, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 439–460 | Cite as

Risk preferences and the timing of marriage and childbearing

  • Lucie Schmidt


The existing literature on marriage and fertility decisions pays little attention to the roles played by risk preferences and uncertainty. However, given uncertainty regarding the availability of suitable marriage partners, the ability to contracept, and the ability to conceive, women’s risk preferences might be expected to play an important role in marriage and fertility timing decisions. By using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), I find that measured risk preferences have a significant effect on the timing of both marriage and fertility. Highly risk-tolerant women are more likely to delay marriage, consistent with either a search model of marriage or a risk-pooling explanation. In addition, risk preferences affect fertility timing in a way that differs by marital status and education, and that varies over the life cycle. Greater tolerance for risk leads to earlier births at young ages, consistent with these women being less likely to contracept effectively. In addition, as the subgroup of college-educated, unmarried women nears the end of their fertile periods, highly risk-tolerant women are likely to delay childbearing relative to their more risk-averse counterparts and are therefore less likely to become mothers. These findings may have broader implications for both individual and societal well-being.


Risk Preference Risk Tolerance Unmarried Woman Duration Dependence Fertile Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amuedo-Dorantes, C. and J. Kimmel. 2005. “The Motherhood Wage Gap for Women in the United States: The Importance of College and Fertility Delay.” Review of Economics of the Household 3(1):17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barsky, R.B., F.T. Juster, M.S. Kimball, and M.D. Shapiro. 1997. “Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:537–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G.S. 1974. “A Theory of Marriage.” Pp. 299–344 in Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital, edited by T.W. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (for NBER).Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G., E. Landes, and R. Michael. 1977. “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability.” Journal of Political Economy 86:1141–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackburn, M., D. Bloom, and D. Neumark. 1993. “Fertility Timing, Wages, and Human Capital.” Journal of Population Economics 6:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratko, D. and A. Butković. 2002. “Family Study of Sensation Seeking.” Personality and Individual Differences 34:1–12.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, C., G.J. Duncan, and F.P. Stafford. 1996. “Data Watch: The Panel Study of Income Dynamics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10:155–68.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J.R. 2001. “Private Pensions, Mortality Risk, and the Decision to Annuitize.” Journal of Public Economics 82:29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caucutt, E.M., N. Guner, and J. Knowles. 2002. “Why Do Women Wait? Matching, Wage Inequality, and the Incentives for Fertility Delay.” Review of Economic Dynamics 5:815–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charles, K.K. and E. Hurst. 2003. “The Correlation of Wealth Across Generations.” Journal of Political Economy 111:1155–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conesa, J.C. 1999. “Educational Attainment and Timing of Fertility Decisions.” Unpublished manuscript. Universitat de Barcelona and University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  12. Cooney, T.M. and D.P. Hogan. 1991. “Marriage in an Institutionalized Life Course: First Marriages Among American Men in the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:178–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cullen, J.B. and J. Gruber. 2000. “Does Unemployment Insurance Crowd Out Spousal Labor Supply?” Journal of Labor Economics 18:546–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckel, C.C. and P.J. Grossman. 2002. “Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes Toward Financial Risk.” Evolution and Human Behavior 23:281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feinberg, R.M. 1977. “Risk Aversion, Risk, and the Duration of Unemployment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 59:264–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster, A.D. and M.R. Rosenzweig. 2001. “Imperfect Commitment, Altruism, and the Family: Evidence From Transfer Behavior in Low-Income Rural Areas.” Review of Economics and Statistics. 83:389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glicksohn, J. and H. Golan. 2001. “Personality, Cognitive Style, and Assortative Mating.” Personality and Individual Differences 30:1199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heckman, J.J. and R.J. Willis. 1976. “Estimation of a Stochastic Model of Reproduction: An Econometric Approach.” Pp. 99–145 in Household Production and Consumption, edited by N. Terleckyj. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, M. 1992. The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A User’s Guide. Newbury, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Hotz, V.J., J. Klerman, and R.J. Willis. 1997. “The Economics of Fertility in Developed Countries.” Pp. 275–347 in Handbook of Population and Family Economics, edited by M.R. Rosenzweig and O. Stark. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Hudson, D., K. Coble, and J. Lusk. 2005. “Consistency of Risk Premium Measures.” Agricultural Economics 33:41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loughran, D.S. 2002. “The Effect of Male Wage Inequality on Female Age at First Marriage.” Review of Economics and Statistics 84:237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lundberg, S., J. Romich, and K.P. Tsang. 2007. “Decision-making by the Children of the NLSY.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  24. Luoh, M.-C. and F. Stafford. 1997. “Estimating Risk Tolerance From the 1996 PSID.” Online document available at Scholar
  25. Lusardi, A. 1998. “On the Importance of the Precautionary Saving Motive.” American Economic Review 88:449–54.Google Scholar
  26. Mazzocco, M. 2004. “Savings, Risk Sharing, and Preferences for Risk.” American Economic Review 94:1169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Michael, R.T. and R.J. Willis. 1976. “Contraception and Fertility: Household Production Under Uncertainty.” Pp. 27–98 in Household Production and Consumption, edited by N. Terleckyj. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, A.R. 2005. “The Effects of Motherhood Timing on Career Path.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  29. Mischel, W. 1968. Personality and Assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Mullin, C.H. and P. Wang. 2002. “The Timing of Childbearing Among Heterogeneous Women in Dynamic General Equilibrium.” NBER Working Paper 9231. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Oppenheimer, V.K., M. Kalmijn, and N. Lim. 1997. “Men’s Career Development and Marriage Timing During a Period of Rising Inequality.” Demography 34:311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pissarides, C.A. 1974. “Risk, Job Search, and Income Distribution.” Journal of Political Economy 82:1255–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenzweig, M.R. 1988. “Risk, Implicit Contracts and the Family in Rural Areas of Low-Income Countries.” Economic Journal 98:1148–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenzweig, M.R. and O. Stark. 1989. “Consumption Smoothing, Migration, and Marriage: Evidence From Rural India.” Journal of Political Economy 97:905–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sahm, C.R. 2006. “Does Risk Tolerance Change?” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  36. Schmidt, L. 2007. “Murphy Brown Revisited: Human Capital, Search, and Nonmarital Childbearing Among Educated Women.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, Williams College.Google Scholar
  37. Shroder, M. 2001. “What Makes a Landlord? Ownership of Real Estate by US Households.” Urban Studies 38:1069–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spivey, C. 2007. “Desperation or Desire? The Role of Risk Aversion in Marriage.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.Google Scholar
  39. Stephens, M. 2002. “Worker Displacement and the Added Worker Effect.” Journal of Labor Economics 20:504–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weinstein, M., J.W. Wood, M.A. Stoto, and D.D. Greenfield. 1990. “Components of Age-Specific Fecundability.” Population Studies 44:447–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucie Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsWilliams CollegeWilliamstown

Personalised recommendations