, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 61–86 | Cite as

Poverty and macroeconomic performance across space, race, and family structure

  • Craig Gundersen
  • James P. Ziliak


We examined the effects of macroeconomic performance and social policy on the extent and depth of poverty in America using state-level panel data from the 1981–2000 waves of the Current Population Survey. We found that a strong macroeconomy at both the state and national levels reduced both the number of families who were living in poverty and the severity of poverty. The magnitude and source of these antipoverty effects, however, were not uniform across family structures and racial groups or necessarily over time. While gains in the eradication of poverty, in general, were tempered by rising wage inequality, simulations indicated that female-headed families and families that were headed by black persons experienced substantial reductions in poverty in the 1990s largely because of the growth in median wages. An auxiliary time-series analysis suggests that the expansions in the federal Earned Income Tax Credit of the 1990s accounted for upward of 50% of the reduction in after-tax income deprivation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaron, H. 1967. “The Foundations of the War on Poverty Reexamined.” American Economic Review 57:1229–40.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, L. 1964. “Trickling Down: The Relationship Between Economic Growth and the Extent of Poverty Among American Families.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 78:511–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A. 1987. “On the Measurement of Poverty.” Econometrica 55:749–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartik, T. 1991. Who Benefits From State and Local Development Policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  5. Bitler, M., J. Gelbach, and H. Hoynes. 2003. “Some Evidence on Race, Welfare Reform, and Household Income.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 93(2):293–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard, O. and L. Katz. 1992. “Regional Evolutions.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blank, R. 1993. “Why Were Poverty Rates So High in the 1980s?” Pp. 21–55 in Poverty and Prosperity in the USA in the Late Twentieth Century, edited by D. Papadimitriou and E. Wolff. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  8. —. 2001. “What Causes Public Assistance Caseloads to Grow?” Journal of Human Resources 36:85–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blank, R. and A. Blinder. 1986. “Macroeconomics, Income Distribution, and Poverty.” Pp. 180–208 in Fighting Poverty, edited by S. Danziger and D. Weinberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blank, R. and D. Card. 1993. “Poverty, Income Distribution, and Growth: Are They Still Connected?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:285–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bound, J. and H. Holzer. 1993. “Industrial Shifts, Skill Levels, and the Labor Market for White and Blank Males.” Review of Economics and Statistics 75:387–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cain, G. 1998. “The State of the Economy and the Problem of Poverty: Implications for the Success or Failure of Welfare Reform.” Discussion Paper 1183-98. Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  13. Card, D. and A. Krueger. 1995. Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, K. and L. Summers. 1979. “Demographic Differences in Cyclical Employment Variation.” Journal of Human Resources 16:61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowell, F. 2000. “Measurement of Inequality.” Pp. 87–166 in Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 1, edited by A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  16. Cutler, D. and L. Katz. 1991. “Macroeconomic Performance and the Disadvantaged.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dalaker, J. and B. Proctor. 2000. Poverty in the United States: 1999. Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 210. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  18. Dickert-Conlin, S. and S. Houser. 2002. “The EITC and Marriage.” National Tax Journal 55:25–40.Google Scholar
  19. Edin, K. and L. Lein. 1997. Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Eissa, N. and H. Hoynes. 1999. “The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Labor Supply of Married Couples.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California-Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. Eissa, N. and J. Liebman. 1996. “Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit.” Quarterly Journal of Economics May:605-37.Google Scholar
  22. Foster, J., J. Greer, and E. Thorbecke. 1984. “A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures.” Econometrica 52:761–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freeman, R. 2001. “‘The Rising Tide Lifts’….?” Pp. 97–126 in Understanding Poverty, edited by S. Danziger and R. Haveman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goldin, C. and R. Margo. 1992. “The Great Compression: The Wage Structure in the United States at Mid-Century.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottschalk, P. and S. Danziger. 1985. “A Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Economic Growth and Transfers on Poverty.” American Economic Review 75:153–61.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, R., M. Feldstein, J. Frankel, R. Gordon, N.G. Mankiw, and V. Zarnowitz. 2003. “The NBER’s Business-Cycle Dating Procedure.” Cambridge, MA: Business Cycle Dating Committee, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  27. Haveman, R. and J. Schwabish. 2000. “Has Macroeconomic Performance Regained Its Antipoverty Bite?” Contemporary Economic Policy 18:415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffman, S. and L. Seidman. 1988. The Earned Income Tax Credit: Antipoverty Effectiveness and Labor Market Effects. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  29. Hurst, E. and J. Ziliak. 2002. “Welfare Reform and Household Saving.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
