The neighborhood context of racial and ethnic disparities in arrest
- 341 Downloads
This study assesses the role of social context in explaining racial and ethnic disparities in arrest, with a focus on how distinct neighborhood contexts in which different racial and ethnic groups reside explain variations in criminal outcomes. To do so, I utilize a multilevel, longitudinal research design, combining individual-level data with contextual data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN). Findings reveal that black youths face multiple layers of disadvantage relative to other racial and ethnic groups, and these layers work to create differences in arrest. At the family level, results show that disadvantages in the form of unstable family structures explain much of the disparities in arrest across race and ethnicity. At the neighborhood level, black youths tend to reside in areas with both significantly higher levels of concentrated poverty than other youths as well as lower levels of collective efficacy than white youths. Variations in neighborhood tolerance of deviance across groups explain little of the arrest disparities, yet tolerance of deviance does influence the frequency with which a crime ultimately ends in an arrest. Even after accounting for relevant demographic, family, and neighborhood-level predictors, substantial residual arrest differences remain between black youths and youths of other racial and ethnic groups.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anderson, E. 1999. Code of the Street. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Cook, T.D., S.C. Shagle, and S.M. Degirmencioglu. 1997. “Capturing Social Process for Testing Mediational Models of Neighborhood Effects.” Pp. 94–119 in Neighborhood Poverty, Vol. II, edited by J. Brooks-Gunn, G.J. Duncan, and J.L. Aber. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Duncan, G.J. and J. Brooks-Gunn. 1997. Consequences of Growing Up Poor. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Duncan, G.J. and S.W. Raudenbush. 2001. “Neighborhoods and Adolescent Development: How Can We Determine the Links?” Pp. 10–36 in Does It Take A Village? Community Effects on Children, Adolescents, and Families, edited by A. Booth and N. Crouter. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Loeber, R. and M. Stouthamer-Loeber. 1986. “Family Factors as Correlates and Predictors of Juvenile Conduct Problems and Delinquency.” Pp. 29–149 in Crime and Justice, Vol. 7, edited by M. Tonry and N. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Matsueda, R.L., K. Drakulich, and C.E. Kubrin. 2006. “Race and Neighborhood Codes of Violence.” Pp. 334–56 in The Many Colors of Crime: Inequalities of Race, Ethnicity and Crime in America, edited by R.D. Peterson, L.J. Krivo, and J. Hagan. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Moos, R.H. and B.S. Moos. 1986. Family Environment Scale Manual. 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Rabe-Hesketh, S., A. Skrondal, and A. Pickles. 2004. “GLLAMM Manual.” Working Paper 160. University of California-Berkeley, Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S.W. and A.S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Sampson, R.J. and J.H. Laub. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sampson, R.J. and W.J. Wilson. 1995. “Toward a Theory of Race, Crime, and Urban Inequality.” Pp. 37–56 in Crime and Inequality, edited by J. Hagan and R.D. Peterson. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shaw, C. and H. McKay. 1942. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar