Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 589–603 | Cite as

Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis?

  • S. Philip Morgan
Article

Abstract

Nearly half of the world’s population in 2000 lived in countries with fertility rates at or below replacement level, and nearly all countries will reach low fertility levels in the next two decades. Concerns about low fertility, fertility that is well below replacement, are widespread. But there are both persistent rationales for having children and institutional adjustments that can make the widespread intentions for two children attainable, even in increasingly individualistic and egalitarian societies.

Keywords

Total Fertility Rate Replacement Level Fertility Transition Nonmarital Birth World Population Prospect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bianchi, S.M. 2000. “Maternal Employment and Time With Children: Dramatic Change or Surprising Continuity?” Demography 37:401–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianchi, S.M., M.A. Milkie, L.C. Sayer, and J.P. Robinson. 2000. “Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor.” Social Forces 79(1):191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blake, J. 1972. “Coercive Pronatalism and American Population Policy.” Pp. 81–109 in Commission on Population and the American Future, Vol. 6: Research Reports, edited by R. Parke and C.F. Westoff. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Bongaarts, J. 2001a. The End of the Fertility Transition in the Developed World. Population Research Division Working Paper No. 152. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  5. — 2001b. “Fertility and Reproductive Preferences in Post-Transitional Societies.” Pp. 260–81 in Global Fertility Transition, edited by R.A. Bulatao and J.B. Casterline. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  6. — 2002. “The End of Fertility Transition in the Developed World.” Population and Development Review 28:419–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bongaarts, J. and R.A. Bulatao, eds. 2000. Beyond Six Billion: Forecasting the World’s Population. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bongaarts, J. and G. Feeney. 1998. “On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility.” Population and Development Review 24:271–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bongaarts, J. and S.C. Watkins. 1996. “Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions.” Population and Development Review 22:639–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchanan, P.J. 2002. The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.Google Scholar
  11. Bulatao, R.A. 1981. “Values and Disvalues of Children in Successive Childbearing Decisions.” Demography 18:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bumpass, L. 1990. “What’s Happening to the Family? Interactions Between Demographic and Institutional Change.” Demography 27:483–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, A.A. 1974. “Beyond the Demographic Transition.” Demography 11:549–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherlin, A.J. 1999. “Going to Extremes: Family Structure, Children’s Well-being, and Social Science.” Demography 36:421–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, K. 1963. “The Theory of Change and Response in Modern Demographic History.” Population Index 29:345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demeny, P. 2003. “Population Policy Dilemmas in Europe at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century.” Population and Development Review 29:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DiPrete, T.A., S.P. Morgan, H. Engelhardt, and H. Paclova. Forthcoming. “Do Cross-National Differences in the Costs of Children Generate Cross-National Differences in Fertility Rates?” Population Research and Policy Review.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrlich, P.R. 1974. The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  19. Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman, D., M. Hechter, and S. Kanazawa. 1994. “A Theory of the Value of Children.” Demography 31:375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gershuny, J. 2000. Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ginsborg, P. 2003. Italy and Its Discontents: Family, Civil Society, State, 1980–2001. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Goode, W.J. 1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  25. Hardin, G. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162:1243–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hewlett, S.A. 2002. Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest for Children. New York: Talk Miramax Books.Google Scholar
  27. Hrdy, S.B. 1999. Mother Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants, and Natural Selection. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  28. King, R.B. 2000. “Women’s Fertility in Late Modernity.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sociology Department, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  29. Lam, D. 2003. “Evolutionary Biology and Rational Choice in Models of Fertility.” Offspring: Human Fertility Behavior in Biodemographic Perspective, edited by K.W. Wachter and R.A. Bulatao. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lesthaeghe, R. 1983. “A Century of Demographic and Cultural Change in Western Europe: An Exploration of Underlying Dimensions.” Population and Development Review 9:411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lesthaeghe, R. and J. Surkyn. 1988. “Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change.” Population and Development Review 14:1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lesthaeghe, R. and P. Willems. 1999. “Is Low Fertility a Temporary Phenomenon in the European Union?” Population and Development Review 25:211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lutz, W., B.C. O’Neill, and S. Scherbov. 2003. “Europe’s Population at a Turning Point.” Science 299(5615):1991–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDonald, P.F. 2000. Gender Equity, Social Institutions and the Future of Fertility.” Journal of Population Research 17:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meadows, D.H., D.L. Meadows, R. Jorgens, and W.W. Behrens. 1974. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  36. Morgan, S.P. and K. Hagewen. Forthcoming. “Is Very Low Fertility Inevitable in America? Insights and Forecasts From An Integrative Model of Fertility.” In Creating the Next Generation, edited by A. Booth and A.C. Crouter. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Morgan, S.P. and R.B. King. 2001. “Why Have Children in the 21st Century? Biological Predisposition, Social Coercion, Rational Choice.” European Journal of Population 17:3–20.Google Scholar
  38. Pampel, F.C. 2001. The Institutional Context of Population Change: Patterns of Fertility and Mortality Across High-Income Nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pinker, S. 1997. “Against Nature.” Discover 18:92–95.Google Scholar
  40. — 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  41. Pollard, M.S. and S.P. Morgan. 2002. “Emerging Gender Indifference: Sex Composition of Children and the Third Birth.” American Sociological Review 67:600–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Preston, S.H. 1984. “Children and the Elderly: Divergent Paths for America’s Dependents.” Demography 21:435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quesnel-Vallée, A. and S.P. Morgan. Forthcoming. “Missing the Target? Correspondence of Fertility Intentions and Behavior in the U.S.” Population Research and Policy Review.Google Scholar
  44. Rindfuss, R.R. 1991. “The Young Adult Years: Diversity, Structural Change, and Fertility.” Demography 28:493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rindfuss, R.R. and L.L. Bumpass. 1978. “Age and the Sociology of Fertility: How Old Is Too Old.” Pp. 43–56 in Social Demography, edited by K.E. Taeuber, L.L. Bumpass, and J.A. Sweet. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rindfuss, R.R., K.B. Guzzo, and S.P. Morgan. Forthcoming. “The Changing Institutional Context of Low Fertility.” Population Research and Policy Review.Google Scholar
  47. Ryder, N.B. 1980. “Components of Temporal Variations in American Fertility.” Pp. 15–49 in Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies, edited by R.W. Hiorns. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  48. Teitelbaum, M.S. and J.M. Winter. 1985. The Fear of Population Decline. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Population Division. 2000. World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision, Volume III: Analytical Report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  50. —. 2002. World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision. New York: United Nations. Available on-line at http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2000/chapter1.pdfGoogle Scholar
  51. —. 2003a. World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision. New York: United Nations. Available on-line at http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2002/WPP2002-HIGHLIGHTSrev1.PDFGoogle Scholar
  52. United Nations Population Division. 2003b. World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision Population Database. Available on-line at http://esa.un.org/unpp/Google Scholar
  53. Ventura, S.J., B.E. Hamilton, and P.D. Sutton. 2003. “Revised Birth and Fertility Rates for the United States, 2000 and 2001.” National Vital Statistics Reports 51(4). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  54. Wattenberg, B.J. 1989. The Birth Dearth. New York: Pharos Books.Google Scholar
  55. Westoff, C.F. and N.B. Ryder. 1977. “The Predictive Validity of Reproductive Intentions.” Demography 14:431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wolf, N. 2001 Misconceptions: Truth, Lies, and the Unexpected on the Journey to Motherhood. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Philip Morgan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurham

Personalised recommendations