Demography

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 667–687 | Cite as

Gender scripts and age at marriage in India

Article

Abstract

Research on marriage in developing countries has been somewhat narrow in scope because of both conceptual and data limitations. While the feminist literature recognizes marriage as a key institutional site for the production and reproduction of gender hierarchies, little is known about the processes through which this relationship operates. This article uses data from the newly collected India Human Development Survey 2005 for 27,365 ever-married women aged 25–49 to explore ways in which different dimensions of gender in Indian society shape the decisions regarding age at marriage. We explore the impact of three dimensions of gender: (1) economic factors, such as availability of wage employment, dowry expectations, and wedding expenses; (2) indicators of familial empowerment, such as women’s role in household decision making and access to and control over resources; and (3) markers of gender performance, such as observance of purdah and male-female separation in the household. Results from hierarchical linear models confirm the importance of markers of gender performance but fail to demonstrate a large role for economic factors and familial empowerment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, L. 2001. “Redrawing the Lakshman Rekha: Gender Differences and Cultural Constructions in Youth Sexuality in Urban India.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 24: 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwala, R. and S.M. Lynch. 2006. “Refining the Measurement of Women’s Autonomy: An International Application of a Multi-dimensional Construct.” Social Forces 84: 2077–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerji, M., S.P. Martin, and S. Desai. 2008. “Is Education Associated With a Transition Towards Autonomy in Partner Choice? A Case Study of India.” Presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Changing Transitions to Marriage: Gender Implications for the Next Generation, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  4. Basu, A.M. 1993. “Cultural Influences on the Timing of First Births in India: Large Differences That Add up to Little Difference.” Population Studies 47: 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu, A.M. and G.B. Koolwal. 2005. “Two Concepts of Female Empowerment: Some Leads From DHS Data on Women’s Status and Reproductive Health.” Pp. 15–54 in A Focus on Gender: Collected Papers on Gender Using DHS Data, edited by S. Kishor. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G.S. 1993. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bhasin, V. 2007. “Status of Tribal Women in India.” Studies on Home and Community Science 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
  8. Bloch, F., V. Rao, and S. Desai. 2004. “Wedding Celebrations as Conspicuous Consumption: Signaling Social Status in Rural India.” Journal of Human Resources 39: 675–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloom, S.S., D. Wypij, and M. Das Gupta. 2001. “Dimensions of Women’s Autonomy and the Influence on Maternal Health Care Utilization in a North Indian City.” Demography 38: 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blumberg, R.L. 1991. Gender, Family and Economy: The Triple Overlap. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Bollen, K.A. 1989. Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Caldwell, J.C., P. Caldwell, B.K. Caldwell, and I. Pieris. 1998. “The Construction of Adolescence in a Changing World: Implications for Sexuality, Reproduction, and Marriage.” Studies in Family Planning 29: 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldwell, J.C., P.H. Reddy, and P. Caldwell. 1983. “The Causes of Marriage Change in South India.” Population Studies 37: 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, P. 1989. “Colonialism, Nationalism, and Colonialized Women: The Contest in India.” American Ethnologist 16: 622–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, P.H., L.A. Maldonado, D.Y. Takagi, B. Thorne, L. Weber, and H. Winant. 1995. “Symposium on West and Fenstermaker’s ‘Doing Difference.’” Gender and Society 9: 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, R., J.S. Chafetz, R.L. Blumberg, S. Coltrane, and J.H. Turner. 1993. “Toward an Integrated Theory of Gender Stratification.” Sociological Perspectives 36: 185–216.Google Scholar
  17. Croft, T. 2008. “DHS Data Editing and Imputation.” Paper. Macro International, Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
  18. Das, N.P. and D. Dey. 1998. “Female Age at Marriage in India: Trends and Determinants.” Demography India 27: 91–115.Google Scholar
  19. Derne, S. 1994. “Hindu Men Talk About Controlling Women: Cultural Ideas as a Tool of the Powerful.” Sociological Perspectives 37: 203–27.Google Scholar
  20. —. 2003. “Arnold Schwarzenegger, Ally McBeal, and Arranged Marriages: Globalization on the Ground in India.” Contexts 2: 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Desai, S. and M.B. Das. 2004. “Is Employment Driving India’s Growth Surge?” Economic and Political Weekly 39: 345–51.Google Scholar
  22. Desai, S., A. Dubey, B.L. Joshi, M. Sen, A. Shariff, and R. Vanneman. 2009. “India Human Development Survey: Design and Data Quality.” IHDS Technical Paper No. 1. University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  23. Desai, S. and K. Johnson. 2005. “Women’s Decisionmaking and Child Health: Familial and Social Hierarchies.” Pp. 55–68 in A Focus on Gender: Collected Papers on Gender Using DHS Data, edited by S. Kishor. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  24. Dube, L. 1996. “Caste and Women.” Pp. 1–27 in Caste: Its Twentieth Century Avatar, edited by M.N. Srinivas. New Delhi: Penguin Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. —. 2001. Anthropological Explorations in Gender: Intersecting Fields. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Dwyer, D. and J. Bruce. 1988. A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dyson, T. and M. Moore. 1983. “On Kinship Structure, Female Autonomy, and Demographic Behavior in India.” Population and Development Review 9: 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferree, M.M. 1990. “Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 866–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Folbre, N. 2001. The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fricke, T.E., S.H. Syed, and P.C. Smith. 1986. “Rural Punjabi Social Organization and Marriage Timing Strategies in Pakistan.” Demography 23: 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fussell, E. and A. Palloni. 2004. “Persistent Marriage Regimes in Changing Times.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 1201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Germain, A. 1997. “Addressing the Demographic Imperative Through Health, Empowerment, and Rights: ICPD Implementation in Bangladesh.” Health Transition Review 7: 33–36.Google Scholar
  33. Goffman, E. 1976. “Gender Display.” Studies in Anthropology of Visual Communications 3: 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greenhalgh, S. 1985. “Sexual Stratification: The Other Side of ‘Growth With Equity’ in East Asia.” Population and Development Review 11: 265–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heimsath, C.H. 1962. “The Origin and Enactment of the Indian Age of Consent Bill, 189.” Journal of Asian Studies 21: 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hirschman, C. 1985. “Premarital Socioeconomic Roles and the Timing of Family Formation: A Comparative Study of Five Asian Societies.” Demography 22: 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), and Macro International. 2007. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) 2005–06, India: Volume 1. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  38. Jejeebhoy, J.S. and A.Z. Sathar. 2001. “Women’s Autonomy in India and Pakistan: The Influence of Religion and Region.” Population and Development Review 27: 687–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kabeer, N. 1999. “The Conditions and Consequences of Choice: Reflections on Measurement of Women’s Empowerment.” UNRISD Discussion Paper No. 108. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.Google Scholar
  40. Kannabiran, V. and K. Lalitha. 1989. “That Magic Time: Women in the Telangana People’s Struggle.” Pp. 180–203 in Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History, edited by K. Sangari and S. Vaid. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kapadia, K. 1995. Siva and Her Sisters: Gender, Class and Caste in Rural South India. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kaufman, J. 2004. “Endogenous Explanation in the Sociology of Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaur, R. 2004. “Across-Region Marriages: Poverty, Female Migration and the Sex Ratio.” Economic and Political Weekly 39: 2595–603.Google Scholar
  44. Kishor, S. 1993. “‘May God Give Sons to All’: Gender and Child Mortality in India.” American Sociological Review 58: 247–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. —. 2000. “Empowerment of Women in Egypt and Links to the Survival and Health of Their Children.” Pp. 119–56 in Women’s Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving Beyond Cairo, edited by H. Presser and G. Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. —. 2005. “Gender in the Demographic and Health Surveys.” Pp. 1–7 in A Focus on Gender: Collected Papers on Gender Using DHS Data, edited by S. Kishor. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  47. Leonard, K. 1976. “Women and Social Change in Modern India.” Feminist Studies 3: 117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lesthaeghe, R. and J. Surkyn. 1988. “Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change.” Population and Development Review 14: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liddle, J. and R. Joshi. 1989. Daughters of Independence: Gender, Caste and Class in India. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Liechty, M. 2003. Suitably Modern: Making Middle-Class Culture in a New Consumer Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lindenbaum, S. 1981. “Implications for Women of Changing Marriage Transactions in Bangladesh.” Studies in Family Planning 12: 394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lloyd, C., ed. 2005. Growing Up Global: The Changing Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Panel on Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries.Google Scholar
  53. Malhotra, A., S.R. Schuler, and C. Boender. 2002. “Measuring Women’s Empowerment as a Variable in International Development.” Background paper prepared for the World Bank workshop “Poverty and Gender: New Perspectives.” World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  54. Malhotra, A. and A.O. Tsui. 1996. “Marriage Timing in Sri Lanka: The Role of Modern Norms and Ideas.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58: 476–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Malhotra, A., R. Vanneman, and S. Kishor. 1995. “Fertility, Dimensions of Patriarchy, and Development in India.” Population and Development Review 21: 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mason, K.O. 1986. “The Status of Women: Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Demographic Studies.” Sociological Forum 1: 284–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. —. 1995. Gender and Demographic Change: What Do We Know? Liege: International Union for Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  58. Mendelbaum, D. 1988. Women’s Seclusion and Men’s Honor: Sex Roles in India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  59. Mensch, B., S. Singh, and J. Casterline. 2005. “Trends in the Timing of First Marriage Among Men and Women in the Developing World.” Pp. 118–71 in The Changing Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries: Selected Studies, edited by C.B. Lloyd, J. Behrman, N.P. Stromquist, and B. Cohen. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  60. Morgan, S.P., S. Stash, H.L. Smith, and K.O. Mason. 2002. “Muslim and Non-Muslim Differences in Female Autonomy and Fertility: Evidence From Four Asian Countries.” Population and Development Review 28: 515–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mukhopadhyay, C.C. and P.J. Higgins. 1988. “Anthropological Studies of Women’s Status Revisited: 1977–1987.” Annual Review of Anthropology 17: 461–95.Google Scholar
  62. Murthi, M., A.-C. Guio, and J. Dreze. 1995. “Mortality, Fertility, and Gender Bias in India: A District-Level Analysis.” Population and Development Review 21: 745–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Narayan, D., ed. 2006. Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. National Sample Survey Organisation. 2001. “Migration in India, 1999–2000.” New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.Google Scholar
  65. Niraula, B.B. and S.P. Morgan. 1996. “Marriage Formation, Post-Marital Contact With Natal Kin and Autonomy of Women: Evidence From Two Nepali Settings.” Population Studies 50: 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Omvedt, G. 2006. Dalit Visions: The Anti-Caste Movement and the Construction of an Indian Identity. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
  67. Oppenheimer, V.K. 1988. “A Theory of Marriage Timing.” American Journal of Sociology 94: 563–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Papanek, H. 1973. “Purdah: Separate Worlds and Symbolic Shelter.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 15: 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Presser, H.B. 1997. “Demography, Feminism, and the Science-Policy Nexus.” Population and Development Review 23: 295–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Presser, H.B. and G. Sen. 2000. Women’s Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving Beyond Cairo. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Raheja, G. Goodwin, and A.Grodzins Gold. 1994. Listen to the Heron’s Words: Reimagining Gender and Kinship in North India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  72. Rao, A. 2003. Gender and Caste: Issues in Contemporary Indian Feminism. New Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
  73. Retherford, R.D., N. Ogawa, and R. Matsukura. 2001. “Late Marriage and Less Marriage in Japan.” Population and Development Review 27: 65–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Riley, N.E. 1997. “Gender, Power and Population Change.” Population Bulletin 52.Google Scholar
  75. Santhya, K.G. and S.J. Jejeebhoy. 2007. Young People’s Sexual and Reproductive Health in India: Policies, Programmes and Realities. New Delhi: Population Council.Google Scholar
  76. Schein, L. 1999. “Performing Modernity.” Cultural Anthropology 14: 361–95. Schlegel, A. 1993. “Dowry: Who Competes for What?” American Anthropologist 95:155-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schultz, T.W., ed. 1974. Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  78. Singh, J.P. 2005. The Contemporary Indian Family. Pp. 129–66 in Handbook of World Families, edited by B.N. Adams and J. Trost. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  79. Srinivas, M.N. 1977. “The Changing Position of Indian Women.” Man 12: 221–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Srinivasan, P. and G.R. Lee. 2004. “The Dowry System in Northern India: Women’s Attitudes and Social Change.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 1108–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Swidler, A. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51: 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thompson, L. and A.J. Walker. 1995. “The Place of Feminism in Family Studies.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 57: 847–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thornton, A. and T.E. Fricke. 1987. “Social Change and the Family: Comparative Perspectives From the West, China, and South Asia.” Sociological Forum 2: 746–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Uberoi, P. 1993. Family, Kinship and Marriage in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Watkins, S.C. 1993. “If All We Knew About Women Was What We Read in Demography, What Would We Know?” Demography 30: 551–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. West, C. and D.H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender and Society 1: 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wolf, D.L. 1994. Factory Daughters: Gender, Household Dynamics, and Rural Industrialization in Java. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  88. World Bank. 2004. “Attaining the Millennium Development Goals in India: How Likely and What Will It Take to Reduce Infant Mortality, Child Malnutrition, Gender Disparities and Hunger-Poverty to Increase School Enrollment and Completion?” Human Development Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege Park
  2. 2.National Council for Applied Economic ResearchNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations