Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 739–761 | Cite as

Fertility and development: evidence from Brazil

  • Joseph E. Potter
  • Carl P. Schmertmann
  • Suzana M. Cavenaghi
Article

Abstract

Using microdata from the Brazilian demographic censuses of 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1991, aggregated into 518 consistently defined spatial units called microregions, we estimated fertility and mortality and constructed indicators of development and living conditions in the rural and urban areas of the microregions in each census. We then estimated cross-sectional and fixed-effects models to answer questions about the degree to which changes in these indicators are associated with changes in fertility and whether the relationship between fertility and development shifts through time. We found strong and consistent relationships between the decline in fertility and measurable changes in social and economic circumstances.

Keywords

Total Fertility Rate Fertility Decline Fertility Transition Female Labor Force Participation Fertility Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axinn, W.G. and S.T. Yabiku. 2001. “Social Change, and the Social Organization of Families, and Fertility Limitation.” American Journal of Sociology 106:1219–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, W. 1995. The Brazilian Economy: Growth and Development. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Birdsall, N. and R.H. Sabot, eds. 1996. Opportunity Foregone: Education in Brazil. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bocquet-Appel, J.P., I.S. Rajan, J.N. Barco, and C. Lajaunie. 2002. “The Onset of India’s Fertility Transition.” European Journal of Population 18:211–32.Google Scholar
  5. Bongaarts, J. and S.C. Watkins. 1996. “Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions.” Population and Development Review 22:639–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J.C. and T.W. Guinnane. 2002. “Fertility Transition in a Rural, Catholic Population: Bavaria, 1880–1910.” Population Studies 56:35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brusco, E. 1995. The Reformation of Machismo: Evangelical Protestantism and Gender in Colombia. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  8. Caldwell, J.C. 1982. A Theory of Fertility Decline. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cleland, J. and C. Wilson. 1987. “Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View.” Population Studies 41:5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coale, A.J. 1973. “The Demographic Transition Reconsidered.” Pp. 53–57 in Proceedings of the International Population Conference, Liège, 1973. Liège, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  11. Coale, A.J. and P. Demeny. 1966. Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coale, A.J. and S.C. Watkins. 1986. The Decline of Fertility in Europe: The Revised Proceedings of a Conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cornwell, G.T. and W.C. Robinson. 1988. “Fertility of U.S. Farm Women During the Electrification Era, 1930–1950.” Population Research and Policy Review 7:277–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Jong, G.F., W.C. Robinson, M.N. Hoque, and G.T. Cornwell. 1989. “Rural Electrification and Fertility Attitudes and Behaviour in Bangladesh.” Pp. 317–28 in International Population Conference, New Delhi, September 20–27, 1989, Vol. 2. Liège, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  15. Dreze, J. and M. Murthi. 2001. “Fertility, Education, and Development: Evidence From India.” Population and Development Review 27:33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterlin, R.A. and E.M. Crimmins. 1985. The Fertility Revolution: A Supply-Demand Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Faria, V.E. 1989. “Políticas de governo e regulação da fecundidade: Consequências não antecipadas e efeitos perversos.” Ciências Sociais Hoje 5:62–103.Google Scholar
  18. Faria, V.E. and J.E. Potter. 1999. “Television, Telenovelas, and Fertility Change in Northeast Brazil.” Pp. 252–72 in Dynamics of Values in Fertility Change, edited by R. Leete. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Freedman, R. 1979. “Theories of Fertility Decline: A Reappraisal.” Social Forces 58:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (FIBGE). 1960. Censo Demográfico de 1960: VII Recenseamento Geral do Brasil. Série Nacional, Vol 1. Rio de Janeiro: Departamento de Estatísticas de População, FIBGE.Google Scholar
  21. —. 1982. Censo Demográfico de 1980. Rio de Janeiro: FIBGE.Google Scholar
  22. Galloway, P.R., E.A. Hammel, and R.D. Lee. 1994. “Fertility Decline in Prussia, 1875–1910: A Pooled Cross-Section Time Series Analysis.” Population Studies 48:135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galloway, P.R., R.D. Lee, and E.A. Hammel. 1998a. “Infant Mortality and the Fertility Transition: Macro Evidence From Europe and New Findings From Prussia.” Pp. 182–226 in From Death to Birth: Mortality Decline and Reproductive Change, edited by M. Montgomery and B. Cohen. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  24. —. 1998b. “Urban Versus Rural: Fertility Decline in the Cities and Rural Districts of Prussia, 1875 to 1910.” European Journal of Population 14:209–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gertler, P.J. and J.W. Molyneaux. 1994. “How Economic Development and Family Planning Programs Combined to Reduce Indonesian Fertility.” Demography 31:33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greene, W.H. 1997. Econometric Analysis, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Hamburger, E. 1998. “Diluindo Fronteiras: A Televisão e as Novelas no Cotidiano.” Pp. 439–88 in História da Vida Privada no Brasil, edited by L.M. Schwarcz. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  28. — 2001. “Representações Sobre Reprodução em Telenovelas Brasileiras, 1970–1997.” Chap.11 in Saúde Reprodutiva na Esfera Pública e Política na América Latina, edited by M.C. Albino de Oliveira and M.I. Baltar da Rocha. Campinas, Brazil: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
  29. Hirschman, C. and P. Guest. 1990a. “The Emerging Demographic Transitions of Southeast Asia.” Population and Development Review 16:121–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. —. 1990b. “Multilevel Models of Fertility Determination in Four Southeast Asian Countries: 1970 and 1980.” Demography 27:369–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirschman, C. and Y.J. Young. 1999. “The Decline of Fertility in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines: 1968–70 to 1988–90.” Working Paper 99–12. Seattle: Population Research Center, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  32. Hoque, M.N. 1988. “Rural Electrification and Its Impact on Fertility: Evidence From Bangladesh.” Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms International: 8818077.Google Scholar
  33. Knodel, J., N. Havanon, and A. Pramualratana. 1984. “Fertility Transition in Thailand: A Qualitative Analysis.” Population and Development Review 10:297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knodel, J. and E. Van de Walle. 1979. “Lessons From the Past: Policy Implications of Historical Fertility Studies.” Population and Development Review 5:217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lam, D. and S. Duryea. 1999. “Effects of Schooling on Fertility, Labor Supply, and Investments in Children, With Evidence From Brazil.” Journal of Human Resources 34:160–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lehmann, D. 1996. Struggle for the Spirit: Religious Transformation and Popular Culture in Brazil and Latin America. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Martine, G. 1996. “Brazil’s Fertility Decline, 1965–95: A Fresh Look at Key Factors.” Population and Development Review 22:47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mason, K.O. 1997. “Explaining Fertility Transitions.” Demography 34:443–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merrick, T.W. and E. Berquo. 1983. The Determinants of Brazil’s Recent Rapid Decline in Fertility. Committee on Population and Demography Report No. 23. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  40. Montgomery, M.R. and J.B. Casterline. 1993. “The Diffusion of Fertility Control in Taiwan: Evidence From Pooled Cross-Section Time-Series Models.” Population Studies 47:457–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Potter, J.E. 1999. “The Persistence of Outmoded Contraceptive Regimes: The Cases of Mexico and Brazil.” Population And Development Review 25:703–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rios-Neto, E.L.G. 1987. Class and Institutional Determinants of Rural Fertility in Brazil. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
  43. Rios-Neto, E.L.G. 2001. “Television, Value Constructs, and Reproductive Behavior in Brazilian Excluded Communities.” Paper presented at IUSSP General Population Conference, August 19–24, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.Google Scholar
  44. Rodrigues, I.A. 2001. A Demografia da Vida Rural Paulista. Ph.D. dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
  45. Rodríguez, G. 1996. “The Spacing and Limiting Components of the Fertility Transition in Latin America.” Pp. 27–47 in The Fertility Transition in Latin America, edited by J.M. Guzmán, S. Singh, G. Rodríguez, and E.A. Pantelides. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rosero-Bixby, L. and J. Casterline. 1994. “Interaction Diffusion and Fertility Transition in Costa Rica.” Social Forces 73:435–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharlin, A. 1986. “Urban-Rural Differences in Fertility in Europe During the Demographic Transition.” Pp. 234–60 in The Decline of Fertility in Europe: The Revised Proceedings of a Conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project, edited by A.J. Coale and S.C. Watkins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Thornton, A. 2001. “The Developmental Paradigm, Reading History Sideways, and Family Change.” Demography 38:449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tolnay, S.E. 1995. “The Spatial Diffusion of Fertility: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Counties in the American South, 1940.” American Sociological Review 60:299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watkins, S.C. 1987. “The Fertility Transition: Europe and the Third World Compared.” Sociological Forum 2:645–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weller, R. 1984. “The Gainful Employment of Females and Fertility—With Special Reference to Rural Areas of Developing Countries.” Pp. 151–71 in Rural Development and Human Fertility, edited by W.A. Schutjer and C.S. Stokes. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. World Bank. 1984. World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph E. Potter
    • 1
  • Carl P. Schmertmann
    • 2
  • Suzana M. Cavenaghi
    • 3
  1. 1.Population Research CenterUniversity of TexasAustin
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Center for the Study of PopulationFlorida State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Nucleus for Population StudiesUniversity of CampinasUSA

Personalised recommendations