Demography

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 721–738 | Cite as

Coming to stay: An analysis of the U.S. Census question on immigrants’ year of arrival

  • Ilana Redstone
  • Douglas S. Massey
Article

Abstract

Using the New Immigrant Survey Pilot, we compare answers to the census question on year of arrival in the United States with answers to questions about the dates and durations of earlier U.S. trips. We show that the year identified by the census does not correspond to the year of either the first or the last U.S. trip. Because many immigrants enter and leave the United States several times before becoming legal immigrants, the census question produces estimates of U.S. experience that are quite different from those produced by direct questions about trip durations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alba, R. and V. Nee. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Gordon, M.M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gould, J.D. 1980. “European Inter-Continental Immigration. The Road Home: Return Migration From the USA.” Journal of European Economic History 9:41–112.Google Scholar
  4. Handlin, O. 1951. The Uprooted. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.Google Scholar
  5. Hatton, T.J. and J.G. Williamson. 1994. “International Migration 1850–1939: An Economic Survey.” Pp. 3–32 in Migration and the International Labor Market: 1850–1939, edited by T.J. Hatton and J.G. Williamson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1998. The Age of Mass Migration: Causes and Economic Impact. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Jasso, G., D.S. Massey, M.R. Rosenzweig, and J.P. Smith. 1999. “The New Immigrant Survey Pilot Study: Overview and New Findings About U.S. Legal Immigrants at Admission.” Demography 37:127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Massey, D.S., R. Alarcón, J. Durand, and H. González. 1987. Return to Aztlan: The Social Process of International Migration From Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Massey, D.S. and K. Bartley. Forthcoming. “The Changing Legal Status Distribution of Immigrants: A Caution.” International Migration Review.Google Scholar
  10. Massey, D.S. and N.J. Malone. 2003. “Pathways to Legalization.” Population Research and Policy Review 21:473–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Portes, A. and R.G. Rumbaut. 1990. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. —. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Poston, D.L., D. Alvarez, and M. Tienda. 1976. “Earnings Differences Between Anglo and Mexican American Male Workers in 1960 and 1970: Changes in the ‘Cost’ of Being Mexican American.” Social Science Quarterly 57:617–31.Google Scholar
  14. Reichert, J.S. and D.S. Massey. 1979. “Patterns of Migration From a Central Mexican Town to the United States: A Comparison of Legal and Illegal Migrants.” International Migration Review 13:599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sudman, S. and N.M. Bradburn. 1982. Asking Questions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Sudman, S., N.M. Bradburn, and N. Schwartz. 1996. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 2001. 2000 Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  18. Warren, R. and E.P. Kraly. 1985. The Elusive Exodus: Emigration from the United States. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilana Redstone
    • 1
  • Douglas S. Massey
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate Group in DemographyUniversity of Pennsylvania
  2. 2.Office of Population ResearchPrinceton UniversityPrinceton

Personalised recommendations