This article investigates how migrant social capital differentially influences individuals’ migration and cumulatively generates divergent outcomes for communities. To combine the fragmented findings in the literature, the article proposes a framework that decomposes migrant social capital into resources (information about or assistance with migration), sources (prior migrants), and recipients (potential migrants). Analysis of multilevel and longitudinal data from 22 rural villages in Thailand shows that the probability of internal migration increases with the available resources, yet the magnitude of increase depends on recipients’ characteristics and the strength of their ties to sources. Specifically, individuals become more likely to migrate if migrant social capital resources are greater and more accessible. The diversity of resources by occupation increases the likelihood of migration, while diversity by destination inhibits it. Resources from weakly tied sources, such as village members, have a higher effect on migration than resources from strongly tied sources in the household. Finally, the importance of resources for migration declines with recipients’ own migration experience. These findings challenge the mainstream account of migrant social capital as a uniform resource that generates similar migration outcomes for different groups of individuals or in different settings. In Nang Rong villages, depending on the configuration of resources, sources, and recipients, migrant social capital leads to differential migration outcomes for individuals and divergent cumulative migration patterns in communities.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Arizpe, L. 1975. Indigenas en la Ciudad de Mexico: El Caso de Las Marias [Indigenous in Mexico City: The case of“Las Marias”]. Mexico City: Secretaria de Educacion Publica.
Bello, W., S. Cunningham, and L.K. Poh. 1998. A Siamese Tragedy: Development and Disintegration in Modern Thailand. London: Zed Books, Ltd.
Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 241 -58 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J.G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood Press.
Burt, R. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chamratrithirong, A., K. Archavanitkul, K. Richter, P. Guest, T. Varachai, W. Boonchalaksi, N. Piriyathamwong, and P. Vong-ek. 1995. National Migration Survey of Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University.
Coleman, J. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94(suppl.):S95-S120.
Curran, S., F. Garip, and C. Chung. 2005. “Advancing Theory and Evidence About Migration and Cumulative Causation: Destination and Gender in Thailand.” CMD Working Paper No. 357. Center for Migration and Development, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Curran, S., F. Garip, C. Chung, and K. Tangchonlatip. 2005. “Gendered Migrant Social Capital: Evidence From Thailand.” Social Forces 84:225–55.
Curran, S. and E. Rivero-Fuentes. 2003. “Engendering Migrant Networks: The Case of Mexican Migration.” Demography 40:289–307.
Davis, B., G. Stecklov, and P. Winters. 2002. “Domestic and International Migration From Rural Mexico: Disaggregating the Effects of Network Structure and Composition.” Population Studies 56:291–309.
Deléchat, C. 2001. “International Migration Dynamics: The Role of Experience and Social Networks.” Labour 15:457–86.
De Jong, G., K. Richter, and P. Isarabhakdi. 1996. “Gender, Values, and Intentions to Move in Rural Thailand.” International Migration Review 30:748–70.
Dunlevy, J.A. 1991. “On the Settlement Patterns of Recent Caribbean and Latin Immigrants to the United States.” Growth Change 22(1):54–67.
Fussell, E. and D. Massey. 2004. “The Limits to Cumulative Causation: International Migration From Mexican Urban Areas.” Demography 41:151–71.
Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–80.
Hafner, J. 2000. “Thailand.” Pp. 434–68 in Southeast Asia Diversity and Development, edited by T. Leinbach and R. Ulack. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Jansen, K. 1997. External Finance in Thailands Development: An Interpretation of Thailands Growth Boom. New York: St. Martins Press.
Kanaiaupuni, S. 2000. “Reframing the Migration Question: An Analysis of Men, Women, and Gender in Mexico.” Social Forces 78:1311–47.
Lin, N. 2000. “Inequality in Social Capital.” Contemporary Sociology 29:785–95.
— 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, N., W.N. Vaughn, and J.C. Ensel. 1981. “Social Resources and Strength of Ties.” American Sociological Review 46:393–405.
Lomnitz, L.A. 1977. Networks and Marginality: Life in a Mexican Shantytown. New York: Academic Press.
Massey, D. 1990. “Social Structure, Household Strategies, and the Cumulative Causation of Migration.” Population Index 56:3–26.
Massey, D., J. Ariango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, and J. Taylor. 1993. “Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal.” Population and Development Review 19:431–66.
Massey, D. and K.E. Espinosa. 1997. “What’s Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 102:939–99.
Massey, D. and F. García-España. 1987. “The Social Process of International Migration.” Science 237:733–38.
Massey, D., L. Goldring, and J. Durand. 1994. “Continuities in Transnational Migration: An Analysis of Nineteen Mexican Communities.” American Journal of Sociology 99:1492–533.
Massey, D. and R. Zenteno. 1999. “The Dynamics of Mass Migration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:5328–35.
Mills, M.B. 1997. Thai Women in the Global Labor Force: Consuming Desires, Contested Selves. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. Kunter. 1990. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 3rd ed. Boston: Irwin.
Palloni, A., D. Massey, M. Ceballos, K. Espinosa, and M. Spittel. 2001. “Social Capital and International Migration: A Test Using Information on Family Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 106:1262–98.
Portes, A. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:1–24.
Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rasbash, J., F. Steele, W. Browne, and B. Prosser. 2005. A User’s Guide to MlwiN, version 2.0. London: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
Rindfuss, R., T. Kaneda, A. Chattopadhyay, and C. Sethaput. 2007. “Panel Studies and Migration.” Social Science Research 36:374–403.
Shannon, C. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27:379–422, 623–56.
Short, S. 2006. “Focus Group Interviews.” Pp. 103–16 in A Handbook for Social Science Field Research: Essays and Bibliographic Sources on Research Design, Methodology, and Fieldwork, edited by E. Perecman and S. Curran. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stark, O. and E. Taylor. 1989. “Relative Deprivation and International Migration.” Demography 26:1–14.
Suksiriserekul, S. 2000. “Responses of Thai Households and the Thai Government in Coping With the Social Impacts of the Economic Crisis.” Pp. 221–28 in Globalization and the Asian Economic Crisis: Indigenous Responses, Coping Strategies, and Governance Reform in Southeast Asia, edited by G. Hainsworth. Vancouver, Canada: Centre for Southeast Asia Research, Institute for Asian Research.
Tambunlertchai, S. 1990. A Profile of Provincial Industries. Bangkok, Thailand: Thailand Development Research Institute.
Taylor, J.E. 1986. “Differential Migration, Networks, Information and Risk.” Pp. 147–71 in Research in Human Capital and Development, Vol. 4, edited by O. Stark. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Warr, P. and B. Nidhiprabha. 1996. Thailands Macroeconomic Miracle: Stable Adjustment and Sustained Growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Winters, P., A. de Janvry, and E. Sadoulet. 2001. “Family and Community Networks in Mexico-U.S. Migration.” Journal of Human Resources 36:159–85.
This research was funded by research grants from Program in Urbanization and Migration at Princeton University and the National Science Foundation (#SES-0525942). I am grateful to Renelinda Arana, Debbie Becher, Coral Celeste, Chang Chung, Sara Curran, Paul DiMaggio, Doug Massey, Steven Shafer, Amy Sullivan, Marta Tienda, Bruce Western, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. This research is based on data from the Nang Rong Survey, a collaborative effort between investigators at the University of North Carolina, Carolina Population Center, and investigators at the Institute for Population and Social Research (IPSR), Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand. It is partially funded by Grant R01- HD25482 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Persons interested in obtaining data files from the Nang Rong Survey Project should contact The Nang Rong Survey Project, Carolina Population Center, 123 W. Franklin Street, CB# 8120, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3997 (email@example.com).
About this article
Cite this article
Garip, F. Social capital and migration: How do similar resources lead to divergent outcomes?. Demography 45, 591–617 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0016
- Social Capital
- Potential Migrant
- Migration Decision
- Destination Diversity
- Migration Outcome