, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 629–648 | Cite as

Family structure, intergenerational mobility, and the reproduction of poverty: Evidence for increasing polarization?

  • Kelly Musick
  • Robert D. Mare


A substantial body of research has demonstrated links between poverty and family structure from one generation to the next, but has left open key questions about the implications of these associations for aggregate-level change. To what extent does intergenerational inheritance affect trends in poverty and single parenthood over time and, in particular, trends in the relative economic positions of single-parent and two-parent families? This article examines how patterns of intergenerational inheritance play out in the population over the long run, using data from the National Longitudinal Surveys and a model of population renewal that takes into account intergenerational mobility and differential fertility across groups that are defined by poverty status and family structure. Our results suggest that current rates of intergenerational inheritance have little effect on population change over time. They account for only a small share of the recent historical change in poverty and family structure and play no role in exacerbating existing economic disparities by family structure.


Family Structure Poverty Rate Current Popu Lation Survey Poverty Status National Longitudinal Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astone, N.M. and S.S. McLanahan. 1991. “Family Structure, Parental Practices and High School Completion.” American Sociological Review 56:309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axinn, W.G. and A. Thornton. 2000. “The Transformation in the Meaning of Marriage.” Pp. 147–65 in The Ties That Bind: Perspective on Marriage and Cohabitation, edited by L.J. Waite, C.A. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, and A. Thornton. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G.S. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biblarz, T.J. and A.E. Raftery. 1993. “The Effects of Family Disruption on Social Mobility.” American Sociological Review 58:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bumpass, L. and H.H. Lu. 2000. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts in the United States.” Population Studies 54(1):29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bumpass, L.L. 1990. “What’s Happening to the Family? Interactions Between Demographic and Institutional Change.” Demography 27:483–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corcoran, M. 2001. “Mobility, Persistence, and the Consequences of Poverty for Children: Child and Adult Outcomes.” Pp. 127–61 in Understanding Poverty, edited by S.H. Danziger and R.H. Haveman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, G.J. and W. Rodgers. 1991. “Has Children’s Poverty Become More Persistent?” American Sociological Review 56:538–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eggebeen, D.J. and D.T. Lichter. 1991. “Race, Family Structure, and Changing Poverty Among American Children.” American Sociological Review 56:801–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellwood, D.T. and C. Jencks. 2002. “The Growing Differences in Family Structure: What Do We Know? Where Do We Look for Answers?” Paper presented at the IRP Summer Research Workshop: Current Research on the Low-Income Population, June 24–27, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  12. Garfinkel, I., J. Hoem, S. McLanahan, and D. Meyer. 1991. “Does a Growing Underclass Threaten to Undermine the Progress of Black Americans?” Discussion Paper No. 957-91, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  13. Iceland, J. 2003. “Why Poverty Remains High: The Role of Income Growth, Economic Inequality, and Changes in Family Structure, 1949–1999.” Demography 40:499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lam, D. 1986. “The Dynamics of Population Growth, Differential Fertility, and Inequality.” American Economic Review 76:1103–16.Google Scholar
  15. Levine, D.I. and B. Mazumder. 2002. Choosing the Right Parents: Changes in the Intergenerational Transmission of Inequality Between 1980 and the Early 1990s. Working Paper Series WP-02-08. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Mare, R.D. 1996. “Demography and the Evolution of Educational Inequality.” Pp. 117–51 in Social Differentiation and Social Inequality: Essays in Honor of John Pock, edited by J.N. Baron, D.B. Grusky, and D.J. Treiman. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1997. “Differential Fertility, Intergenerational Educational Mobility, and Racial Inequality.” Social Science Research 26:263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayer, S.E. 1997. What Money Can’t Buy: Family Income and Children’s Life Chances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mazumder, B. 2001. The Mis-measurement of Permanent Earnings: New Evidence From Social Security Earnings Data. Working Paper Series WP-01-24. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. McLanahan, S.S. 1985. “Family Structure and the Reproduction of Poverty.” American Journal of Sociology 90:873–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 1988. “Family Structure and Dependency: Early Transitions to Female Household Headship.” Demography 25:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLanahan, S. and L. Bumpass. 1988. “Intergenerational Consequences of Family Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 94:130–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLanahan, S.S. and G.D. Sandefur. 1994. Growing Up With a Single Parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Musick, K. 2000. Nonmarital Childbearing and the Changing American Family. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  25. Musick, K. and R.D. Mare. 2004. Recent Trends in the Inheritance of Poverty and Family Structure. CCPR Working Paper No. 002-04. California Center for Population Research, University of California-Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  26. Oppenheimer, V.K., M. Kalmijn, and N. Lim. 1997. “Men’s Career Development and Marriage Timing During a Period of Rising Inequality.” Demography 34:311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Preston, S.H. 1974. “Differential Fertility, Unwanted Fertility, and Racial Trends in Occupational Achievement.” American Sociological Review 39:492–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Preston, S.H. and C. Campbell. 1993. “Differential Fertility and the Distribution of Traits: The Case of IQ.” American Journal of Sociology 98:997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raley, R.K. and L. Bumpass. 2003. “The Topography of the Divorce Plateau: Levels and Trends in Union Stability in the United States After 1980.” Demographic Research Vol. 8, Article 8. Rogers, A. 1975. Introduction to Multiregional Mathematical Demography. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  30. Ruggles, S. 1997. “The Rise of Divorce and Separation in the United States, 1880–1990.” Demography 34:455–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandefur, G.D., S. McLanahan, R.A. Wojtkiewicz. 1992. “The Effects of Parental Marital Status During Adolescence on High School Graduation.” Social Forces 71:103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Solon, G. 1992. “Intergenerational Income Mobility in the United States.” American Economic Review 82:393–408.Google Scholar
  33. Stevens, A.H. 1994. “The Dynamics of Poverty Spells: Updating Bane and Ellwood.” American Economic Review 84(2):34–37.Google Scholar
  34. Sweeney, M.M. 2002. “Two Decades of Family Change: The Shifting Economic Foundations of Marriage.” American Sociological Review 67:132–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thornton, A. 1989. “Changing Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:873–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2002. NLS Handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Census Bureau. 1998. Trap Door? Revolving Door? Or Both? Current Population Reports, Series P-70, No. 63. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  38. —. 2000. Fertility of American Women. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 526. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  39. U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. “Poverty Thresholds in 2000.” Available on-line at poverty/threshld/thresh00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  40. U.S. Census Bureau. 2003a. “Table CH-1. Living Arrangements of Children Under 18: 1960 to Present.” Available on-line at Scholar
  41. U.S. Census Bureau. 2003b. “Table H1. Percent Childless and Births Per 1,000 Women in the Last Year: Selected Years, 1976 to Present.” Available on-line at fertility/tabH1.pdfGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wojtkiewicz, R.A. 1993. “Simplicity and Complexity in the Effects of Parental Structure on High School Graduation.” Demography 30:701–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, L.L. 1996. “Effects of Family Instability, Income, and Income Instability on the Risk of a Premarital Birth.” American Sociological Review 61:386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu, L.L., L. Bumpass, and K. Musick. 2001. “Historical and Life Course Trajectories of Nonmarital Childbearing.” Pp. 3–48 in Out of Wedlock: Causes and Consequences of Nonmarital Fertility, edited by L.L. Wu and B. Wolfe. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. Wu, L.L. and S.P. Martin. 2002. “Is There an Engine of Nonmarital Fertility?” Unpublished manuscript, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  47. Wu, L.L. and B.C. Martinson. 1993. “Family Structure and the Risk of a Premarital Birth.” American Sociological Review 58:210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimmerman, D.J. 1992. “Regression Toward Mediocrity in Economic Stature.” American Economic Review 82:409–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly Musick
    • 1
  • Robert D. Mare
    • 2
  1. 1.Kelly Musick, Department of Sociology, KAP 352University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations