, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 191–200 | Cite as

Parental leave: The impact of recent legislation on parents’ leave taking

  • Wen-Jui Han
  • Jane WaldfogelEmail author


We use data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation to examine the impact of leave entitlements on unpaid leave usage by men and women after the birth of a child from 1991 to 1999. The results indicate that legislation providing the right to unpaid leave has not affected men’s leave usage. The results for women are mixed: in some specifications, leave entitlements are associated with increased leave taking or longer leaves, but the results depend on how we define leave coverage. Our results point to the limited impact of unpaid leave policies and the potential importance of paid-leave policies.


Parental Leave State Fixed Effect Monthly Labor Review Longe Leave Unpaid Leave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cantor, D., J. Kerwin, K. Levin, S. Heltemes, and D. Becher. 1995. The Impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act: A Survey of Employers. Rockville, MD: Westat.Google Scholar
  2. Cantor, D., J. Waldfogel, J. Kerwin, M. McKinley Wright, K. Levin, J. Rauch, T. Hagerty, and M.S. Kadula. 2001. Balancing the Needs of Families and Employers: Family and Medical Leave Surveys, 2000 Update. Rockville, MD: Westat.Google Scholar
  3. Hofferth, S. 1996. “Effects of Public and Private Policies on Working After Childbirth.” Work and Occupations 23:378–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hyde, J.S., M. Essex, and F. Horton. 1993. “Fathers and Parental Leave: Attitudes and Experiences.” Journal of Family Issues 14:616–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Klerman, J.A. and A. Leibowitz. 1994. “The Work-Employment Distinction Among New Mothers.” Journal of Human Resources 29:277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —. 1997. “Labor Supply Effects of State Maternity Leave Legislation.” Pp. 65–91 in Gender and Family Issues in the Workplace, edited by F. Blau and R. Ehrenberg. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Klerman, J.A. and A. Leibowitz. 1998. “FMLA and the Labor Supply of New Mothers: Evidence From the June CPS.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, April 2–4.Google Scholar
  8. Malin, M. 1994. “Fathers and Parental Leave.” Texas Law Review 72:1047–95.Google Scholar
  9. — 1998. “Fathers and Parental Leave Revisited.” Northern University Law Review 19:25–56.Google Scholar
  10. Pleck, J. 1993. “Are ‘Family-Supportive’ Employer Policies Relevant to Men?” Pp. 217–37 in Men, Work, and Family, edited by J.C. Hood. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Ross Phillips, K. 1998. “Labor Pains: The Effects of the Family and Medical Leave Act on Recent Mothers’ Returns to Work After Childbirth.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, April 2–4.Google Scholar
  12. Ruhm, C. 1998. “The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons From Europe.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113:285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — 2000. “Parental Leave and Child Health.” Journal of Health Economics 19:931–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Waldfogel, J. 1999a. “Family Leave Coverage in the 1990s.” Monthly Labor Review October:13–21.Google Scholar
  15. — 1999b. “The Impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18:281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Waldfogel, J. 2001. “Family and Medical Leave: Evidence From the 2000 Surveys.” Monthly Labor Review September:17–23.Google Scholar
  17. Women’s Legal Defense Fund. 1993. “State Laws and Regulations Guaranteeing Employees Their Jobs After Family and Medical Leaves.” Photocopied document. Washington, DC: Women’s Legal Defense Fund (now National Partnership for Women and Families).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Associate Professor of Social Work and Public AffairsColumbia University School of Social WorkNew York

Personalised recommendations