, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 659–673 | Cite as

Trends in reproductive behavior among young single women in Colombia and Peru: 1985–1999

  • Mohamed M. Ali
  • John Cleland
  • Iqbal H. Shah


Using “calendar” data for single women aged 15-24 from successive Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in Colombia and Peru during the 1990s, we document trends, year by year, in sexual activity, the use of contraceptives, and subsequent reproductive outcomes. We provide evidence of the important and hitherto largely untapped potential of DHS calendar data to draw complete sexual and reproductive profiles when data from various surveys are integrated. Over the period 1985–1999, young single women in both Colombia and Peru became sexually active at younger ages. The use of contraceptives, especially the use of condoms, increased but did not fully offset the rise in sexual activity, and thus the incidence of premarital conceptions rose among young single women. In both countries, sharp declines occurred in the proportion of premaritally conceived births that were reported as being wanted.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, S. and N. Diop-Sidibé. 2003. “Does Use of the Calendar in Surveys Reduce Heaping?” Studies in Family Planning 34(2):127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanc, A.K., S.L. Curtis, and T.N. Croft. 2002. “Monitoring Contraceptive Continuation: Links to Fertility Outcomes and Quality of Care.” Studies in Family Planning 33(2):127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanc, A.K. and A.A. Way. 1998. “Sexual Behaviour, Contraceptive Knowledge and Use.” Studies in Family Planning 29(2):106–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cáceres, C.F., G. Perez-Luna, A.M. Rosasco, and P. Fernandez-Davila. 2000. Situational Diagnosis of Youth Sexual and Reproductive Health in Peru. Project report for “Safe Passages to Adulthood.” Southampton, England: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  5. Caldwell, J.C., P. Caldwell, B.K. Caldwell, and I. Pieris. 1998. “The Construction of Adolescence in a Changing World.” Studies in Family Planning 29(2):137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curtis, S.L. and A.K. Blanc. 1997. Determinants of Contraceptive Failure, Switching, and Discontinuation: An Analysis of DHS Contraceptive Histories. Analytical Report No. 6. Calverton, MD: Macro International.Google Scholar
  7. Fondo Editorial Contradrogas. 1999. Encuesta Nacional Sobre Prevencion y Uso de Drogas— Informe Final. [National Survey on the Prevention and Use of Drugs—Final Report.] Peru: Fondo Editorial Contradrogas.Google Scholar
  8. Gaslonde, S. and E. Carrasco. 1982. The Impact of Some Intermediate Variables on Fertility: Evidence From the Venezuela National Fertility Survey, 1997. WFS Occasional Paper No. 23. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Goldman, N., L. Moreno, and C.F. Westoff. 1989. “Collection of Survey Data on Contraception: An Evaluation of an Experiment in Peru.” Studies in Family Planning 20(3):147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hobcraft, J. and R.J.A. Little. 1984. “Fertility Exposure Analysis; A New Method for Assessing the Contribution of Proximate Determinants to Fertility Differentials.” Population Studies 38(1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mensch, B.S., J. Bruce, and M.E. Greene. 1998. The Uncharted Passage: Girls’ Adolescence in the Developing World. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  12. Population Reference Bureau. 2000. The World’s Youth, 2000. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  13. Ross, J., L. Hardee, E. Mumford, and J.M. Carranza. 2002. “Contraceptive Method Choice in Developing Countries.” International Family Planning Perspectives 28(1):32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Russell, J. and X. Solorzano. 2001. Adolescent and Youth Policy: The Experiences of Colombia, Dominican Republic and Nicaragua. Washington, DC: George Washington University and Pan American Health Organization.Google Scholar
  15. Saavedra, M. 1996. “Young People in Bogota, Colombia Developing Their Own Strategies to Prevent Risky Sexual Behavior.” Siecus Report 24(3):10–12.Google Scholar
  16. Singh, S. 1998. “Adolescent Childbearing.” Studies in Family Planning 29(2):117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh, S. and D. Wulf. 1991. “Estimating Abortion Levels in Brazil, Colombia and Peru, Using Hospital Admissions and Fertility Survey Data.” International Family Planning Perspectives 17(1):8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. StataCorp. 2001. Stata Statistical Software. Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
  19. Strickler, J.A., R.J. Magnani, H.G. McCann, L.E. Brown, and J.C. Rice. 1997. “The Reliability of Reporting of Contraceptive Behaviour in DHS Calendar Data: Evidence From Morocco.” Studies in Family Planning 28(2):44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. UNAIDS. 2000a. Epidemiological Fact Sheets on HIV/AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections: Colombia. Geneva: UNAIDS.Google Scholar
  21. —. 2000b. Epidemiological Fact Sheets on HIV/AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections: Peru. Geneva: UNAIDS.Google Scholar
  22. Westoff, C.F., N. Goldman, and L. Moreno. 1990. Dominican Republic Experimental Study: An Evaluation of Fertility and Child Health Information. Princeton, NJ, and Columbia, MD: Office of Population Research, Princeton University and Institute for Development/Macro Systems.Google Scholar
  23. Zaba, B., T. Boerma, E. Pisani, and N. Baptiste. 2002. Estimation of Levels and Trends in Age at First Sex From Surveys Using Survival Analysis. Measure Evaluation Working Paper WP-02-51. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed M. Ali
    • 1
  • John Cleland
    • 2
  • Iqbal H. Shah
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Reproductive Health and ResearchWorld Health OrganizationGeneva 27Switzerland
  2. 2.Centre for Population StudiesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUK

Personalised recommendations