, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 791–812 | Cite as

Temporal and spatial variation in age-specific net migration in the United States

  • Kenneth M. Johnson
  • Paul R. Voss
  • Roger B. Hammer
  • Glenn V. Fuguitt
  • Scott Mcniven


As fertility differences in the United States diminish, population redistribution trends are increasingly dependent on migration. This research used newly developed county-level age-specific net migration estimates for the 1990s, supplemented with longitudinal age-specific migration data spanning the prior 40 years, to ascertain whether there are clear longitudinal trends in age-specific net migration and to determine if there is spatial clustering in the migration patterns. The analysis confirmed the continuation into the 1990s of distinct net migration “signature patterns” for most types of counties, although there was temporal variation in the overall volume of migration across the five decades. A spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed large, geographically contiguous regions of net in-migration (in particular, Florida and the Southwest) and geographically contiguous regions of net out-migration (the Great Plains, in particular) that persisted over time. Yet the patterns of spatial concentration and fragmentation over time in these migration data demonstrate the relevance of this “neighborhood” approach to understanding spatiotemporal change in migration.


Spatial Autocorrelation Census Bureau Spatial Cluster Nonmetropolitan Area Nonmetropolitan County 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  2. —. 1995. “Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA.” Geographical Analysis 27:93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. 1996. “The Moran Scatterplot as an ESDA Tool to Assess Local Instability in Spatial Association.” Pp. 111–25 in Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS, edited by M. Fischer, H.J. Scholten, and D. Unwin. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  4. Baller, R.D., L. Anselin, S.F. Messner, G. Deane, and D.F. Hawkins. 2001. “Structural Covariates of U.S. County Homicide Rates: Incorporating Spatial Effects.” Criminology 39:561–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baller, R.D., S.F. Messner, L. Anselin, and G. Deane. 2002. “The Interchangeability of Homicide Data Sources: A Spatial Analytical Perspective.” Homicide Studies 6:211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beale, C.L. and K.M. Johnson. 1998. “The Identi cation of Recreational Counties in Nonmetropolitan Areas of the United States.” Population Research and Policy Review 17:37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bender, L.D., B.L. Green, T.F. Hady, J.A. Kuehn, M.K. Nelson, L.B. Perkinson, and P.J. Ross. 1985. “The Diverse Social and Economic Structure of Nonmetropolitan America.” Rural Development Research Report 49. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Bowles, G.K., C.L. Beale, and E.S. Lee. 1975. Net Migration of the Population 1960–70, by Age, Sex and Color. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Athens, GA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  9. Bowles, G.K. and J.D. Tarver. 1965. Net Migration of the Population 1950–60 by Age Sex and Color. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, D.L., G.V. Fuguitt, T.B. Heaton, and S. Waseem. 1997. “Continuities in Size of Place Preferences in the United States, 1972–1992.” Rural Sociology 62:408–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Champion, A.G. 1992. “Urban and Regional Demographic Trends in the Developed World.” Urban Studies 29:461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cliff. A.D. and J.K. Ord. 1981. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  13. Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Dubin, R.A. 1988. “Estimation of Regression Coefficients in the Presence of Spatially Autocorrelated Error Terms.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70:466–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Entwisle, B., R.R. Rindfuss, D.K. Guilkey, A. Chamratrithirong, S.R. Curran, and Y. Sawangdee. 1996. “Community and Contraceptive Choice in Rural Thailand.” Demography 33:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Entwisle, B., R.R. Rindfuss, S.J. Walsh, T.P. Evans, and S.R. Curran. 1997. “Geographic Information Systems, Spatial Network Analysis, and Contraceptive Choice.” Demography 34:171–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fingleton, B. 1999. “Estimates of Time to Economic Convergence: An Analysis of Regions of the European Union.” International Regional Science Review 22:5–35.Google Scholar
  18. Florax, R.J.G.M. and H. Folmer. 1992. “Specification and Estimation of Spatial Linear Regression Models.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 22:405–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fotheringham, A.S., C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. 2000. Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Frey, W.H. 1987. “Migration and Depopulation of the Metropolis: Regional Restructuring or Rural Renaissance?” American Sociological Review 52:240–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 2000. “The New Urban Demographics: Race Space and Boomer Aging.” The Brookings Review 18(3):18–21. Available on-line at Scholar
  22. Frey, W.H. and K.M. Johnson. 1998. “Concentrated In-migration, Restructuring and the Selective Deconcentration’ of the United States Population.” Pp 79–106 in Migration Into Rural Areas, edited by P. Boyle and K. Halfacree. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Fuguitt, G.V. and C.L. Beale. 1993. “The Changing Concentration of the Older Nonmetropolitan Population, 1960-90.” Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 48:S278–88.Google Scholar
  24. Fuguitt, G.V. and T.B. Heaton. 1995. “The Impact of Migration on the Nonmetropolitan Population Age Structure, 1960–1990.” Population Research and Policy Review 14:215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodchild, M. 1987. “A Spatial Analytical Perspective on Geographic Information Systems.” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1:327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haining, R. 1990. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, K.M. 1985. The Impact of Population Change on Business Activity in Rural America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. —. 1989. “Recent Population Redistribution Trends in Nonmetropolitan America.” Rural Sociology 54:301–26.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, K.M. and G.V. Fuguitt. 2000. “Continuity and Change in Rural Migration Patterns, 1950–1995.” Rural Sociology 65:27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Land, K.C., G. Deane, and J.R. Blau. 1991. “Religious Pluralism and Church Membership: A Spatial Diffusion Model.” American Sociological Review 56:237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LeSage, J.P. 1999. The Theory and Practice of Spatial Econometrics. Toledo, OH: Department of Economics, University of Toledo.Google Scholar
  32. Long, L. and A. Nucci. 1997. “The Clean Break Revisited: Is U.S. Population Again Deconcentrating?” Environment and Planning A 29:1355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. —. 1998. “Accounting for Population Turnarounds in Nonmetropolitan America.” Research in Rural Sociology and Development 7:47–70.Google Scholar
  34. Messner, S.F. and L. Anselin. 2004. “Spatial Analysis of Homicide With Areal Data.” Pp. 127–44 in Spatially Integrated Social Science, edited by M.F. Goodchild and D.G. Janelle. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Messner, S.F., L. Anselin, R.D. Baller, D.F. Hawkins, G. Deane, and S.E. Tolnay. 1999. “The Spatial Patterning of County Homicide Rates: An Application of Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15:423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mueser, P.R., M.J. White, and J.P. Tierney. 1988. “Patterns of Net Migration by Age for U.S. Counties 1950–1980: The Impact of Increasing Spatial Differentiation by Life Cycle.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science 11:57–76.Google Scholar
  37. Passel, J. and J.G. Robinson. 1985. “Net Census Undercount by Age, Race and Sex Estimated by Demographic Analysis.” Unpublished tabulations. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. Plane, D.A. and F. Heins. 2003. “Age Articulation of U.S. Inter-metropolitan Migration Flows.” Annals of Regional Science 37:107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plane, D.A. and G.F. Mulligan. 1996. “Measuring Spatial Focusing in a Migration System.” Demography 34:251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plane, D.A. and P.A. Rogerson. 1991. “The Ten Commandments of Migration Research.” Pp. 15–41 in Regional Science: Retrospect and Prospect, edited by D.E. Boyce, P. Nijkamp, and D. Shefer. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Rindfuss, R.R. and P.C. Stern. 1998. “Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science: The Need and the Challenges.” Pp. 1–27 in People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science, edited by D. Liverman, E.F. Moran, R.R. Rindfuss, and P.C. Stern. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson, J. G., Bashir A., P.D. Gupta, and K. A. Woodrow. 1993. “Estimating Coverage of the 1990 United States Census: Demographic Analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88:1061–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogers, A. and S. Sweeney. 1998. “Measuring the Spatial Focus of Migration Patterns.” Professional Geographer 50:232–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sampson, R.J., J.D. Morenoff, and F. Earls. 1999. “Beyond Social Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Ef cacy for Children.” American Sociological Review 64:633–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomlinson, R. 1962. “The Determination of a Base Population for Computing Migration Rates.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 11:356–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tita, G. and J. Cohen. 2004. “Measuring Spatial Diffusion of Shots Fired Activity Across City Neighborhoods.” Pp. 171–204 in Spatially Integrated Social Science, edited by M.F. Goodchild and D.G. Janelle. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tolnay, S.E. 1995. “The Spatial Diffusion of Fertility: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Counties in the American South.” American Sociological Review 60:299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tolnay, S.E., E.M. Beck, and J.L. Massey. 1989. “Black Lynchings: The Power Threat Hypothesis Revisited.” Social Forces 67:605–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tolnay, S.E., G. Deane, and E.M. Beck. 1996. “Vicarious Violence: Spatial Effects on Southern Lynchings, 1890–1919.” American Journal of Sociology 102:788–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. U.S. Census Bureau. 1992a. 1990 Census of Population and Housing: Modi ed Age/Race, Sex and Hispanic Origin (MARS) State and County File [machine-readable data le]. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  51. U.S. Census Bureau. 1992b. “1990 Census of Population and Housing Public Law 94–171 Data (Adjusted), Age by Race and Hispanic Origin.” Available on-line at Scholar
  52. —. 2001. “ESCAP II: Demographic Analysis Results. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report No. 1, October 13, 2001.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  53. —. 2002a. Census 2000 Modified Race Data [MR(31)-CO.txt]. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  54. —. 2002b. “Summary of Estimated Net Coverage. DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series PP-54. December 31, 2002.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  55. Voss, P.R., S. McNiven, R.B. Hammer, K.M. Johnson, and G.V. Fuguitt. 2004. “County-Specific Net Migration by Five-Year Age Groups, Hispanic Origin, Race and Sex 1990-2000.” Working Paper 2004–24. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  56. Walters, W.H. 2002. “Later-Life Migration in the United States: A Review of Recent Literature.” Journal of Planning Literature 17(1):37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wardwell, J.M. 1981. “Equilibrium and Change in Nonmetropolitan Growth.” Rural Sociology 42:156–79.Google Scholar
  58. Wardwell, J.M. and C.J. Gilchrist. 1987. “Nonmetropolitan Migration Facts of the 1980s Theories of the 1970s.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Madison, WI, August. Weeks, J.R. 2004. “The Role of Spatial Analysis in Demographic Research.” Pp. 381–99 in Spatially Integrated Social Science, edited by M.F. Goodchild and D.G. Janelle. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Weeks, J.R., M.S. Gadalla, T. Rashed, J. Stanforth, and A.G. Hill. 2000. “Spatial Variability in Fertility in Menou a, Egypt, Assessed Through the Application of Remote Sensing and GIS Technologies.” Environment and Planning A 32:695–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. White, M.J., P. Mueser, and J.P. Tierney. 1987. Net Migration of the Population of the United States 1970–1980, by Age, Race and Sex: United States, Regions, Divisions, States and Counties [machine-readable data file]. File available from the Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  61. Zelinsky, W. 1971. “The Hypothesis of the Mobility Transition.” Geographical Review 61:219–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth M. Johnson
    • 1
  • Paul R. Voss
    • 2
  • Roger B. Hammer
    • 2
  • Glenn V. Fuguitt
    • 2
  • Scott Mcniven
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyLoyola University-ChicagoChicago
  2. 2.Department of Rural SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations