2003. The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberi, D. 2006. Differences That Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Eastern Connecticut State University, Connecticut, USA

    Daniel A. Sandoval

  2. George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, 63130, St. Louis, MO

    Mark R. Rank

  3. Department of Development Sociology, Cornell University, Cornell, USA

    Thomas A. Hirschl

Authors
  1. Daniel A. Sandoval
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark R. Rank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas A. Hirschl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Rank.

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Greg Duncan, John Iceland, Jacob Hacker, Benjamin Page, Frank Stafford, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandoval, D.A., Rank, M.R. & Hirschl, T.A. The increasing risk of poverty across the American life course. Demography 46, 717–737 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0082

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0082

Keywords

  • Life Table
  • Census Bureau
  • Poverty Line
  • Poverty Rate
  • Panel Study