  30. Iceland, J. 2003. “Why Poverty Remains High: The Role of Income Growth, Economic Inequality, and Changes in Family Structure, 1949–1999.” Demography 40:499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katz, L. and D. Autor. 1999. “Changes in the Wage Structure and Earnings Inequality.” Pp. 3309–415 in Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3A, edited by O. Ashenfelter and D. Card. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  32. Kniesner, T. and J. Ziliak. 2002. “Explicit Versus Implicit Income Insurance.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 25:5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, D. 1999. “Wage Inequality in the United States During the 1980s: Rising Dispersion or Falling Minimum Wage?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114:977–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lichter, D. and M. Crowley. 2002. “Poverty in America: Beyond Welfare Reform.” Population Bulletin 57(2):1–36.Google Scholar
  35. Martini, A. and M. Wiseman. 1997. “Explaining the Recent Decline in Welfare Caseloads: Is the Council of Economic Advisers Right?” Unpublished manuscript, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, B. and D. Rosenbaum. 2000. “Making Single Mothers Work: Recent Tax and Welfare Policy and Its Effects.” National Tax Journal 53:1027–62.Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, B. and J. Sullivan. 2001. “The Effects of Welfare and Tax Reform: The Material Well-being of Single-Mothers in the 1980s and 1990s.” Working Paper No. 8298. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  38. —. 2003. “Measuring the Well Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption.” Journal of Human Resources 38:1180–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moffitt, R. 1999. “The Effect of Pre-PRWORA Waivers on AFDC Caseloads and Female Earnings, Income, and Labor Force Behavior.” Pp. 91–118 in Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform, edited by S. Danziger. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  40. Neumark, D. and W. Wascher. 2001. “Using the EITC to Help Poor Families: New Evidence and a Comparison With the Minimum Wage.” National Tax Journal 54:281–317.Google Scholar
  41. —. 2002. “State-Level Estimates of Minimum Wage Effects: New Evidence and Interpretations From Disequilibrium Models.” Journal of Human Resources 37(1):35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nickell, S. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models With Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 49:1399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Primus, W., L. Rawlings, K. Larin, and K. Porter. 1999. “The Initial Impacts of Welfare Reform on the Incomes of Single-Mother Families.” Report. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.Google Scholar
  44. Sawhill, I. 1988. “Poverty in the U.S.: Why Is It So Persistent?” Journal of Economic Literature 6:1073–119.Google Scholar
  45. Saxonhouse, G. 1976. “Estimated Parameters as Dependent Variables.” American Economic Review 66:178–83.Google Scholar
  46. Schoeni, R. and R. Blank. 2000. “What has Welfare Reform Accomplished? Impacts on Welfare Participation, Employment, Income, Poverty, and Family Structure.” Working Paper No. 7627. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  47. Sen, A. 1976. “Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement.” Econometrica 44:219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. “Sharp Increase in Marriages of Teenagers Found in 90’s.” 2002. New York Times, November 10, p. 26.Google Scholar
  49. Solon, G., R. Barsky, and J. Parker. 1994. “Measuring the Cyclicality of Real Wages: How Important Is Composition Bias?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stevens, A. 1999. “Climbing Out of Poverty, Falling Back In: Measuring the Persistence of Poverty Over Multiple Spells.” Journal of Human Resources 34:557–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ventry, D. 2000. “The Collision of Tax and Welfare Politics: The Political History of the Earned Income Tax Credit, 1969–99.” National Tax Journal 53:983–1026.Google Scholar
  52. Wemmerus, N. and K. Porter. 1996. An Ethnographic Analysis of Zero-Income Households in the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.Google Scholar
  53. Wooldridge, J. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wu, X., J. Perloff, and A. Golan. 2002. “Effects of Government Policies on Income Distribution and Welfare.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California-Berkeley.Google Scholar
  55. Ziliak, J., D. Figlio, E. Davis, and L. Connolly. 2000. “Accounting for the Decline in AFDC Caseloads: Welfare Reform or the Economy?” Journal of Human Resources 35:570–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ziliak, J., C. Gundersen, and D. Figlio. 2003. “Food Stamp Caseloads Over the Business Cycle.” Southern Economic Journal 69:903–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ziliak, J., B. Wilson, and J. Stone. 1999. “Spatial Dynamics and Heterogeneity in the Cyclicality of Real Wages.” Review of Economics and Statistics 81:227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig Gundersen
    • 1
  • James P. Ziliak
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesIowa State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KentuckyLexington

Personalised recommendations