Skip to main content

The geographic scale of Metropolitan racial segregation

Abstract

This article addresses an aspect of racial residential segregation that has been largely ignored in prior work: the issue of geographic scale. In some metropolitan areas, racial groups are segregated over large regions, with predominately white regions, predominately black regions, and so on, whereas in other areas, the separation of racial groups occurs over much shorter distances. Here we develop an approach—featuring the segregation profile and the corresponding macro/micro segregation ratio—that offers a scale-sensitive alternative to standard methodological practice for describing segregation. Using this approach, we measure and describe the geographic scale of racial segregation in the 40 largest U.S. metropolitan areas in 2000. We find considerable heterogeneity in the geographic scale of segregation patterns across both metropolitan areas and racial groups, a heterogeneity that is not evident using conventional “aspatial” segregation measures. Moreover, because the geographic scale of segregation is only modestly correlated with the level of segregation in our sample, we argue that geographic scale represents a distinct dimension of residential segregation. We conclude with a brief discussion of the implications of our findings for investigating the patterns, causes, and consequences of residential segregation at different geographic scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Charles, C.Z. 2003. “The Dynamics of Racial Residential Segregation.” Annual Review of Sociology 29:167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Environmental Systems Research Institute. 2005. ArcGIS: Release 9.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farley, R. and W.H. Frey. 1994. “Changes in the Segregation of Whites From Blacks During the 1980s: Small Steps Toward a More Integrated Society.” American Sociological Review 59:23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer, C.S., G. Stockmayer, J. Stiles, and M. Hout. 2004. “Distinguishing the Geographic Levels and Social Dimensions of U.S. Metropolitan Segregation, 1960–2000.” Demography 41:37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. GeoLytics. 2003. Census 2000 Short Form Blocks. East Brunswick, NJ: GeoLytics, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grannis, R. 1998. “The Importance of Trivial Streets: Residential Streets and Residential Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology 103:1530–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. — 2002. “Discussion: Segregation Indices and Their Functional Inputs.” Sociological Methodology 32:69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu, P.S. and T.R. Reuscher. 2004. “Summary of Travel Trends: 2001 National Household Travel Survey.” Report. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iceland, J., D. Weinberg, and E. Steinmetz. 2002. “Racial and Ethnic Segregation in the United States: 1980–2000.” Census 2000 Special Report. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jargowsky, P.A. and J. Kim. 2005. “A Measure of Spatial Segregation: The Generalized Neighborhood Sorting Index.” Working Paper No. 05-03. National Poverty Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan, D.H. and S.R. Holloway. 2001. “Scaling Ethnic Segregation: Causal Processes and Contingent Outcomes in Chinese Residential Patterns.” GeoJournal 53:59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krysan, M. and R. Farley. 2002. “The Residential Preferences of Blacks: Do They Explain Persistent Segregation?” Social Forces 80:937–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, B.A., S.F. Reardon, G. Firebaugh, C.R. Farrell, S.A. Matthews, and D. O’Sullivan. Forthcoming. “Beyond the Census Tract: Patterns and Determinants of Racial Residential Segregation at Multiple Geographic Scales.” American Sociological Review.

  14. Logan, J.R., B.J. Stults, and R. Farley. 2004. “Segregation of Minorities in the Metropolis: Two Decades of Change.” Demography 41:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Massey, D. S. and N.A. Denton. 1987. “Trends in the Residential Segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970–1980.” American Sociological Review 52:802–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. —. 1988. “The Dimensions of Residential Segregation.” Social Forces 67:281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. —. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Massey, D.S. and M.J. Fischer. 2003. “The Geography of Inequality in the United States, 1950–2000.” Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2003(4):1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Massey, D.S. and Z.L. Hajnal. 1995. “The Changing Geographic Structure of Black-White Segregation in the United States.” Social Science Quarterly 76:527–42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morrill, R.L. 1991. “On the Measure of Spatial Segregation.” Geography Research Forum 11:25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Center for Transit Research. 2005. “Public Transit in America: Results From the 2001 National Household Travel Survey.” Report No. FDOT BC137-48; NCTR 527-09. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pielou, E.C. 1977. Mathematical Ecology, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reardon, S.F. and G. Firebaugh. 2002. “Measures of Multi-group Segregation.” Sociological Methodology 32:33–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reardon, S.F. and D. O’Sullivan. 2004. “Measures of Spatial Segregation.” Sociological Methodology 34:121–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reardon, S.F., J.T. Yun, and T.M. Eitle. 2000. “The Changing Structure of School Segregation: Measurement and Evidence of Multi-Racial Metropolitan Area School Segregation, 1989–1995.” Demography 37:351–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sastry, N., A.R. Pebley, and M. Zonta. 2002. “Neighborhood Definitions and the Spatial Dimension of Daily Life in Los Angeles.” Working Paper No. ccpr-033-04. California Center for Population Research, UCLA. Available online at http://www.ccpr.ucla.edu/asp/index.asp.

  27. Smith, N. 2000. “Scale.” Pp. 724–27 in The Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th ed., edited by R.J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, and M. Watts. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Taeuber, K.E. and A.F. Taeuber. 1965. Negroes in Cities: Residential Segregation and Neighborhood Change. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Theil, H. 1972. Statistical Decomposition Analysis, Vol. 14. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Timberlake, J.M. 2002. “Separate, But How Unequal? Ethnic Residential Strati cation, 1980 to 1990.” City and Community 1:251–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tobler, W.R. 1979. “Smooth Pycnophylactic Interpolation for Geographical Regions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:519–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Turner, M.A., S.L. Ross, G.C. Galster, and J. Yinger. 2002. “Discrimination in Metropolitan Housing Markets: National Results From Phase I HDS 2000” [Electronic version]. Available online at http://www.huduser.org/publications/hsg n/hds.html.

  33. White, M.J. 1983. “The Measurement of Spatial Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology 88:1008–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wong, D.W.S. 1993. “Spatial Indices of Segregation.” Urban Studies 30:559–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. — 1997. “Spatial Dependency of Segregation Indices.” The Canadian Geographer 41:128–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. — 1999. “Geostatistics as Measures of Spatial Segregation.” Urban Geography 20:635–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. — 2004. “Comparing Traditional and Spatial Segregation Measures: A Spatial Scale Perspective.” Urban Geography 25:66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu, X.B., and D.Z. Sui. 2001. “An Initial Exploration of a Lacunarity-Based Segregation Measure.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28:433–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yinger, J. 1995. Closed Doors, Opportunities Lost: The Continuing Costs of Housing Discrimination. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean F. Reardon.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grants SES-0520400 [Reardon] and SES-0520405 [Matthews]) and the William T. Grant Foundation (Reardon). We thank Steve Graham and Yosef Bodovski for writing the code to compute the spatial segregation measures used here. All errors remain our own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reardon, S.F., Matthews, S.A., O’Sullivan, D. et al. The geographic scale of Metropolitan racial segregation. Demography 45, 489–514 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0019

Download citation