, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 55–77 | Cite as

The neighborhood context of racial and ethnic disparities in arrest

  • David S. Kirk


This study assesses the role of social context in explaining racial and ethnic disparities in arrest, with a focus on how distinct neighborhood contexts in which different racial and ethnic groups reside explain variations in criminal outcomes. To do so, I utilize a multilevel, longitudinal research design, combining individual-level data with contextual data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN). Findings reveal that black youths face multiple layers of disadvantage relative to other racial and ethnic groups, and these layers work to create differences in arrest. At the family level, results show that disadvantages in the form of unstable family structures explain much of the disparities in arrest across race and ethnicity. At the neighborhood level, black youths tend to reside in areas with both significantly higher levels of concentrated poverty than other youths as well as lower levels of collective efficacy than white youths. Variations in neighborhood tolerance of deviance across groups explain little of the arrest disparities, yet tolerance of deviance does influence the frequency with which a crime ultimately ends in an arrest. Even after accounting for relevant demographic, family, and neighborhood-level predictors, substantial residual arrest differences remain between black youths and youths of other racial and ethnic groups.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, E. 1999. Code of the Street. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Blinder, A. 1973. “Wage Discrimination: Reduced-Form and Structural Variables.” Journal of Human Resources 8:436–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumstein, A. 1982. “On the Racial Disproportionality of United States’ Prison Populations.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 73:1259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton, L. and R. Jarrett. 2000. “In the Mix, Yet on the Margins: The Place of Families in Urban Neighborhood and Child Development Research.” Journal of Marriage and Family 62:1114–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambliss, W. and R. Nagasawa. 1969. “On the Validity of Official Statistics: A Comparative Study of White, Black, and Japanese High-School Boys.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 6:71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, T.D., S.C. Shagle, and S.M. Degirmencioglu. 1997. “Capturing Social Process for Testing Mediational Models of Neighborhood Effects.” Pp. 94–119 in Neighborhood Poverty, Vol. II, edited by J. Brooks-Gunn, G.J. Duncan, and J.L. Aber. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Duncan, G.J. and J. Brooks-Gunn. 1997. Consequences of Growing Up Poor. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Duncan, G.J., J. Brooks-Gunn, and P.K. Klebanov. 1994. “Economic Deprivation and Early-Childhood Development.” Child Development 65:296–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan, G.J. and S.W. Raudenbush. 2001. “Neighborhoods and Adolescent Development: How Can We Determine the Links?” Pp. 10–36 in Does It Take A Village? Community Effects on Children, Adolescents, and Families, edited by A. Booth and N. Crouter. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Hindelang, M.J. 1978. “Race and Involvement in Common Law Personal Crimes.” American Sociological Review 43:93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, F.L. and J. Kelley. 1984. “Decomposing Differences Between Groups: A Cautionary Note on Measuring Discrimination.” Sociological Methods and Research 12:323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirk, D.S. 2006. “Examining the Divergence Across Self-Report and Official Data Sources on Inferences About the Adolescent Life-Course of Crime.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 22:107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loeber, R. and M. Stouthamer-Loeber. 1986. “Family Factors as Correlates and Predictors of Juvenile Conduct Problems and Delinquency.” Pp. 29–149 in Crime and Justice, Vol. 7, edited by M. Tonry and N. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Matsueda, R.L., K. Drakulich, and C.E. Kubrin. 2006. “Race and Neighborhood Codes of Violence.” Pp. 334–56 in The Many Colors of Crime: Inequalities of Race, Ethnicity and Crime in America, edited by R.D. Peterson, L.J. Krivo, and J. Hagan. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. McLeod, J.D., C. Kruttschnitt, and M. Dornfeld. 1994. “Does Parenting Explain the Effects of Structural Conditions on Children’s Antisocial Behavior? A Comparison of Blacks and Whites.” Social Forces 73:575–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McNulty, T.L. and P.E. Bellair. 2003. “Explaining Racial and Ethnic Differences in Serious Adolescent Violent Behavior.” Criminology 41:709–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moos, R.H. and B.S. Moos. 1986. Family Environment Scale Manual. 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  18. Oaxaca, R. 1973. “Male-Female Wage Differences in Urban Labor Markets.” International Economic Review 14:693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osgood, D.W., B.J. McMorris, and M.T. Potenza. 2002. “Analyzing Multiple-Item Measures of Crime and Deviance I: Item Response Theory Scaling.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18:267–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peterson, R.D. and L.J. Krivo. 2005. “Macrostructural Analysis of Race, Ethnicity, and Violent Crime: Recent Lessons and New Directions for Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 31:311–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rabe-Hesketh, S., A. Skrondal, and A. Pickles. 2004. “GLLAMM Manual.” Working Paper 160. University of California-Berkeley, Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  22. Raudenbush, S.W. and A.S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Sampson, R.J. 1987. “Urban Black Violence: The Effect of Male Joblessness and Family Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 93:348–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sampson, R.J. and D.J. Bartusch. 1998. “Legal Cynicism and (Subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighborhood Context of Racial Differences.” Law and Society Review 32:777–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sampson, R.J. and J.H. Laub. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sampson, R.J., J.D. Morenoff, and S.W. Raudenbush. 2005. “Social Anatomy of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Violence.” American Journal of Public Health 95:224–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sampson, R.J., S.W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy.” Science 227:918–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sampson, R.J. and W.J. Wilson. 1995. “Toward a Theory of Race, Crime, and Urban Inequality.” Pp. 37–56 in Crime and Inequality, edited by J. Hagan and R.D. Peterson. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Shaw, C. and H. McKay. 1942. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wells, L.E. and J.H. Rankin. 1991. “Families and Delinquency: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Broken Homes.” Social Problems 38:71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yun, M.-S. 2004. “Decomposing Differences in the First Moment.” Economics Letters 82:275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David S. Kirk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations