Demography

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 713–738 | Cite as

Social networks and changes in contraceptive use over time: Evidence from a longitudinal study in rural Kenya

  • Jere R. Behrman
  • Hans-Peter Kohler
  • Susan Cotts Watkins
Article

Abstract

The impacts of social networks on changes in contraception in rural Kenya are investigated using special data from a longitudinal household survey. An analytic model, informed by detailed knowledge of the setting, yielded estimates that indicate that (1) social networks have substantial effects even after unobserved factors (e.g., homophily) that may determine social networks are controlled; (2) controlling for these unobserved factors may substantially alter the estimated effects of networks (these controls were not used in previous studies); (3) network effects are important for both men and women; and (4) network effects are nonlinear and asymmetric, suggesting that networks provide information primarily through social learning, rather than by exerting social influence.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderman, H., J.R. Behrman, H.-P. Kohler, J. Maluccio, and S.C. Watkins. 2001. “Attrition in Longitudinal Household Survey Data: Some Tests for Three Developing Country Samples.” Demographic Research 5(4):79–123. Available on-line at http://www.demographic-research.orgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashenfelter, O. and A. Krueger. 1994. “Estimates of the Economic Return to Schooling From a New Sample of Twins.” American Economic Review 84:1157–74.Google Scholar
  3. Axinn, W.G. and S.T. Yabiku. 2001. “Social Change, the Social Organization of Families, and Fertility Limitation.” American Journal of Sociology 106:1219–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayodo, A. 1994. “Definitions of the Self in Luo Women’s Orature.” Research in African Literatures 25:121–29.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G.S. and G.H. Lewis. 1973. “On the Interaction Between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 81(2, Part 2):S279–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, P. M. 1994. Structural Contexts of Opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bongaarts, J. and S. C. Watkins. 1996. “Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions.” Population and Development Review 22:639–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bound, J., D.A. Jaeger, and R.M. Baker. 1995. “Problems With Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable Is Weak.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brass, W. and C.L.E. Jolly. 1993. Population Dynamics of Kenya. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brewer, D. 2000. “Forgetting in the Recall-Based Elicitation of Personal and Social Networks.” Social Networks 22:29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewer, D. and C. Webster. 2000. “Forgetting of Friends and Its Effects on Measuring Friendship Networks.” Social Networks 21:361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brock, W.A. and S.N. Durlauf. 2001. “Discrete Choice With Social Interactions.” Review of Economic Studies 68:235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casterline, J.B. 2001. “Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Introduction.” Pp. 1–38 in Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition, edited by J.B. Casterline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Entwisle, B. and J. Godley. 1998. “Village Networks and Patterns of Contraceptive Choice.” Paper presented at a meeting of the Population Committee of the National Academy of Sciences, January 29–30, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Entwisle, B., R.R. Rindfuss, D.K. Guilkey, A. Chamratrithirong, S.R. Curran, and Y. Sawangdee. 1996. “Community and Contraceptive Choice in Rural Thailand: A Case Study of Nang Rong,” Demography 33:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ezeh, A.C. and G. Mboup. 1997. “Estimates and Explanations of Gender Differentials in Contraceptive Prevalence Rates.” Studies in Family Planning 28:104–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer, C. 1982. To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Freedman, D. 1999. “From Association to Causation: Some Remarks on the History of Statistics.” Statistical Science 14(3):243–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedkin, N.E. 1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedkin, N.E. and K.S. Cook. 1990. “Peer Group Influence.” Sociological Methods and Research 19:122–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griliches, Z. 1979. “Sibling Models and Data in Economics: Beginning of a Survey.” Journal of Political Economy 87(2, Part 2):S37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsiao, C. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Katz, E. and P.F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 1993. 1994. Nairobi, Kenya: National Council for Population and Development, Central Bureau of Statistics, and Calverton, MD. Macro International.Google Scholar
  25. Kohler, H.-P. 1997. “Learning in Social Networks and Contraceptive Choice.” Demography 34:369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. — 1998. “Bias in the Estimation of Density on the Basis of Ego-centric Networks With Truncated Size.” Unpublished manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.Google Scholar
  27. — 2000a. “Fertility Decline as a Coordination Problem.” Journal of Development Economics 63:231–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. — 2000b. “Social Interaction and Fluctuations in Birth Rates.” Population Studies 54:223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. — 2001. Fertility and Social Interaction: An Economic Perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kohler, H.-P., J.R. Behrman, and S.C. Watkins. 2000. “Empirical Assessments of Social Networks, Fertility and Family Planning Programs: Nonlinearities and Their Implications.” Demographic Research 3(7):1–37. Available on-line at http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol3Google Scholar
  31. —. 2001. “The Density of Social Networks and Family Planning Decisions: Evidence From South Nyanza District, Kenya.” Demography 38:43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manski, C.F. 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60:531–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. —. 1995. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Manski, C.F. and D.S. Nagin. 1998. “Bounding Disagreements About Treatment Effects: A Case Study of Sentencing and Recidivism.” Sociological Methodology 28:99–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marsden, P.V. 1988. “Homogeneity in Confiding Relations.” Social Networks 10:57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, K.A., E.M. Zulu, and S.C. Watkins. 2001. “Gender Roles and Husband-Wife Survey Responses in Malawi.” Studies in Family Planning 32:161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Montgomery, M.R. and J.B. Casterline. 1993. “The Diffusion of Fertility Control in Taiwan: Evidence From Pooled Cross-Section, Time-Series Models.” Population Studies 47:457–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. —. 1996. “Social Learning, Social Influence, and New Models of Fertility.” Pp. 151–75 in Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories, Population and Development, edited by J.B. Casterline, R.D. Lee and K.A. Foote. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  39. Montgomery, M.R. and W. Chung. 1994. “Social Networks and the Diffusion of Fertility Control: The Korean Case.” Pp. 179–208 in Values and Fertility Change, edited by R. Leete. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Montgomery, M.R., G.-E. Kiros, D. Agyeman, J.B. Casterline, P. Aglobitse, and P.C. Hewett. 2001. “Social Networks and Contraceptive Dynamics in Southern Ghana.” Working Paper No. 153. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  41. Moscovici, S. 1985. “Social Influences and Conformity.” Pp. 347–412 in Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 2, edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  42. Munshi, K. and J. Myaux. 2000. “Social Change and Individual Decisions: With an Application to the Demographic Transition.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  43. Palloni, A. 2001. “Diffusion in Sociological Analysis.” Pp. 66–114 in Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition, edited by J.B. Casterline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rutenberg, N. and S.C. Watkins. 1997. “The Buzz Outside the Clinics: Conversations and Contraception in Nyanza Province, Kenya.” Studies in Family Planning 28:290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schelling, T.C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  48. Schiller, R.J. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Short, S.E., F. Chen, B. Entwisle, and Z. Fengying. 2002. “Maternal Work and Child Care in China: A Multi-Method Analysis. Population and Development Review 28:31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. “Special Issue: Attrition in Longitudinal Surveys.” Journal of Human Resources Spring 1998.Google Scholar
  51. Stolzenberg, R.M. and D.A. Relles. 1997. “Assessing and Correcting Sample Selection Bias.” American Sociological Review 62:494–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valente, T.W. 1994. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  53. Valente, T.W. and W. Saba. 1998. “Mass Media and Interpersonal Influence in a Reproductive Health Communication Campaign in Bolivia.” Communication Research 25:96–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. —. 2001. “Campaign Recognition and Interpersonal Communication as Factors in Contraceptive Use in Bolivia” Journal of Health Communication 6(4):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Valente, T.W., S.C. Watkins, M.N. Jato, A. van der Straten, and L.-P. Tsitsol. 1997. “Social Network Associations With Contraceptive Use Among Cameroonian Women in Voluntary Associations.” Social Science and Medicine 45:677–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Watkins, S.C. 2000. “Local and Foreign Models of Reproduction in Nyanza Province, Kenya, 1930–1998.” Population and Development Review 26:725–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watkins, S.C. and D. Hodgson. 1998. “From Mercantilists to Neo-Malthusians: The International Population Movement and the Transformation of Population Ideology in Kenya.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Social Processes Underlying Fertility Change in Developing Countries, Committee on Population, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, January 29–30.Google Scholar
  58. Watkins, S.C., N. Rutenberg, and D. Wilkinson. 1997. “Orderly Theories, Disorderly Women.” Pp. 213–45 in The Continuing Demographic Transition, edited by G.W. Jones, R.M. Douglas, J.C. Caldwell and R. M. D’Souza. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  59. Watkins, S.C. and I. Warriner. 2000. “How Are Networks Selected?” Unpublished manuscript, Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  60. Weinreb, A. 2001. “First Politics, Then Culture: Accounting for Ethnic Differences in Demographic Behavior in Kenya.” Population and Development Review 27:437–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. White, K. and S.C. Watkins. 2000. “Accuracy, Stability and Reciprocity in Informal Conversational Networks in Rural Kenya.” Social Networks 366:1–19.Google Scholar
  62. Willis, R.J. 1973. “A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 81(2, Part. 2):14–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Winship, C. and S.L. Morgan. 1999. “The Estimation of Causal Effects From Observational Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 25:659–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jere R. Behrman
    • 1
  • Hans-Peter Kohler
    • 2
  • Susan Cotts Watkins
    • 2
  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations