Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 285–301 | Cite as

Self-care: Why do parents leave their children unsupervised?

  • Lynne M. Casper
  • Kristin E. Smith
Article

Abstract

We used a preferences-and-constraints model to develop four hypotheses to explain why parents may choose self-care (an unsupervised arrangement) as the primary child care arrangement for their children over supervised alternatives and tested them in a multivariate framework using 1995 data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation. We found that the choice of self-care over supervised care alternatives is linked to the availability of parents’ time to care for children, the child’s level of responsibility and maturity, and the neighborhood context. However, we found no evidence that parents’ ability to pay for child care is related to the choice of self-care. The results also suggest that parents use different decision-making processes, depending on their children’s ages.

Keywords

Child Care Neighborhood Context Married Parent Child Care Cost Child Care Arrangement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G.S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bianchi, S.M. and L.M. Casper. 2000. “American Families.” Population Bulletin 55(4). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, D.M. 1991. “The Quality of Child Care: An Economic Perspective.” Pp. 145–73 in The Economics of Child Care, edited by D.M. Blau. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, D.M. and P.K. Robins. 1988. “Child Care Demand and Labor Supply of Young Mothers Over Time.” Demography 28:333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cain, V. and S. Hofferth. 1989. “Parental Choice of Self-care for School-age Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casper, L.M. and S.M. Bianchi. 2002. Continuity and Change in the American Family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Casper, L.M., M. Hawkins, and M. O’Connell. 1994. “Who’s Minding the Kids? Child Care Arrangements: Fall 1991.” Current Population Reports, Series P-70-36. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  9. Casper, L.M. and M. O’Connell. 1998. “Work, Income, the Economy, and Married Fathers as Child-Care Providers.” Demography 35:243–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casper, L.M. and K.E. Smith. 2002. “Dispelling the Myths: Self-Care, Class, and Race.” Journal of Family Issues 23:717–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, J.S. 1990. Foundations in Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Connelly, R. 1992. “The Effects of Child Care Costs on Married Women’s Labor Force Participation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eccles, J.S. and B.L. Barber. 1999. “Student Council, Volunteering, Basketball, or Marching Band? What Kind of Extracurricular Involvement Matters?” Journal of Adolescent Research 14: 10–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folk, K. and Y. Yi. 1994. “Piecing Together Child Care With Multiple Arrangements: Crazy Quilt or Preferred Pattern for Employed Parents of Preschool Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 56:669–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofferth, S., A. Brayfield, S. Deich, and P. Holcomb. 1991. National Child Care Survey, 1990. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hofferth, S. and D. Wissoker. 1992. “Price, Quality, and Income in Child Care Choice.” Journal of Human Resources 27:71–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lovko, A. and D.G. Ullman. 1989. “Research on the Adjustment of Latchkey Children: Role of Background/Demographic and Latchkey Situation Variables.” Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 18:16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahoney, J.L. and R.B. Cairns. 1997. “Do Extracurricular Activities Protect Against Early School Dropout?” Developmental Psychology 33:241–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marsh, H.W. 1992. “Extracurricular Activities: Beneficial Extension of the Traditional Curriculum or Subversion of Academic Goals?” Journal of Educational Psychology 84:553–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McHale, S.M., A.C. Crouter, and C.J. Tucker. 2001. “Free-Time Activities in Middle Childhood: Links With Adjustment in Early Adolescence.” Child Development 72:1764–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mott, J.A., P.A. Crowe, J. Richardson, and B. Flay. 1999. “After-School Supervision and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: Contributions of the Setting and Intensity of After-School Self-Care.” Journal of Behavioral Medicine 22:35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mulhall, P.F., D. Stone, and B. Stone. 1996. “Home Alone: Is It a Risk Factor for Middle School Youth and Drug Use?” Journal of Drug Education 26:39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Osgood, D.W., J.K. Wilson, P.M. O’Malley, J.G. Bachman, and L.D. Johnston. 1996. “Routine Activities and Individual Deviant Behavior.” American Sociological Review 61:635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peterson, L. and P. Magrab. 1989. “Introduction to the Special Section: Children on Their Own.” Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 18:2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Posner, J.K. and D.L. Vandell. 1999. “After School Activities and the Development of Low Income Children: A Longitudinal Study.” Developmental Psychology 35:868–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Presser, H. 1989. “Can We Make Time for Children? The Economy, Work Schedules, and Child Care.” Demography 26:523–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riley, L.A. and J.L. Glass. 2002. “You Can’t Always Get What You Want—Infant Care Preferences and Use Among Employed Mothers.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 64:2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, K.E. 2000. “Who’s Minding the Kids? Child Care Arrangements: Fall 1997.” Current Population Reports, Series P-70, No. 70. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  29. — 2002. “Who’s Minding the Kids? Child Care Arrangements: Fall 1995.” Current Population Reports, Series P-70, No. 86. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  30. Steinberg, L. 1986. “Latchkey Children and Susceptibility to Peer Pressure: An Ecological Analysis.” Developmental Psychology 22:433–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. U.S. Census Bureau. 1998. Survey of Income and Program Participation Quality Profile, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  32. Van Dijk, L. and J.J. Siegers. 1996. “The Division of Child Care Among Mothers, Fathers, and Nonparental Care Providers in Dutch Two-Parent Families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:1018–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vandivere, S., K. Tout, M. Zaslow, J. Calkins, and J. Capizzano. 2003. “Unsupervised Time: Family and Child Factors Associated With Self-Care.” Occasional Paper No. 71. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynne M. Casper
    • 1
  • Kristin E. Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)USA
  2. 2.Population DivisionU.S. Census BureauUSA

Personalised recommendations