Increasing longevity and medicare expenditures
- 331 Downloads
Official Medicare projections forecast that the elderly population will be less healthy and more costly over the next century. This prediction stems from the use of age as an indicator of health status: increases in longevity are assumed to increase demand for health care as individuals survive to older and higher-use ages. In this paper I suggest an alternative approach, in which time until death replaces age as the demographic indicator of health status. Increases in longevity are assumed to postpone the higher Medicare use and costs associated with the final decade of life. I contrast the two approaches, using mortality forecasts consistent with recent projections from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Social Security Administration. The time-until-death method yields significantly lower-cost forecasts. The hypothetical cost savings from improved health are small, however, relative to the size of the Medicare solvency problem caused by population aging.
KeywordsGross Domestic Product Baby Boomer Medicare Enrollee Health Care Financing Administration Medicare Cost
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berkeley Mortality Database. Retrieved February 1, 2000 (www.demog.berkeley.edu).Google Scholar
- Board of Trustees, Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund. 2000. 2000 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Board of Trustees, Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. 2000. 2000 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Cutler, D.M. and E. Meara. 1999. “The Concentration of Medical Spending: An Update.” NBER Working Paper 7279, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- — 1984. “The Compression of Morbidity: Miscellaneous Comments About a Theme.” The Gerontologist 24:354–59.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, V.R. 1984. “Though Much Is Taken: Reflections on Aging, Health, and Medical Care.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 62:143–66.Google Scholar
- Garber, A.M., T.E. MaCurdy, and M.L. McClellan. 1998. “Medical Care at the End of Life: Diseases, Treatment Patterns, and Costs.” NBER Working Paper 6748, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Hollmann, F.W., T.J. Mulder, and J.E. Kallan. 2000. “Methodology and Assumptions for the Population Projections of the United States: 1999 to 2100.” Population Division Working Paper 38, Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Lee, R.D. 1994. “Fertility, Mortality, and Intergenerational Transfers: Comparisons Across Steady States.” Pp. 135–57 in The Family, the Market, and the State in Ageing Societies, edited by J. Ermisch and N. Ogawa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lubitz, J. and R. Prihoba. 1984. “The Use of Medicare Services in the Last Two Years of Life.” Health Care Financing Review 5:117–31.Google Scholar
- U.S. Office of Management and the Budget. 2000. Historical Tables, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar