Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 127–140 | Cite as

Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages?

  • Catherine T. Kenney
  • Sara S. McLanahan
Article

Abstract

In response to increases in cohabitation in the United States, researchers have recently focused on differences between cohabiting and marital unions. One consistent finding is a higher rate of domestic violence among cohabiting couples as compared with married couples. A prominent explanation for this finding is that cohabitation is governed by a different set of institutionalized controls than marriage. This article explores an alternative explanation, namely, that differences in selection out of cohabitation and marriage, including selection of the least-violent cohabiting couples into marriage and the most-violent married couples into divorce, lead to higher observed rates of violence among cohabiting couples in cross-sectional samples. Our results suggest that researchers should be cautious when making comparisons between married and cohabiting couples in which the dependent variable of interest is related to selection into and out of relationship status.

Keywords

Partner Violence Female Partner Family Violence Married Couple Differential Selection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, K.L. 1997. “Gender, Status, and Domestic Violence: An Integration of Feminist and Family Violence Approaches.” Journal of Marriage and Family 59:655–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brines, J. and K. Joyner. 1999. “The Ties That Bind: Principles of Cohesion in Cohabitation and Marriage.” American Sociological Review 64:333–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownridge, D.A. and S.S. Halli. 2002. “Understanding Male Partner Violence Against Cohabiting and Married Women: An Empirical Investigation With a Synthesized Model.” Journal of Family Violence 17:341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brush, L. 1993. “Violent Acts and Injurious Outcomes in Married Couples: Methodological Issues in the NSFH.” Gender and Society 4(1):56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bumpass, L. and H. Lu. 2000. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts in the United States.” Population Studies 54(1):29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bumpass, L.L. and J.A. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 26: 615–25. orasper, L. and L. Sayer. 2000. “Cohabitation Transitions: Different Attitudes and Purposes, Different Paths.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, March 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cunradi, C., R. Caetano, and J. Schafer. 2002. “Socioeconomic Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence Among White, Black, and Hispanic Couples in the United States.” Journal of Family Violence 17:377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeMaris, A. 2000. “Till Discord Do Us Part: The Role of Physical and Verbal Conflict in Union Disruption.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:683–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. — 2001. “The Influence of Intimate Violence on Transitions Out of Cohabitation.” Journal of Marriage and Family 63:235–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis, D. 1989. “Male Abuse of a Married or Cohabiting Female Partner: The Application of Sociological Theory to Research Findings.” Violence and Victims 4:235–55.Google Scholar
  11. Ellison, C.G., J.P. Bartkowski, and K.L. Anderson. 1999. “Are There Religious Variations in Domestic Violence?” Journal of Family Issues 20(1):87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gelles, R. 1983. “Toward a Theory of Intra-Familial Violence: An Exchange/Social Control Theory.” Pp. 151–65 in The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, edited by D. Finkelhor, R. Gelles, G. Hotaling, and M.A. Straus. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Glenn, N. 1990. “Quantitative Research on Marital Quality in the 1980s: A Critical Review.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 52:818–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heaton, T.B. 1991. “Time-Related Determinants of Marital Dissolution.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kantor, G. and J. Jasinski. 1998. “Dynamics and Risk Factors in Partner Violence.” Pp. 1–43 in Partner Violence: A Comprehensive Review of 20 Years of Research, edited by J.L. Jasinski and L.M. Williams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Lundberg, S. and R. Pollak. 2001. “Bargaining and Distribution in Families.” Pp. 314–40 in The Wellbeing of Children and Families: Research and Data Needs, edited by A. Thornton. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lupri, E., E. Grandin, and M. Brinkerhoff. 1994. “Socioeconomic Status and Male Violence in the Canadian Home: A Reexamination.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 19:47–73.Google Scholar
  18. Manning, W. and P. Smock. 2002. “First Comes Cohabitation and Then Comes Marriage?” Journal of Family Issues 23:1065–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McNally, J., S. Sassler, and R. Schoen. 1997. “Misplaced Affection: The Use of Multiple Imputation to Reconstruct Missing Cohabiting Partner Information in the NSFH.” PSTC Working Paper #97-09. Population Studies and Training Center, Brown University, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
  20. Nock, S. 1995. “A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting Relationships.” Journal of Family Issues 16(1):53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raley, R.K. 1996. “A Shortage of Marriageable Men? A Note on the Role of Cohabitation in Black-White Differences in Marriage Rates.” American Sociological Review 61:973–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Repetti, R. 2001. “Searching for the Roots of Marital Conflict in Uxoricides and Uxorious Husbands.” Pp. 47–55 in Couples in Conflict, edited by A. Booth, A.C. Crouter, and M. Clements. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Rindfuss, R. and A. VandenHeuvel. 1990. “Cohabitation: A Precursor to Marriage or an Alternative to Being Single?” Population and Development Review 16:703–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodriquez, E., K. Lasch, P. Chandra, and J. Lee. 2001. “Family Violence, Employment Status, Welfare Benefits, and Alcohol Drinking in the United States: What Is the Relation?” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 55:172–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogge, R. and T. Bradbury. 1999. “Till Violence Does Us Part: The Differing Roles of Communication and Aggression in Predicting Adverse Marital Outcomes.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67:340–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanchez, L., W. Manning, and P. Smock. 1998. “Sex-Specialized or Collaborative Mate Selection? Union Transitions Among Cohabitors.” Social Science Research 27:280–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seltzer, J. 2000. “Families Formed Outside of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:1247–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smock, P. 2000. “Cohabitation in the United States: An Appraisal of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smock, P. and W. Manning. 1997. “Cohabiting Partners’ Economic Circumstances and Marriage.” Demography 34:331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sorenson, S., D. Upchurch, and H. Shen. 1996. “Violence and Injury in Marital Arguments: Risk Patterns and Gender Differences.” American Journal of Public Health 86:35–40.Google Scholar
  31. Stets, J. 1991. “Cohabiting and Marital Aggression: The Role of Social Isolation.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:669–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stets, J. and M. Straus. 1989. “The Marriage License as a Hitting License: A Comparison of Assaults in Dating, Cohabiting, and Married Couples.” Journal of Family Violence 4:161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sweet, J., L. Bumpass, and C. Vaughn. 1988. “The Design and Content of the National Survey of Families and Households.” Working Paper #1. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  34. Szinovacz, M. 1983. “Using Couple Data as a Methodological Tool: The Case of Marital Violence.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 45:633–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Umberson, D., K. Anderson, J. Glick, and A. Shapiro. 1998. “Domestic Violence, Personal Control, and Gender.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 60:442–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson, M. and M. Daly. 2001. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Couple Conflict in Registered Versus De Facto Marital Unions.” Pp. 3–26 in Couples in Conflict, edited by A. Booth, A.C. Crouter, and M. Clements. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, M., M. Daly, and C. Wright. 1993. “Uxoricide in Canada: Demographic Risk Patterns.” Canadian Journal of Criminology 35:263–91.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, M., H. Johnson, and M. Daly. 1995. “Lethal and Nonlethal Violence Against Wives.” Canadian Journal of Criminology 37:331–61.Google Scholar
  39. Yamaguchi, K. and D. Kandel. 1985. “Dynamic Relationships Between Premarital Cohabitation and Illicit Drug Use: An Event-History Analysis of Role Selection and Role Socialization.” American Sociological Review 50:530–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yllo, K. and M. Straus. 1981. “Interpersonal Violence Among Married and Cohabiting Couples.” Family Relations 30:339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine T. Kenney
    • 1
  • Sara S. McLanahan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Program in Gender and Women’s StudiesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International AffairsPrinceton UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations