, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 817–827 | Cite as

Fertility effects of abortion and birth control pill access for minors

  • Melanie Guldi


This article empirically assesses whether age-restricted access to abortion and the birth control pill influence minors’ fertility in the United States. There is not a strong consensus in previous literature regarding the relationship between laws restricting minors’ access to abortion and minors’ birthrates. This is the first study to recognize that state laws in place prior to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision enabled minors to legally consent to surgical treatment—including abortion—in some states but not in others, and to construct abortion access variables reflecting this. In this article, age-specific policy variables measure either a minor’s legal ability to obtain an abortion or to obtain the birth control pill without parental involvement. I find fairly strong evidence that young women’s birthrates dropped as a result of abortion access as well as evidence that birth control pill access led to a drop in birthrates among whites.


Oral Contraceptive Parental Involvement Policy Variable NBER Working Paper Birth Control Pill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlof, G.A., J.L. Yellen, and M.L. Katz. 1996. “An Analysis of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in the United States.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111:277–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alan Guttmacher Institute. 1978. “Family Planning, Contraception, Voluntary Sterilization, and Abortion: An Analysis of Laws and Policies in the United States, Each State and Jurisdiction (as of October 1, 1976 with 1978 addenda).” A report of the Office for Family Planning, Bureau of Community Health Services, Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Alan Guttmacher Institute. 2003. The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy 6(1).Google Scholar
  4. Ananat, E.O., J. Gruber, and P.B. Levine. 2007. “Abortion Legalization and Life-Cycle Fertility.” Journal of Human Resources 42:375–97.Google Scholar
  5. Ananat, E.O., J. Gruber, P.B. Levine, and D. Staiger. 2006. “Abortion and Selection.” NBER Working Paper #12150. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Ananat, E.O. and D. Hungerman. 2007. “The Power of the Pill for the Next Generation.” NBER Working Paper #13402. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Angrist, J.D. and W.N. Evans. 1999. “Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of the 1970 State Abortion Reforms.” Research in Labor Economics 18:75–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey, M.J. 2006. “More Power to the Pill: The Impact of Contraceptive Freedom on Women’s Life Cycle Labor Supply.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121:289–320.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, G.S. 1960. “An Economic Analysis of Fertility.” Pp. 209–40 in Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, edited by A.J. Coale. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. — 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, G.S. and H.G. Lewis. 1973. “On the Interaction Between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 81(Suppl.):14–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertrand, M., E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan. 2004. “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119:249–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bitler, M. and M. Zavodny. 2001. “The Effect of Abortion Restrictions on the Timing of Abortions.” Journal of Health Economics 20:1011–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. — 2002. “Did Abortion Legalization Reduce the Number of Unwanted Children? Evidence From Adoptions.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 34(1):25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blank, R.M., C.C. George, and R.A. London. 1996. “State Abortion Rates: The Impact of Policies, Providers, Politics, Demographics and Economic Environment.” Journal of Health Economics 15:513–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cartoof, V.G. and L.V. Klerman. 1986. “Parental Consent for Abortion: Impact of the Massachusetts Law.” American Journal of Public Health 76:397–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charles, K.K. and M. Stephens, Jr. 2006. “Abortion Legalization and Substance Use.” Journal of Law and Economics 49:481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Council of State Governments. 1972. Age of Majority. Lexington, KY: Iron Works Pike.Google Scholar
  19. —. 1973. Age of Majority (Updated). Lexington, KY: Iron Works Pike.Google Scholar
  20. Donohue III, J.J. and S.D. Levitt. 2001. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116:379–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foote, C.L. and C.F. Goetz. 2005. “Testing Economic Hypotheses With State-Level Data: A Comment on Donohue and Levitt (2001).” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper #05-15.Google Scholar
  22. Goldin, C. and L.F. Katz. 2002. “The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy 110:730–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenberger, M.D. and K. Connor. 1991. “Parental Notice and Consent for Abortion: Out of Step With Family Law Principles and Policies.” Family Planning Perspectives 23:31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gruber, J. 1994. “The Incidence of Mandated Maternity Benefi ts.” American Economic Review 84:622–41.Google Scholar
  25. Gruber, J., P.B. Levine, and D. Staiger. 1999. “Abortion Legalization and Child Living Circumstances: Who is the Marginal Child?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114:263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hass-Wilson, D. 1996. “The Impact of State Abortion Restrictions on Minors’ Demand for Abortions.” Journal of Human Resources 31:140–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heckman J.J. and R.J. Willis. 1975. “Estimation of a Stochastic Dynamic Model of Reproduction: An Econometric Approach.” Pp. 99–138 in Household Production and Consumption 1975, edited by N. Terleckyj. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Henshaw, S.K. and K. Kost. 1992. “Parental Involvement in Minors’ Abortion Decisions.” Family Planning Perspectives 24:196–207, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joyce, T. 2004. “Did Legalized Abortion Lower Crime?” Journal of Human Resources 39(1):1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Joyce, T. and R. Kaestner. 1996. “State Reproductive Policies and Adolescent Pregnancy Resolution: The Case of Parental Involvement Laws.” Journal of Health Economics 15:579–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joyce, T., R. Kaestner, and S. Colman. 2006. “Changes in Abortions and Births and the Texas Parental Notifi cation Law.” New England Journal of Medicine 354:1031–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kane, T.J. and D. Staiger. 1996. “Teen Motherhood and Abortion Access.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111:467–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levine, P.B. 2003. “Parental Involvement Laws and Fertility Behavior.” Journal of Health Economics 22(5):861–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. —. 2004. Sex and Consequences: Abortion, Public Policy, and the Economics of Fertility. Prince ton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Levine, P.B. and D. Staiger. 2002. “Abortion as Insurance.” NBER Working Paper #8813. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  36. Levine, P.B., D. Staiger, T.J. Kane, and D.J. Zimmerman. 1999. “Roe v. Wade and American Fertility.” American Journal of Public Health 89:199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lott, J.R. and J. Whitley. 2007. “Abortion and Crime: Unwanted Children and Out-of-Wedlock Births.” Economic Inquiry 45:304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Merz, J.F., C.A. Jackson, and J.A. Klerman. 1995. “A Review of Abortion Policy: Legality, Medicaid Funding, and Parental Involvement, 1967–1994.” Women’s Rights Law Reporter 17(1):1–61.Google Scholar
  39. Meyer, B.D. 1995. “Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13:151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pantano, J. 2007. “Unwanted Fertility, Contraceptive Technology and Crime: Exploiting a Natural Experiment in Access to The Pill.” CCPR Working Paper #028-07. California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  41. Paul, E.W. and H.F. Pilpel. 1979. “Teenagers Pregnancy: The Law in 1979.” Family Planning Perspectives 11:297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paul, E.W., H.F. Pilpel, and N.F. Wechsler. 1974. “Pregnancy, Teenagers and the Law, 1974.” Family Planning Perspectives 6:142–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. — 1976. “Pregnancy, Teenagers and the Law, 1976.” Family Planning Perspectives 8:16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pilpel, H.F. and N.F. Wechsler. 1969. “Birth Control, Teenagers and the Law.” Family Planning Perspectives 1:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. — 1971. “Birth Control, Teenagers and the Law: A New Look, 1971.” Family Planning Perspectives 3:337–45.Google Scholar
  46. Ranjit, N., A. Bankole, J.E. Darroch, and S. Singh. 2001. “Contraceptive Failure in the First Two Years of Use: Differences Across Socioeconomic Subgroups.” Family Planning Perspectives 33:19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reddy, D.M., R. Fleming, and C. Swain. 2002. “Effect of Mandatory Parental Notification on Adolescent Girls’ Use of Sexual Health Care Services.” Journal of the American Medical Association 288:710–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogers, J.L., R.F. Boruch, G.B. Stoms, and D. DeMoya. 1991. “Impact of the Minnesota Parental Notification Law on Abortion and Birth.” American Journal of Public Health 81:294–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sen, B. 2007. “State Abortion Restrictions and Child Fatal-Injury: An Exploratory Study.” Southern Economic Journal 73:553–74.Google Scholar
  50. Sklar, J. and B. Berkov. 1974. “Abortion, Illegitimacy, and the American Birth Rate.” Science 185:909–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. U.S. Department of Census. Intercensal Estimates of the Resident Population of States 1970 to 1980. Available online at http://www.censu1980/e7080sta.txt.Google Scholar
  52. U.S. Department of Census. 1970-1979 Population Estimates by Age, Sex, and Race, PE-19. Available online at Scholar
  53. U.S. Department of Health and Economic Welfare (DHEW) Center for Family Planning Program Development (Planned Parenthood-World Population). 1974. Family Planning, Contraception, and Voluntary Sterilization: An Analysis of Laws and Policies in the United States, Each State and Jurisdiction (as of September 1971).” U.S. DHEW Publication No. 74-16001, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), National Center for Health Statistics. Natality Detail File, 1968–1979: [United States] [Computer file]. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics [producer], 1969–1980. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002–2003.Google Scholar
  55. Willis, R.J. 1999. “A Theory of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing.” Journal of Political Economy 107(6, part 2):S33-S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zavodny, M. 2004. “Fertility and Parental Consent for Minors to Receive Contraceptives.” American Journal of Public Health 94:1347–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Guldi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMount Holyoke CollegeSouth Hadley

Personalised recommendations