Demography

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 821–828

“Having it all” no longer: Fertility, Female Labor supply, and the new life choices of Generation x

  • James P. Vere
Article

Abstract

This study uses data from the U.S. Current Population Surveys and Natality Detail Files to examine cohort-level changes in fertility and female labor supply. Although only at the start of their careers, college-educated women from more-recent cohorts are having more children and supplying less market labor than their counterparts born toward the end of the baby boom. Pronounced differences across cohorts suggest that recent increases in fertility and declines in female labor supply have structural underpinnings and may continue for some time.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Autor, D.H., L.F. Katz, and M.S. Kearney. 2005. “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Re-Assessing the Revisionists.” Working Paper No. 11627. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Bradbury, K. and J. Katz. 2005. “Women’s Rise: A Work in Progress.” Regional Review 14(3):58–67.Google Scholar
  3. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2007. March Current Population Surveys, 1993-2006. Electronic data les and documentation. Available online at http://dataferrett.census.govGoogle Scholar
  4. Crittenden, A. 2001. The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World Is Still the Least Valued. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  5. Crowley, M. 2003. “Generation X Speaks Out on Civic Engagement and the Decennial Census: An Ethnographic Approach.” Technical report. Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Goldin, C. 1997. “Career and Family: College Women Look to the Past.” Pp. 20–58 in Gender and Family Issues in the Workplace, edited by F.D. Blau and R.G. Ehrenberg. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Hamilton, B.E., J.A. Martin, S.J. Ventura, P.D. Sutton, and F. Menacker. 2005. “Births: Preliminary Data for 2004.” National Vital Statistics Reports 54(8):1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Hotchkiss, J.L. 2006. “Changes in Behavioral and Characteristic Determination of Female Labor Force Participation, 1975–2005.” Economic Review 91(2):1–20.Google Scholar
  9. National Bureau of Economic Research. Mare-Winship March Current Population Survey Uniform Extracts, 1968–1992. Electronic data les and documentation. Available online at http:www.nber. org/data/mare_winship.htmlGoogle Scholar
  10. National Center for Health Statistics. 2007. Natality Detail Files, 1968–2002. Public-use data les and documentation. Available online at http://www.nber.org/data/vital-statistics-natality-data.htmlGoogle Scholar
  11. Trunk, P. 2005. “New Generation Puts the Focus on Family.” The Boston Globe, April 17, p. G1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • James P. Vere
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economics and FinanceUniversity of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations