Demography

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 659–672

The influence of parents’ marital quality on adult children’s attitudes toward marriage and its alternatives: Main and moderating effects

  • Mick Cunningham
  • Arland Thornton
Article

Abstract

Drawing on a panel study of parents and children, we investigate linkages between parents’ marital quality and adult children’s attitudes toward a range of family issues, including premarital sex, cohabitation, lifelong singlehood, and divorce. We hypothesize that parents’ marital quality will be negatively related to children’s support for these behaviors in adulthood and that parents’ marital quality will condition the intergenerational transmission of attitudes toward these issues. We find some evidence that parents’ marital quality influences children’s support for divorce and premarital sex. More important, our analyses show that parents’ marital quality facilitates the intergenerational transmission of attitudes. Parents’ attitudes toward premarital sex, cohabitation, and being single are more strongly linked to those same attitudes among their young adult children when parents’ marital quality is high than when it is low.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken, L.S. and S.G. West. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, P.R. and A. Booth. 1991a. “The Consequences of Divorce for Attitudes Toward Divorce and Gender Roles.” Journal of Family Issues 12:306–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. — 1991b. “Consequences of Parental Divorce and Marital Unhappiness for Adult Well-being.” Social Forces 69:895–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. — 1995. “Changes in Gender Role Attitudes and Perceived Marital Quality.” American Sociological Review 60:58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amato, P.R. and S.J. Rogers. 1997. “A Longitudinal Study of Marital Problems and Subsequent Divorce.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 59:612–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axinn, W.G. and A. Thornton. 1992. “The Relationship Between Cohabitation and Divorce: Selectivity or Causal Influence.” Demography 29:357–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. — 1993. “Mothers, Children, and Cohabitation: The Intergenerational Effects of Attitudes and Behavior.” American Sociological Review 58:233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — 1996. “The Influence of Parents’ Marital Dissolutions on Children’s Attitudes Toward Family Formation.” Demography 33:66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. — 2000. “The Transformation in the Meaning of Marriage.” Pp. 147–65 in Ties that Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, edited by L. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, and A. Thornton. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Bumpass, L. 2002. “Family-Related Attitudes, Couple Relationships and Union Stability.” Pp. 161–83 in Meaning and Choice: Value Orientations and Life Course Decisions, edited by R. Lesthhaeghe. The Hague: NIDI/CBGS.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, E.Q. 1969. “Adolescent Socialization.” Pp. 821–59 in Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, edited by D.A. Goslin. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  12. Cherlin, A.J. 2004. “The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66:848–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gecas, V. and M.A. Seff. 1990. “Families and Adolescents: A Review of the 1980s.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 47:905–12.Google Scholar
  14. Gillis, J.R. 1985. For Better, for Worse: British Marriages, 1600 to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Glass, J., V.L. Bengtson, and C.C. Dunham. 1986. “Attitude Similarity in Three-Generation Families: Socialization, Status Inheritance, or Reciprocal Influence?” American Sociological Review 51:685–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanawalt, B.A. 1986. The Ties That Bound: Peasant Families in Medieval England. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kapinus, C.A. 2004. “The Effect of Parents’ Attitudes Toward Divorce on Offspring’s Attitudes: Gender and Parental Divorce as Mediating Factors.” Journal of Family Issues 25:112–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laslett, P. 1984/1965. The World We Have Lost: England Before the Industrial Age, 3rd ed. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  19. Macfarlane, A. 1986. Marriage and Love in England: Modes of Reproduction, 1300–1840. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Moen, P., M.A. Erickson, and D. Dempster-McClain. 1995. “Their Mothers’ Daughters? The Intergenerational Transmission of Gender Attitudes in a World of Changing Roles.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 59:281–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore, K.A., J.L. Peterson, and F.F. Furstenburg. 1986. “Parental Attitudes and Early Sexual Activity.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 48:777–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peterson, G.W. and B.C. Rollins. 1987. “Parent-Child Socialization.” Pp. 471–507 in Handbook of Marriage and the Family, edited by M.B. Sussman and S.K. Steinmetz. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  23. Rogers, S.J. and P.R. Amato. 1997. “Is Marital Quality Declining? The Evidence From Two Generations.” Social Forces 75:1089–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. — 2000. “Have Changes in Gender Relations Affected Marital Quality?” Social Forces 79:731–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thornton, A., W.G. Axinn, and Y. Xie. Forthcoming. Marriage and Cohabitation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Thornton, A. and L. Young-DeMarco. 2001. “Four Decades of Trends in Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States: The 1960s Through the 1990s.” Journal of Marriage and Family 63:1009–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Umberson, D., K. Williams, D.A. Powers, M.D. Chen, and A.M. Campbell. 2005. “As Good as It Gets? A Life Course Perspective on Marital Quality.” Social Forces 84:493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. VanLaningham, J., D.R. Johnson, and P.R. Amato. 2001. “Marital Happiness, Marital Duration, and the U-Shaped Curve: Evidence From a Five-Wave Panel Study.” Social Forces 78:1313–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Waite, L. 1995. “Does Marriage Matter?” Demography 32:483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waite, L. and M. Gallagher. 2000. The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  31. Weinstein, M. and A. Thornton. 1989. “Mother-Child Relations and Adolescent Sexual Attitudes and Behavior.” Demography 26:563–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wickrama K.A.S., F.O. Lorenz, R.D. Conger, and G.H. Elder. 1997. “Marital Quality and Physical Illness: A Latent Growth Curve Analysis.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 59:143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mick Cunningham
    • 1
  • Arland Thornton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyWestern Washington UniversityBellingham
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, Population Studies Center, Survey Research CenterUniversity of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations