, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 351–367 | Cite as

Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation

  • Yu Xie
  • James M. Raymo
  • Kimberl Goyette
  • Arland Thornton


This article explores the relationship between economic potential and rates of entry into marriage and cohabitation. Using data from the 1990 census and the 1980–1992 High School and Beyond (Sophomore Cohort), we developed a method for explicitly estimating five time-varying measures of earnings potential. The analyses of union formation are based on an intergenerational panel study of parents and children, to which our measures of earnings potential were appended. The results indicate that all five measures of earnings potential strongly and positively influence the likelihood of marriage for men, but not for women. Earnings potential does not affect entry into cohabiting unions for either men or women.


Educational Attainment Economic Potential Marriage Market Future Earning Earning Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, G.S. 1973. “A Theory of Marriage: Part I.” Journal of Political Economy 81:813–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. — 1974. “A Theory of Marriage: Part II.” Journal of Political Economy 82:S11-S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. — 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, N.G., D.E. Bloom, and P.H. Craig. 1989. “The Divergence of Black and White Marriage Patterns.” American Journal of Sociology 95:692–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchi, S.M. and D. Spain. 1986. American Women in Transition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Bumpass, L. and H.-H. Lu. 2000. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts in the United States.” Population Studies 54:29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bumpass, L.L. and J.A. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 26:615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bumpass, L.L., J.A. Sweet, and A. Cherlin. 1991. “The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:913–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherlin, A.J. 1992. Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clarkberg, M. 1999. “The Price of Partnering: The Role of Economic Well-being in Young Adults’ First Union Experiences.” Social Forces 77:945–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooney, T.M. and D.P. Hogan. 1991. “Family-Building Patterns of Professional Women: A Comparison of Lawyers, Physicians, and Postsecondary Teachers.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:749–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freedman, D., A. Thornton, D. Camburn, D. Alwin, and L. Young-DeMarco. 1988. “The Life History Calendar: A Technique for Collecting Retrospective Data.” Sociological Methodology 18:37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldscheider, F.K. and L.J. Waite. 1986. “Sex Differences in the Entry Into Marriage.” American Journal of Sociology 92:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldstein, J.R. and C.T. Kenney. 2001. “Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for U.S. Women.” American Sociological Review 66:506–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lichter, D.T., F.B. LeClere, and D.K. McLaughlin. 1991. “Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women.” American Journal of Sociology 96:843–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lichter, D.T., D.K. McLaughlin, G. Kephart, and D.J. Landry. 1992. “Race and the Retreat From Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?” American Sociological Review 57:781–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lloyd, K.M. and S.J. South. 1996. “Contextual Influences on Young Men’s Transition to First Marriage.” Social Forces 74:1097–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacDonald, M.M. and R.R. Rindfuss. 1981. “Earnings, Relative Income, and Family Formation.” Demography 18:123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, W.D. 1995. “Cohabitation, Marriage, and Entry Into Motherhood.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 57:191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mare, R.D. and C. Winship. 1991. “Socioeconomic Change and the Decline of Marriage for Blacks and Whites.” Pp. 175–202 in The Urban Underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P.E. Peterson. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Mincer, J. 1974. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mincer, J. and S. Polachek. 1974. “Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women.” Journal of Political Economy 82:S76-S108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oppenheimer, V.K. 1988. “A Theory of Marriage Timing.” American Journal of Sociology 94: 563–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. — 1994. “Women’s Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies.” Population and Development Review 20:293–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. — 1997. “Women’s Employment and the Gains to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model of Marriage.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oppenheimer, V.K., H.-P. Blossfeld, and A. Wackerow. 1995. “United States of America.” Pp. 150–73 in The New Role of Women: Family Formation in Modern Societies. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. Oppenheimer, V.K., M. Kalmijn, and N. Lim. 1997. “Men’s Career Development and Marriage Timing During a Period of Rising Inequality.” Demography 34:311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oppenheimer, V.K. and V. Lew. 1995. “American Marriage Formation in the 1980s: How Important Was Women’s Economic Independence?” Pp. 105–38 in Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries, edited by K.O. Mason and A.-M. Jensen. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Polachek, S.W. 1979. “Occupational Segregation Among Women: Theory, Evidence, and a Prognosis.” Pp. 137–57 in Women in the Labor Market, edited by C.B. Lloyd, E.S. Andrews, and C.L. Gilroy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. — 1981. “Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in Occupational Structure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 63:60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Powers, D.A. and Y. Xie. 2000. Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Preston, S.H. and A.T. Richards. 1975. “The Influence of Women’s Work Opportunities on Marriage Rates.” Demography 12:209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raley, R.K. 1996. “A Shortage of Marriageable Men? A Note on the Role of Cohabitation in Black-White Differences in Marriage Rates.” American Sociological Review 61:973–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rindfuss, R.R. and A. Van den Heuvel. 1990. “Cohabitation: A Precursor to Marriage or an Alternative to Being Single?” Population and Development Review 16:703–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sassler, S. and F.K. Goldscheider. 1997. “Revisiting Jane Austen’s Theory of Marriage Timing: Union Formation Among Men in the Late 20th Century.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC, March 27–29.Google Scholar
  36. Sassler, S. and R. Schoen. 1999. “The Effect of Attitudes and Economic Activity on Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 61:147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoen, R. and R.M. Weinick. 1991. “Cohabitation, Marriage, and the Division of Labor.” Papers on Population WP 91–10. Baltimore, MD: Hopkins Population Center, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  38. Smock, P.J. and W.D. Manning. 1997. “Cohabiting Partners’ Economic Circumstances and Marriage.” Demography 34:331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spain, D. and S.M. Bianchi. 1996. Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment Among American Women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Sweeney, M.M. 1999. “Reconsidering the Importance of Women’s Economic Prospects for Marriage: The Roles of Expected Earnings Trajectories and Uncertainty.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New York, March 25–27.Google Scholar
  41. — 2002. “Two Decades of Family Change: The Shifting Economic Foundations of Marriage.” American Sociological Review 67:132–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sweet, J.A. and L.L. Bumpass. 1987. American Families and Households. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Teachman, J.D., K.A. Polonko, and G.K. Leigh. 1987. “Marital Timing: Race and Sex Comparisons.” Social Forces 66:239–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thornton, A. 1988. “Cohabitation and Marriage in the 1980s.” Demography 25:497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thornton, A., W.G. Axinn, and J.D. Teachman. 1995. “The Influence of School Enrollment and Accumulation on Cohabitation and Marriage in Early Adulthood.” American Sociological Review 60:762–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thornton, A., R. Freedman, and W.G. Axinn. 2002. “Intergenerational Panel Study of Parents and Children.” Pp. 315–45 in Looking at Lives: American Longitudinal Studies of the Twentieth Century, edited by E. Phelps, F.F. Furstenberg, Jr., and A. Colby. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  47. Waite, L.J. and G.D. Spitze. 1981. “Young Women’s Transition to Marriage.” Demography 18: 681–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Xie
    • 1
  • James M. Raymo
    • 2
  • Kimberl Goyette
    • 3
  • Arland Thornton
    • 4
  1. 1.Population Studies Center, Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyTemple UniversityUSA
  4. 4.Survey Research Center, Population Studies Center, and Department of SociologyUniversity of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations