Demography

, Volume 47, Supplement 1, pp S211–S231 | Cite as

Disease prevalence, disease incidence, and mortality in the United States and in England

Article

Abstract

We find that both disease incidence and disease prevalence are higher among Americans in age groups 55–64 and 70–80, indicating that Americans suffer from higher past cumulative disease risk and experience higher immediate risk of new disease onset compared with the English. In contrast, age-specific mortality rates are similar in the two countries, with an even higher risk among the English after age 65. We also examine reasons for the large financial gradients in mortality in the two countries. Among 55- to 64-year-olds, we estimate similar health gradients in income and wealth in both countries, but for 70- to 80-year-olds, we find no income gradient in the United Kingdom. Standard behavioral risk factor’s (work, marriage, obesity, exercise, and smoking) almost fully explain income gradients among those aged 55–64 in both countries and a significant part among Americans 70–80 years old. The most likely explanation of the absence of an English income gradient relates to the English income benefit system: below the median, retirement benefits are largely flat and independent of past income, and hence past health, during the working years. Finally, we report evidence using a long panel of American respondents that their subsequent mortality is not related to large changes in wealth experienced during the prior 10-year period.

References

  1. Adler, N.E. and D.H. Rehkopf. 2008. “U.S. Disparities in Health: Descriptions, Causes, and Mechanisms.”Annual Review of Public Health 29: 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arias, E. 2004. “United States Life Tables, 2002.”National Vital Statistics Reports 53(6). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. Avendano, M., M. Glymour, J. Banks, and J. Mackenbach. 2009. “Health Disadvantage in US Adults Aged 50–74: Are Poor Europeans Healthier Than Americans?”American Journal of Public Health 99: 540–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, J., M. Marmot, Z. Oldfield, and J.P. Smith. 2006. “Disease and Disadvantage in the United States and in England.”Journal of the American Medical Association 295: 2037–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. —. 2009. “SES and Health on Both Sides of the Atlantic.” Pp. 359–406 inDevelopments in the Economics of Aging, edited by D. Wise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cutler, D.M. and E. Meara. 1998. “The Medical Costs of the Young and Old: A Forty-Year Perspective.” Pp. 215–46 inFrontiers in the Economics of Aging, edited by D.A. Wise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fonseca, R., P.-C. Michaud, T. Galama, and A. Kapteyn. 2009. “On the Rise of Health Spending and Longevity.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 4622. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  8. Jin, L. and N.A. Christakis. 2009. “Investigating the Mechanism of Marital Mortality Reduction: The Transition to Widowhood and Quality of Health Care.”Demography 46: 605–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Juster, F.T. and J.P. Smith. 1997. “Improving the Quality of Economic Data: Lessons From the HRS and AHEAD.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 92: 1268–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Juster, F.T. and R. Suzman. 1995. “An Overview of the Health and Retirement Study.”Journal of Human Resources 30: S7-S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kitagawa, E.M. and P. Hauser. 1973.Differential Mortality in the United States: A Study in Socio-Economic Epidemiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lynch, J., S. Harper, G.A. Kaplan, and G.D. Smith. 2004. “Associations Between Income Inequality and Mortality Among U.S. States: The Importance of Time Period and Source of Income Data.”American Journal of Public Health 95: 1424–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Manton, K. and J. Vaupel. 1995. “Survival After Age 80 in the United States, Sweden, France, England, and Japan.”New England Journal of Medicine 333: 1232–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Melia, J., S. Moss, and L. Johns. 2004. “Rates of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing in General Practice in England and Wales in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.”British Journal of Urology International 94: 51–56.Google Scholar
  15. Mirowsky, J. and C. Ross. 2003.Education, Social Status, and Health. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. Office for National Statistics (ONS). 2010. Period and Cohort Life Expectancy Tables (available online at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/Product.asp?vlnk=15098).Google Scholar
  17. Preston, S.H. and J.Y. Ho. 2009a. “Low Life Expectancy in the United States—Is the Health Care System at Fault?” NBER Working Paper 15213. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. -. 2009b. “US Mortality in an International Context: Age Variations.” PSC Working Paper Series PSC-09-04, Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  19. Rogers, R.G., R.A. Hummer, and C.B. Nam. 2000.Living and Dying in the USA: Behavioral, Health, and Social Differentials of Adult Mortality. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sirovich, B.E., L.M. Schwartz, and S. Woloshin. 2003. “Screening Men for Prostate and Colorectal Cancer in the United States: Does Practice Reflect the Evidence?”Journal of the American Medical Association 289: 1414–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, J.P. 1999. “Healthy Bodies and Thick Wallets: The Dual Relation Between Health and Economic Status.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 13: 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. —. 2004. “Unraveling the SES-Health Connection.”Population and Development Review Supplement: Aging, Health and Public Policy: Demographic and Economic Perspectives 30: 108–32.Google Scholar
  23. Waite, L. and M. Gallagher. 2000.The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Banks
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alastair Muriel
    • 2
  • James P. Smith
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity ManchesterUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Fiscal StudiesLondon
  3. 3.The RAND CorporationSanta Monica

Personalised recommendations