Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 213–236 | Cite as

The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce

  • Marianne P. Bitler
  • Jonah B. Gelbach
  • Hilary W. Hoynes
  • Madeline Zavodny
Article

Abstract

The goal of the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act was to end needy parents’ dependence on governmental benefits, in part by promoting marriage. The prereform welfare system was widely believed to discourage marriage because it provided benefits primarily to single mothers. However, welfare reform may have actually decreased the incentives to be married by giving women greater financial independence via the program’s new emphasis on work. This article uses vital statistics data on marriages and divorces during 1989–2000 to examine the role of welfare reform (state waivers and implementation of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) and other state-level variables on flows into and out of marriage. The results indicate that welfare reform has led to fewer new divorces and fewer new marriages, although the latter result is sensitive to specification and the choice of data.

Keywords

Current Population Survey Divorce Rate Welfare Reform Marriage Rate Vital Statistic Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G.S. 1973. “A Theory of Marriage: Part I.” Journal of Political Economy 81: 813–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S., E.M. Landes, and R.T. Michael. 1977. “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability.” Journal of Political Economy 85:1141–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, N.G., D.E. Bloom, and P.H. Craig. 1989. “The Divergence of Black and White Marriage Patterns.” American Journal of Sociology 95:692–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bitler, M.P., J.B. Gelbach, and H.W. Hoynes. 2002. “The Impact of Welfare Reform on Living Arrangements.” NBER Working Paper No. 8784, February. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  5. — 2003. “Some Evidence on Race, Welfare Reform, and Household Income.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 93:293–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blank, R.M. 2001. “Declining Caseloads/Increased Work: What Can We Conclude About the Effects of Welfare Reform?” Economic Policy Review [Federal Reserve Bank of New York] 7(2):25–36.Google Scholar
  7. — 2002. “Evaluating Welfare Reform in the U.S.” Journal of Economic Literature 40: 1105–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blank, R.M. and L. Schmidt. 2001. “Work, Wages and Welfare.” Pp. 70–96 in The New World of Welfare, edited by R.M. Blank and R. Haskins. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  9. Blau, F.D., L.M. Kahn, and J. Waldfogel. 2000. “Understanding Young Women’s Marriage Decisions: The Role of Labor and Marriage Market Conditions.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53:624–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brien, M.J. 1997. “Racial Differences in Marriage and the Role of Marriage Markets.” Journal of Human Resources 32:741–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brien, M.J., L.A. Lillard, and L.J. Waite. 1999. “Interrelated Family-Building Behaviors: Cohabitation, Marriage, and Nonmarital Conception.” Demography 36:535–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarkberg, M., R.M. Stolzenberg, and L.J. Waite. 1995. “Attitudes, Values, and Entrance Into Cohabitational Versus Marital Unions.” Social Forces 74:609–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corcoran, M., S.K. Danziger, A. Kahil, and K.S. Seefeldt. 2000. “How Welfare Reform Is Affecting Women’s Work.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:241–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan, G.J. and P.L. Chase-Lansdale. 2001. “Work, Wages and Welfare.” Pp. 391–420 in The New World of Welfare, edited by R.M. Blank and R. Haskins. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  15. Ellwood, D.T. 2000. “The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Social Policy Reforms on Work, Marriage, and Living Arrangements.” National Tax Journal 53:1063–105.Google Scholar
  16. Ellwood, D.T. and M.J. Bane. 1985. “The Impact of AFDC on Family Structure and Living Arrangements.” Pp. 137–207 in Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 7, edited by R.G. Ehrenberg. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ellwood, D.T. and C. Jencks. 2001. “The Growing Differences in Family Structure: What Do We Know? Where Do We Look for Answers?” Unpublished manuscript, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Fitzgerald, J.M. and D.C. Ribar. 2004. “Welfare Reform and Female Headship.” Demography 41:189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraker, T.M., C.M. Ross, R.A. Stapulonis, R.B. Olsen, M.D. Kovac, M.R. Dion, and A. Rangarajan. 2002. The Evaluation of Welfare Reform in Iowa. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Available on-line at http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/PDFs/Iowawelreport.pdfGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldscheider, F.K. and L.J. Waite. 1986. “Sex Differences in the Entry Into Marriage.” American Journal of Sociology 92:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldstein, J.R. 1999. “The Leveling of Divorce in the United States.” Demography 36: 409–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grogger, J. and S.G. Bronars. 2001. “The Effect of Welfare Payments on the Marriage and Fertility Behavior of Initially Unwed Mothers: Results From a Twins Experiment.” Journal of Political Economy 109:529–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grogger, J., L.A. Karoly, and J.A. Klerman. 2002. “Consequences of Welfare Reform: A Research Synthesis.” DRU-2676-DHHS. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Available on-line at http:// www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/welfare_reform/rand_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
  24. Harknett, K. and L.A. Gennetian. 2003. “How an Earnings Supplement Can Affect Union Formation Among Low-Income Single Mothers.” Demography 40:451–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffman, S.D. and G.J. Duncan. 1995. “The Effect of Incomes, Wages, and AFDC Benefits on Marital Disruption.” Journal of Human Resources 30:19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horn, W.F. and I.V. Sawhill. 2001. “Fathers, Marriage, and Welfare Reform.” Pp. 421–41 in The New World of Welfare, edited by R.M. Blank and R. Haskins. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  27. Hoynes, H.W. 1997. “Does Welfare Play Any Role in Female Headship Decisions?” Journal of Public Economics 65:89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaestner, R. and N. Kaushal. Forthcoming. “Immigrant and Native Responses to Welfare Reform.” Journal of Population Economics.Google Scholar
  29. Klerman, J.A. and S.J. Haider. Forthcoming. “A Stock-Flow Analysis of the Welfare Caseload.” Journal of Human Resources.Google Scholar
  30. Kreider, R.M. and J.M. Fields. 2002. “Number, Timing, and Duration of Marriages and Divorces: 1996.” Current Population Reports, Series P-70, No. 80, February.Google Scholar
  31. Lichter, D.T., D.R. Graefe, and J.B. Brown. 2003. “Is Marriage a Panacea? Union Formation Among Economically Disadvantaged Unwed Mothers.” Social Problems 50:60–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lichter, D.T., D.K. McLaughlin, and D.C. Ribar. 2002. “Economic Restructuring and the Retreat From Marriage.” Social Science Research 31:230–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loprest, P. 2001. “How Are Families that Left Welfare Doing? A Comparison of Early and Recent Welfare Leavers.” Research report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Available on-line at http: //www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=310282Google Scholar
  34. Manning, W.D. and P.J. Smock. 1995. “Why Marry? Race and the Transition to Marriage Among Cohabitors.” Demography 32:509–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Michalopoulos, C., D. Card, L.A. Gennetian, K. Harknett, and P.K. Robins. 2000. The Self Sufficiency Project at 36 Months: Effects of a Financial Work Incentive on Employment and Income. Ottawa: Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.Google Scholar
  36. Moffitt, R. 1990. “The Effect of the U.S. Welfare System on Marital Status.” Journal of Public Economics 41:101–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. — 1994. “Welfare Effects on Female Headship With Area Effects.” Journal of Human Resources 29:621–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. — 1998. “The Effect of Welfare on Marriage and Fertility.” Pp. 50–97 in Welfare, the Family, and Reproductive Behavior, edited by R. Moffitt. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  39. — 2001. “Welfare Benefits and Female Headship in U.S. Time Series.” Pp. 143–72 in Out of Wedlock: Causes and Consequences of Nonmarital Fertility, edited by L.L. Wu and B. Wolfe. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. — 2002a. “Economic Effects of Means-Tested Transfers in the U.S.” NBER Working Paper No. 8730, January. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  41. — 2002b. “The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program.” NBER Working Paper No. 8749, February. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  42. Murray, C. 2001. “Family Formation.” Pp. 137–68 in The New World of Welfare, edited by R.M. Blank and R. Haskins. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  43. Oppenheimer, V.K. 1997. “Women’s Employment and the Gain to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ressler, R.A. and M.S. Waters. 2000. “Female Earnings and the Divorce Rate: A Simultaneous Equations Model.” Applied Economics 32:1889–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenbaum, D.T. 2000. “Taxes, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and Marital Status.” Joint Center for Poverty Research Working Paper No. 177, May. Evanston, IL, and Chicago: Joint Center for Poverty Research. Available on-line at http://www.jcpr.org/wpfiles/RosenbaumSG2000final.pdfGoogle Scholar
  46. Schoeni, R.F. and R.M. Blank. 2000. “What Has Welfare Reform Accomplished? Impacts on Welfare Participation, Employment, Income, Poverty, and Family Structure.” NBER Working Paper No. 7627, March. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  47. — 2003. “Changes in the Distribution of Children’s Family Income Over the 1990s.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 93:304–308. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schultz, T.P. 1994. “Marital Status and Fertility in the United States: Welfare and Labor Market Effects.” Journal of Human Resources 29:637–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thorton, A. and W.L. Rodgers. 1987. “The Influence of Individual and Historical Time on Marital Dissolution.” Demography 24:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tzeng, J.M. and R.D. Mare. 1995. “Labor Market and Socioeconomic Effects on Marital Stability.” Social Science Research 24:329–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Services Policy. 1998. Aid to Families With Dependent Children: The Baseline. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available on-line at http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/AFDC/baselineGoogle Scholar
  52. Winkler, A.E. 1995. “Does AFDC-UP Encourage Two-Parent Families?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14:4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood, R.G. 1995. “Marriage Rates and Marriageable Men: A Test of the Wilson Hypothesis.” Journal of Human Resources 31:163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marianne P. Bitler
    • 1
  • Jonah B. Gelbach
    • 2
  • Hilary W. Hoynes
    • 5
    • 3
  • Madeline Zavodny
    • 4
  1. 1.RAND Corporation and IZAUSA
  2. 2.University of MarylandUSA
  3. 3.National Bureau of Economic ResearchUSA
  4. 4.Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaDavis

Personalised recommendations