Demography

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 51–73 | Cite as

Fifteen years later: Can residential mobility programs provide a long-term escape from neighborhood segregation, crime, and poverty

  • Micere Keels
  • Greg J. Duncan
  • Stefanie Deluca
  • Ruby Mendenhall
  • James Rosenbaum

Abstract

We examined whether the Gautreaux residential mobility program, which moved poor black volunteer families who were living in inner-city Chicago into more-affluent and integrated neighborhoods, produced long-run improvements in the neighborhood environments of the participants. We found that although all the participants moved in the 6 to 22 years since their initial placements, they continued to reside in neighborhoods with income levels that matched those of their placement neighborhoods. Families who were placed in higher-income, mostly white neighborhoods were currently living in the most-affluent neighborhoods. Families who were placed in lower-crime and suburban locations were most likely to reside in low-crime neighborhoods years later.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alba, R.D. and J.R. Logan. 1993. “Minority Proximity to Whites in Suburbs: An Individual-Level Analysis of Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1388–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boisjoly, J., G.J. Duncan, and S.L. Hofferth. 1995. “Access to Social Capital.” Journal of Family Issues 16:609–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, W.A.V. 1992. “Residential Preferences and Residential Choices in a Multiethnic Context.” Demography 29:451–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crane, J. 1991. “The Epidemic Theory of Ghettos and Neighborhood Effects on Dropping Out and Teenage Childbearing.” American Journal of Sociology 96:1226–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeLuca, S. and J.E. Rosenbaum. 2003. “If Low-Income Blacks Are Given a Chance to Live in White Neighborhoods, Will They Stay? Examining Mobility Patterns in a Quasi-Experimental Program With Administrative Data.” Housing Policy Debate 14:305–46.Google Scholar
  6. Dielman, F.M. 2001. “Modeling Residential Mobility: A Review of Recent Trends in Research.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16:249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellen, I.G. and M.A. Turner. 1998. “Does Neighborhood Matter? Assessing Recent Evidence.” Housing Policy Debate 8:833–66.Google Scholar
  8. Ellwood, D. 1986. “Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Are There Teen Jobs Missing in the Ghetto?” Pp. 147–87 in Black Youth Employment Crisis, edited by R.B. Freeman and H. Holzer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gramlich, E., D. Laren, and N. Sealand. 1992. “Moving Into and Out of Poor Urban Areas.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11:273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holzer, H. 1991. “Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown?” Urban Studies 28:105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jencks, C. and S.E. Mayer. 1990. “The Social Consequences of Growing Up in a Poor Neighborhood.” Pp. 111–86 in Inner City Poverty in the United States, edited by L.E. Lynn, Jr., and M.G. McGeary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kan, K. 1999. “Expected and Unexpected Residential Mobility.” Journal of Urban Economics 45:72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keels, M. 2003. “Residential Mobility Programs: Potential Processes to a Permanent Escape From Neighborhood Segregation, Crime, and Poverty.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 16-19, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  14. Kling, J. and J. Liebman. 2005. “Bullets Don’t Got No Name: Consequences of Fear in the Ghetto.” Pp. 243–81 in Discovering Successful Pathways in Children’s Development: New Methods in the Study of Childhood and Family Life, edited by T.S. Weisner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Logan, J.R., R.D. Alba, T. McNulty, and B. Fisher. 1996. “Making a Place in the Metropolis: Locational Attainment in Cities and Suburbs.” Demography 33:443–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Massey, D.S. and N.A. Denton. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Massey, D.S. and G. Lundy. 2001. “Use of Black English and Racial Discrimination in Urban Housing Markets: New Methods and Findings.” Urban Affairs Review 36:452–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendenhall, R., G.J. Duncan, and S. DeLuca. 2004. “Neighborhood Resources and Economic Mobility: Results From the Gautreaux Program.” Unpublished manuscript. Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  19. Orr, L., J.D. Feins, R. Jacob, E. Beecroft, L. Sanbonmatsu, L.F. Katz, J.B. Liebman, and J.R. Kling. 2003. Moving to Opportunity Interim Impacts Evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.Google Scholar
  20. Patterson, O. 1997. The Ordeal of Integration: Progress and Resentment in America’s “Racial” Crisis. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  21. Peterson, G.E. and K. Williams. 1995. “Housing Mobility: What Has It Accomplished and What Is Its Promise?” Pp. 7–96 in Housing Mobility: Promise or Illusion?, edited by A. Polikoff. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Popkin, S.J. and M.K. Cunningham. 2001. CHA Relocation Counseling Assessment Interim Report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Popkin, S., B. Katz, M. Cunningham, M. Brown, J. Gustafson, and M. Turner. 2004. A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Popkin, S., J. Rosenbaum, and P. Meaden. 1993. “Labor Market Experiences of Low-Income Black Women in Middle-Class Suburbs: Evidence From a Survey of Gautreaux Program Participants.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12:556–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenbaum, E. 1996. “Racial/Ethnic Differences in Home Ownership and Housing Quality.” Social Problems 43:403–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenbaum, J.E. 1994. “Housing Mobility Strategies for Changing the Geography of Opportunity.” Working Paper. Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenbaum, J.E., S.J. Popkin, J.E. Kaufman, and J. Rusin. 1991. “Social Integration of Low-Income Black Adults in Middle-Class White Suburbs.” Social Problems 38:448–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rubinowitz, L.S. and J.E. Rosenbaum. 2000. Crossing the Class and Color Lines: From Public Housing to White Suburbia. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Rusin-White, J. 1993. “Self-efficacy, Residential Integration and Attainment in Gautreaux Families: A Longitudinal Study.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Human Development and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  30. South, S.J. and K.D. Crowder. 1997. “Escaping Distressed Neighborhoods: Individual, Community, and Metropolitan Influences.” American Journal of Sociology 102:1040–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stack, C. 1974. All Our Kin: Survival Strategies. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  32. Thernstrom, S. and A. Thernstrom. 1997. America in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, M.A. 1997. “The Impact of Spatial Mismatch on Female Labor Force Participation.” Economic Development Quarterly 11:138–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turner, M.A., S. Popkin, and M. Cunningham. 1999. Section 8 Mobility and Neighborhood Health: Emerging Issues and Neighborhood Health. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Varaday, D.P. and C.C. Walker. 1998. “Case Studies of Vouchered-Out Properties.” Final Report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  36. —. 2000. “Vouchering Out Distressed Subsidized Developments: Does Moving Lead to Improvements in Housing and Neighborhood Conditions?” Housing Policy Debate 11:115–62.Google Scholar
  37. Wacquant, L.J.D. and W.J. Wilson. 1989. “Poverty, Joblessness, and the Social Transformation of the Inner City.” Pp. 70–102 in Welfare Policy for the 1990s, edited by P.H. Cottingham and D.T. Ellwood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Micere Keels
    • 1
  • Greg J. Duncan
    • 1
  • Stefanie Deluca
    • 2
  • Ruby Mendenhall
    • 3
  • James Rosenbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Development and Social Policy programNorthwestern UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyJohns Hopkins UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Harris Graduate School of Public Policy StudiesUniversity of ChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Institute for Policy ResearchNorthwestern UniversityEvanston

Personalised recommendations