Using subjective expectations to forecast longevity: do survey respondents know something we don’t know?
Old-age mortality is notoriously dif cult to predict because it requires not only an understanding of the process of senescence—which is influenced by genetic, environmental, and behavioral factors—but also a prediction of how these factors will evolve. In this paper, I argue that individuals are uniquely qualified to predict their own mortality based on their own genetic background, as well as environmental and behavioral risk factors that are often known only to the individual. Given this private information, individuals form expectations about survival probabilities that may provide additional information to demographers and policymakers in their challenge to predict mortality. From expectations data from the 1992 Health and Retirement Study (HRS), I construct subjective, cohort life tables that are shown to predict the unusual direction of revisions to U.S. life expectancy by gender between 1992 and 2004: that is, for these cohorts, the Social Security Actuary (SSA) raised male life expectancy in 2004 and at the same lowered female life expectancy, narrowing the gender gap in longevity by 25% over this period. Further, although the subjective life expectancies for men appear to be roughly in line with the 2004 life tables, the subjective expectations of women suggest that female life expectancies estimated by the SSA might still be on the high side.
KeywordsSurvival Probability Life Table Survivor Function Subjective Expectation Female Life Expectancy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bell, F., A. Wade, and S. Goss. 1992. “Life Tables for the United States Social Security Area 1900-2080.” Actuarial Study No. 107, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, Office of the Actuary.Google Scholar
- Bernheim, B.D. 1989. “The Timing of Retirement: A Comparison of Expectations and Realizations.” Pp. 335–55 in The Economics of Aging, edited by D. Wise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- — 1990. “How do the Elderly Form Expectations: An Analysis of Responses to New Information.” Pp. 259–83 in Issues in the Economics of Aging, edited by D. Wise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Cutler, D. and E. Meara. 2004. “Changes in the Age Distribution of Mortality Over the Twentieth Century.” Pp. 333–65 in Perspectives on the Economics of Aging, edited by D. Wise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Gan, L., M. Hurd, and D. McFadden. 2003. “Individual Subjective Survival Curves.” NBER Working Paper 9480. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Lawless, J.F. 1982. Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Leveille, S.G., B.W.J.H. Penninx, D. Melzer, G. Izmirlian, and J.M. Guralnik, 2000. “Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Mobility Disability in Old Age: The Dynamics of Incidence, Recovery, and Mortality.” Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 55B(1):S41-S50.Google Scholar
- National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). 2004. “Health, United States, 2004.” Hyattsville, MD: NCHS. Available online at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htmGoogle Scholar
- Olshansky, S.J. and B.A. Carnes. 2001. The Quest for Immortality: Science at the Frontiers of Aging. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
- Pollard, A.H., F. Yusuf, and G.N. Pollard. 1990. Demographic Techniques. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Vaupel, J., A. Baudisch, M. Dolling, D. Roach, and J. Gampe. 2004.“The Case for Negative Senescence.” MPIDR Working Paper 2004-02. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.Google Scholar
- Vaupel, J. and H. Lundstrom. 1994. “Longer Life Expectancy? Evidence From Sweden of Reductions in Mortality Rates at Advanced Ages.” Pp. 79–94 in Studies in the Economics of Aging, edited by D. Wise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar