, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 569–571 | Cite as

One step back in understanding racial differences in birth weight

  • Tukufu Zuberi
Exchange: Racial differences in Birth Weight


In recognition of the biological and social connections in demographic processes, demographers have integrated biological factors into their models of population variation. This new effort has tended to focus on the analysis of fertility and mortality. Edwin J.C.G. van den Oord and David C. Rowe’s article, “Racial Differences in Birth Health Risk: A Quantitative Genetic Approach,” published in the August 2000 issue of Demography, is part of this effort. These authors use race as a proxy for genetic variation, which subverts even the most positive attempts to understand the impact of genetic variation on demographic processes. The authors’ statistical results restate their anachronistic theory of race using latent variables that are not open to empirical testing. Although new data increase the opportunities for the examination of the relationship between biology and demographic processes researchers must be vigilant not to commit the errors of the past by misusing race as a variable.


Birth Weight Skin Color Causal Effect Racial Difference Causal Inference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, J., A. Hermalin, D. Lam, and P. Smouse, eds. 1990. Convergent Issues in Genetics and Demography. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N.B. and C.A. Armstead. 1995. “Toward Understanding the Association of Socioeconomic Status and Health: A New Challenge for the Biopsychosocial Approach.” Psychosomatic Medicine 57:213–25.Google Scholar
  3. Bowman, J.E. and R.F. Murray. 1990. Genetic Variation and Disorders in Peoples of African Origin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chakraborty, R., M. Kamboh, M. Nwannkwo, and R. Ferrel. 1992. “Caucasian Genes in American Blacks: New Data.” American Journal of Human Genetics 50:145–55.Google Scholar
  5. Chase, A. 1980. The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the New Scientific Racism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, R. 1984. “A Note on the Biologic Concept of Race and Its Application in Epidemiologic Research.” American Heart Journal 108(3,2):715–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cramer, J.C. 1995. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in Birthweight: The Role of Income and Financial Assistance.” Demography 32:231–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fortney, N.D. 1977. “The Anthropological Concept of Race.” Journal of Black Studies 8:35–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holland, P.W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81:945–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marks, J. 1995. Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race, and History. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, L.G. and B.J. Soldo, eds. 1997. Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Health of Older Americans. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. McDaniel, A. 1996. “Fertility and Racial Stratification.” Population and Development Review 22 (supp):134–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Presser, H.B. 1978. “Age at Menarche, Socio-Sexual Behavior, and Fertility.” Social Biology 25(2):94–101.Google Scholar
  14. Rowe, D.C., A.T. Vazsonyi, and D.J. Flannery. 1994. “No More Than Skin Deep: Ethnic and Racial Similarity in Developmental Process.” Psychology Review 101:396–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rushton, J.P. 1995. Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  16. Rushton, J.P. and A.F. Bogaert. 1987. “Race Differences in Sexual Behavior: Testing and Evolutionary Hypothesis.” Journal of Research in Personality 21:529–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sobel, M.E. 1994. “Causal Inference in Latent Variable Models.” Pp. 3–35 in Latent Variables Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research, edited by A. von Eye and C.C. Clogg. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1995. “Causal Inference in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.” Pp. 1–38 in Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by G. Arminger, C.C. Clogg, and M.E. Sobel. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Terris, M. 1973. “Desegregating Health Statistics.” American Journal of Public Health 63:477–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tucker, W.H. 1994. The Science and Politics of Racial Research. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  21. Udry, J.R. 1986. “The Nature of Gender.” Demography 31:561–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van den Oord, J.C.G. and D.C. Rowe. 2000. “Racial Differences in Birth Health Risk: A Quantitative Genetic Approach.” Demography 37:285–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wachter, K.W. and C.E. Finch, eds. 1997. Between Zeus and the Salmon: The Biodemography of Longevity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Weiss, K.M. 1990. “The Biodemography of Variation in Human Frailty.” Demography 27:185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilkinson, D.Y. and G. King. 1987. “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Use of Race as a Variable: Policy Implications.” Milbank Quarterly 65 (supp. 1):56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, E.O. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  27. Yee, A.H., H.H. Fairchild, F. Weizmann, and G.E. Wyatt. 1993. “Addressing Psychology’s Problems With Race.” American Psychologist 48:1132–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zuberi, T. 2000. “Deracializing Social Statistics: Problems in the Quantification of Race.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 568:172–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. —. 2001. Thicker Than Blood: An Essay on How Racial Statistics Lie. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tukufu Zuberi
    • 1
  1. 1.Population Studies CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations