, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 671–696 | Cite as

Family structure and children’s educational outcomes: Blended families, stylized facts, and descriptive regressions

  • Donna K. Ginther
  • Robert A. Pollak


This article adds to the growing literature describing correlations between children’s educational outcomes and family structure. Popular discussions have focused on the distinction between two-parent families and single-parent families. This article shows that educational outcomes for both types of children in blended families—stepchildren and their half-siblings who are the joint children of both parents—are similar to each other and substantially worse than outcomes for children reared in traditional nuclear families. We conclude that as a description of the data, the crucial distinction is between children reared in traditional nuclear families (i.e., families in which all children are the joint children of both parents) and children reared in other family structures (e.g., single-parent families or blended families). We then turn from “stylized facts” (i.e., simple correlations) that control only for family structure to “descriptive regressions” that control for other variables such as family income. When controls for other variables are introduced, the relationship between family structure and children’s educational outcomes weakens substantially and is often statistically insignificant.


Family Structure Educational Outcome Stylize Fact Biological Parent Schooling Outcome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, G.S. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Biblarz, T.J. and G. Gottainer. 2000. “Family Structure and Children’s Success: A Comparison of Widowed and Divorced Single-Mother Families.” Journal of Marriage and Family 62:533–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biblarz, T.J. and A.E. Raftery. 1999. “Family Structure, Educational Attainment, and Socioeconomic Success: Rethinking the ‘Pathology of Matriarchy.’” American Journal of Sociology 105:321–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Björklund, A. and M. Sundström. 2002. “Parental Separation and Children’s Educational Attainment: A Siblings Approach.” Discussion Paper No. 643. IZA, Bonn, Germany. Available online at http://www.iza.orgGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, D.M. 1999. “The Effect of Income on Child Development.” Review of Economics and Statistics 81:261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boggess, S. 1998. “Family Structure, Economic Status, and Educational Attainment.” Journal of Population Economics 11:205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowker, G. C. and S.L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Case, A., I. Lin, and S. McLanahan. 2001. “Educational Attainment of Siblings in Stepfamilies.” Evolution and Human Behavior 22:269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherlin, A.J. 1978. “Remarriage as an Incomplete Institution.” American Journal of Sociology 84:634–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherlin, A.J. and F.F. Furstenberg, Jr. 1994. “Stepfamilies in the United States: A Reconsideration.” Annual Review of Sociology 20:359–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherlin, A.J., F.F. Furstenberg, Jr., P.L. Chase-Lansdale, K.E. Kiernan, P.K. Robins, D.R. Morrison, and J.O. Teitler. 1991. “Longitudinal Studies of Effects of Divorce on Children in Great Britain and the United States.” Science 252:1386–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corak, M. 2001. “Death and Divorce: The Long-Term Consequences of Parental Loss on Adolescents.” Journal of Labor Economics 19:682–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daly, M. and M.I. Wilson. 1999. The Truth About Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. —. 2000. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Marriage and Divorce.” Pp. 91–110 in Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, edited by L. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, and A. Thornton. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Duncan, G.J. and J. Brooks-Gunn, eds. 1996. Consequences of Growing Up Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Eckstein, Z. and K.I. Wolpin. 1999. “Why Youths Drop Out of High School: The Impact of Preferences, Opportunities, and Abilities.” Econometrica 67:1295–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ermisch, J.F. and M. Francesconi. 2001. “Family Structure and Children’s Achievements.” Journal of Population Economics 14:249–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evenhouse, E. and S. Reilly. 2004. “A Sibling Study of Stepchild Well-being.” Journal of Human Resources 39:248–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fields, J. 2001. “Living Arrangements of Children: Fall 1996.” Current Population Reports, Series P70, No. 74. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  20. Gennetian, L. Forthcoming. “One or Two Parents? Half or Step Siblings? The Effect of Family Composition on Young Children’s Achievement.” Journal of Population Economics.Google Scholar
  21. Gruber, J. Forthcoming. “Is Making Divorce Easier Bad for Children? The Long Run Implications of Unilateral Divorce.” Journal of Labor Economics.Google Scholar
  22. Haveman, R. and B. Wolfe. 1994. Succeeding Generations: On the Effects of Investments in Children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. —. 1995. “The Determinants of Children’s Attainments: A Review of Methods and Findings.” Journal of Economic Literature 33:1829–78.Google Scholar
  24. Lang, K. and J.L. Zagorsky. 2001. “Does Growing Up With a Parent Absent Really Hurt?” Journal of Human Resources 36:253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manski, C., G.D. Sandefur, S. McLanahan, and D. Powers. 1992. “Alternative Estimates of the Effect of Family Structure During Adolescence on High School Graduation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayer, S.E. 1997. What Money Can’t Buy: Family Income and Children’s Life Chances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. McLanahan, S. and G. Sandefur. 1994. Growing Up With a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Moynihan, D.P. 1965. The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. Washington, DC: Office of Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  29. Painter, G. and D.I. Levine. 2000. “Family Structure and Youths’ Outcomes: Which Correlations Are Causal?” Journal of Human Resources 35:524–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomson, E., T.L. Hanson, and S.S. McLanahan. 1994. “Family Structure and Child Well-being: Economic Resources vs. Parental Behaviors.” Social Forces 73:221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weiss, Y. and R.J. Willis. 1985. “Children as Collective Goods in Divorce Settlements.” Journal of Labor Economics 3:268–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. —. 1993. “Transfers Among Divorced Couples: Evidence and Interpretation.” Journal of Labor Economics 11:629–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wojtkiewicz, R.A. 1993. “Simplicity and Complexity in the Effects of Parental Structure on High School Graduation.” Demography 30:701–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wolfe, B., R. Haveman, D. Ginther, and C.B. An. 1996. “The ‘Window Problem’ in Studies of Children’s Attainments: A Methodological Exploration.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91:970–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu, L.L. and B.C. Martinson. 1993. “Family Structure and the Risk of a Premarital Birth.” American Sociological Review 58:210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donna K. Ginther
    • 1
  • Robert A. Pollak
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KansasLawrence
  2. 2.Olin School of BusinessWashington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations