, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 769–790 | Cite as

Do conditional cash transfers influence migration? A study using experimental data from the Mexican progresa program

  • Guy Stecklov
  • Paul Winters
  • Marco Stampini
  • Benjamin Davis


Prior research on Mexican migration has shown that social networks and economic incentives play an important role in determining migration outcomes. We use experimental data from PROGRESA, Mexico’s primary poverty-reduction program, to evaluate the effects of conditional cash transfers on migration both domestically and to the United States. Our study complements a growing body of literature aimed at overcoming longstanding hurdles to the establishment of causal validity in empirical studies of migration. Analysis based on the data collected before and after the program’s onset shows that conditional transfers reduce U.S. migration but not domestic migration. The data also enable us to explore the role of existing family and community migration networks. The results show that migration networks strongly influence migration, but that the effect of conditional transfers on migration is apparently not mediated by existing migration network structures. Our results suggest that conditional transfers may be helpful in managing rural out-migration, particularly to the United States.


Cash Transfer Migration Decision Network Variable Family Network Neoclassical Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adato, M., D. Cody, and M. Ruel. 2000. “An Operations Evaluation of PROGRESA From the Perspective of Bene ciaries, Promotoras, School Directors, and Health Staff.” Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Angelucci, M. 2004. “Aid and Migration: An Analysis of the Impact of PROGRESA on the Timing and Size of Labour Migration.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1187. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  3. Behrman, J. and P.E. Todd. 1999. “Randomness in the Experimental Samples of PROGRESA Education, Health, and Nutrition Program).” Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, M. 1989. “Family and Personal Networks in International Migration—Recent Developments and New Agendas.” International Migration Review 23:638–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiswick, B.R. 1978. “The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-born Men.” Journal of Political Economy 86:897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, B., G. Stecklov, and P. Winters. 2002. “Domestic and International Migration From Rural Mexico: Disaggregating the Effects of Network Structure and Composition.” Population Studies 56:291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, B. and P. Winters. 2001. “Gender, Networks, and Mexico-U.S. Migration.” The Journal of Development Studies 38(2):1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deaton, A. 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diaz-Briquets, S. 1991. “The Effects of International Migration on Latin America.” Pp. 183–200 in The Unsettled Relationship: Labor Migration and Economic Development, edited by D.G. Papa-demetriou and P. Martin. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  10. Donato, K.M., J. Durand, and D.S. Massey. 1992. “Stemming the Tide—Assessing the Deterrent Effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act.” Demography 29:139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Espinosa, K. and D.S. Massey. 1999. “Undocumented Migration and the Quantity and Quality of Social Capital.” Pp. 106–37 in Migration and Transnational Social Spaces, edited by P. Ludger. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Faini, R. and A. Venturini. 1993. “Trade, Aid, and Migrations—Some Basic Policy Issues.” European Economic Review 37(2–3):435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faini, R. 1994. “Migration and Growth: The Experience of Southern Europe.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 964. Center for Economic Policy Research, London. Fox, V. 2002. “Informe de Gobierno.” Available online at Scholar
  14. Garza, G. 1999. “Global Economy, Metropolitan Dynamics, and Urban Policies in Mexico.” Cities 16(3):149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gertler, P.J. 2004. “Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Child Health? Evidence From PROGRESA’s Control Randomized Experiment.” Health, Health Care and Economic Development 94:336–41.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, J.R. and M.P. Todaro. 1970. “Migration, Unemployment, and Development—2-Sector Analysis.” American Economic Review 60(1):126–42.Google Scholar
  18. Heckman, J., R. Lalonde, and J. Smith. 1999. “Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs.” Pp. 1865–2097 in Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by A. Ashenfelter and D. Card. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  19. Kandel, W. and D.S. Massey. 2002. “The Culture of Mexican Migration: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Social Forces 80:981–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kearney, M. 1986. “From the Invisible Hand to Visible Feet—Anthropological Studies of Migration and Development.” Annual Review of Anthropology 15:331–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindstrom, D.P. 1996. “Economic Opportunity in Mexico and Return Migration From the United States.” Demography 33:357–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massey, D.S. 1987. “Do Undocumented Migrants Earn Lower Wages Than Legal Immigrants—New Evidence From Mexico.” International Migration Review 21:236–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Massey, D.S., J. Arango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, and J.E. Taylor. 1993. “Theories of International Migration—A Review and Appraisal.” Population and Development Review 19:431–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. —. 1994. “An Evaluation of International Migration Theory: The North American Case.” Population and Development Review 20:699–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Massey, D.S. and K.E. Espinosa. 1997. “What’s Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 102:939–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Massey, D.S. and F. Garcia España. 1987. “The Social Process of International Migration.” Science 237(4816):733–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Massey, D.S., L. Goldring, and J. Durand. 1994. “Continuities in Transnational Migration—An Analysis of 19 Mexican Communities.” American Journal of Sociology 99:1492–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer, B.D. 1995. “Natural and Quasi-experiments in Economics.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13(2):151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mueser, P.R. 1989. “Measuring the Impact of Locational Characteristics on Migration: Interpreting Cross-Sectional Analyses.” Demography 26:499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Munshi, K. 2003. “Networks in the Modern Economy: Mexican Migrants in the U.S. Labor Market.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:549–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neumann, K. and D.S. Massey. 1994. “Undocumented Migration and the Quantity and Quality of Social Capital.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of American, Miami, May 5–7.Google Scholar
  32. Palloni, A., D.S. Massey, M. Ceballos, K. Espinosa, and M. Spittel. 2001. “Social Capital and International Migration: A Test Using Information on Family Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 106:1262–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parker, S. and E. Skouas. 2000. The Impact of PROGRESA on Work, Leisure, and Time Allocation. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenzweig, M.R. and O. Stark. 1989. “Consumption Smoothing, Migration, and Marriage—Evidence From Rural India.” Journal of Political Economy 97:905–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sadoulet, E., A. De Janvry, and B. Davis. 2001. “Cash Transfer Programs With Income Multipliers: PROCAMPO in Mexico.” World Development 29:1043–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sjaastad, L.A. 1962. “The Costs and Returns of Human Migration.” Journal of Political Economy 70:80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skouas, E. 2001. “PROGRESA and Its Impacts on the Human Capital and Welfare of Households in Rural Mexico: A Synthesis of the Results of an Evaluation by IFPRI.” Research report. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. Skouas, E., B. Davis, and S. De La Vega. 2001. “Targeting the Poor in Mexico: An Evaluation of the Selection of Households Into PROGRESA.” World Development 29:1769–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skouas, E. and B. McClafferty. 2001. “Is PROGRESA Working? Summary of the Results of an Evaluation by IFPRI.” FCND Discussion Paper. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, J.P. and D. Thomas. 2003. “Remembrances of Things Past: Test-Retest Reliability of Retrospective Migration Histories.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in 0ociety) 166(1):23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stark, O. 1991. The Migration of Labor. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Stark, O. and D.E. Bloom. 1985. “The New Economics of Labor Migration.” American Economic Review 75:173–78.Google Scholar
  43. Stark, O. and D. Levhari. 1982. “On Migration and Risk in LDCs.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 31(1):191–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stark, O. and J.E. Taylor. 1989. “Relative Deprivation and International Migration.” Demography 26:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. STATA. 2003. “STATA User’s Guide Release 8.” College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, J.E. 1986. “Differential Migration, Networks, Information, and Risk.” Pp. 147–71 in Migration, Human Capital and Development, edited by O. Stark. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  47. Todaro, M.P. 1969. “Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries.” American Economic Review 59(1):138–48.Google Scholar
  48. Winters, P., A. de Janvry, and E. Sadoulet. 2001. “Family and Community Networks in Mexico-U.S. Migration.” Journal of Human Resources 36(1):159–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wooldridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy Stecklov
    • 1
  • Paul Winters
    • 2
  • Marco Stampini
    • 3
  • Benjamin Davis
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyHebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsAmerican UnivsersityUSA
  3. 3.School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
  4. 4.Food and Agriculture OrganizationRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations