Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 439–458 | Cite as

Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: The impact of expected earnings, gender composition, and family attitudes

  • Jan Van BavelEmail author
Article

Abstract

Theory suggests that the field of study may be at least as consequential for fertility behavior as the duration and level of education. Yet, this qualitative dimension of educational achievement has been largely neglected in demographic studies. This article analyzes the mechanisms relating the field of study with the postponement of motherhood by European college-graduate women aged 20–40. The second round of the European Social Survey is used to assess the impact of four features of study disciplines that are identified as key to reproductive decision making: the expected starting wage, the steepness of the earning profile, attitudes toward gendered family roles, and gender composition. The results indicate that the postponement of motherhood is relatively limited among graduates from study disciplines in which stereotypical attitudes about family roles prevail and in which a large share of the graduates are female. Both the level of the starting wage and the steepness of the earning profile are found to be associated with greater postponement. These results are robust to controlling for the partnership situation and the age at entry into the labor market.

Keywords

Labor Market Educational Attainment Family Formation Gender Composition European Social Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baizán, P., A. Aassve, and F.C. Billari. 2003. “Cohabitation, Marriage, and First Birth: The Interrelationship of Family Formation Events in Spain.” European Journal of Population 19: 147–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, D. and D. Sarkar. 2006. Lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R Package Version 0.995-2.Google Scholar
  4. Billari, F.C. and D. Philipov. 2004. “Education and the Transition to Motherhood: A Comparative Analysis of Western Europe.” European Demographic Research Papers 2004-3. Vienna Institute of Demography of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  5. Blossfeld, H.-P. 1995. “Changes in the Process of Family Formation and Women’s Growing Economic Independence: A Comparison of Nine Countries.” Pp. 3–34 The New Role of Women-Family Formation in Modern Societies, edited by H.-P. Blossfeld. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blossfeld, H.-P. and J. Huinink. 1991. “Human Capital Investments or Norms of Role Transition? How Women’s Schooling and Career Affect the Process of Family Formation.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brien, M.J., L.A. Lillard, and L.J. Waite. 1999. “Interrelated Family-Building Behaviors: Cohabitation, Marriage, and Nonmarital Conception.” Demography 36: 535–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, C. and M. Corcoran. 1997. “Sex-Based Differences in School Content and the Male-Female Wage Gap.” Journal of Labor Economics 15: 431–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Courgeau, D. and E. Lelièvre. 1992. Event History Analysis in Demography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat. 2007. Europe in Figures. Eurostat Yearbook 2006–07. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  11. Gustafsson, S. 2001. “Optimal Age at Motherhood. Theoretical and Empirical Considerations on Postponement of Maternity in Europe.” Journal of Population Economics 14: 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —. 2005. “Having Kids Later. Economic Analyses for Industrialized Countries.” Review of Economics of the Household 3: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gustafsson, S. and S. Worku. 2005. “Assortative Mating by Education and Postponement of Couple Formation and First Birth in Britain and Sweden.” Review of Economics of the Household 3: 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Häder, S. and P. Lynn. 2007. “How Representative Can a Multi-Nation Survey Be?” Pp. 33–52 in Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally. Lessons From the European Social Survey, edited by R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, and G. Eva. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Hakim, C. 2000. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hank, K. 2002. “Regional Social Contexts and Individual Fertility Decisions: A Multilevel Analysis of First and Second Births in Western Germany.” European Journal of Population 18: 281–99.Google Scholar
  17. Hoem, J. 1986. “The Impact of Education on Modern Family-Union Initiation.” European Journal of Population 2: 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoem, J.M., G. Neyer, and G. Andersson. 2006a. “Education and Childlessness. The Relationship Between Educational Field, Educational Level, and Childlessness Among Swedish Women Born in 1955–59.” Demographic Research 14, Article 15: 331–80. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes /Vol14/15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —. 2006b. “Educational Attainment and Ultimate Fertility Among Swedish Women Born in 1955–59.” Demographic Research 14, Article 16: 381–404. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol 14/16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jansen, M. and M. Kalmijn. 2000. “Emancipatiewaarden en de levensloop van jong-volwassen vrouwen: een padanalyse van wederzijdse invloeden” [Emancipatory values and the life courses of young adult women: A path analysis of mutual influences]. Sociologische Gids 47: 293–314.Google Scholar
  21. Jowell, R. and the Central Co-ordinating Team. 2005. “European Social Survey 2004/2005: Technical Report.” Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University, London.Google Scholar
  22. Jowell, R., C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, and G. Eva, eds. 2007. Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally: Lessons From the European Social Survey. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Jurajda, S. 2003. “Gender Wage Gap and Segregation in Enterprises and the Public Sector in Late Transition Countries.” Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalmijn, M. 1996. “Effecten van opleidingsniveau, duur en richting op het tijdstip waarop paren hun eerste kind krijgen” [Effects of educational level, school enrollment and type of schooling on the timing of the first birth]. Bevolking en Gezin 1996: 41–71.Google Scholar
  25. Kline, R.B. 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kravdal, Ø. 1994. “The Importance of Economic Activity, Economic Potential and Economic Resources For the Timing of First Births in Norway.” Population Studies 48: 249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. -. 2004. “An Illustration of the Problems Caused by Incomplete Education Histories in Fertility Analyses.” Demographic Research Special Collection 3, Article 6:133–54. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/3/6.Google Scholar
  28. Lappegård, T. 2002. “Educational Attainment and Fertility Patterns Among Norwegian Mothers.” Document 2002/18. Statistics Norway, Oslo.Google Scholar
  29. Lappegård, T. and M. Rønsen. 2005. “The Multifaceted Impact of Education on Entry Into Motherhood.” European Journal of Population 21: 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liefbroer, A.C. and M. Corijn. 1999. “Who, What, Where, and When? Specifying the Impact of Educational Attainment and Labour Force Participation on Family Formation.” European Journal of Population 15: 45–75.Google Scholar
  31. Lillard, L.A. 1993. “Simultaneous Equations for Hazards: Marriage Durations and Fertility Timing.” Journal of Econometrics 56: 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lillard, L.A. and L.J. Waite. 1993. “A Joint Model of Marital Childbearing and Marital Disruption.” Demography 30: 653–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Machin, S. and P.A. Puhani. 2003. “Subject of Degree and the Gender Wage Differential: Evidence From the UK and Germany.” Economics Letters 79: 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mandel, H. and M. Semyonov. 2006. “A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 111: 1910–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marini, M.M. 1984. “Women’s Educational Attainment and the Timing of Entry Into Parenthood.” American Sociological Review 49: 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, S.P. 2000. “Diverging Fertility Among U.S. Women Who Delay Childbearing Past Age 30.” Demography 37: 523–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martín-García, T. and P. Baizán. 2006. “The Impact of the Type of Education and of Educational Enrolment on First Births.” European Sociological Review 22: 259–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moors, G. 1997. “The Dynamics of Values-Based Selection and Values Adaptation.” Doctoral dissertation. Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Centrum voor Sociologie, Brussels.Google Scholar
  39. Morgan, S.P. and L.J. Waite. 1987. “Parenthood and the Attitudes of Young Adults.” American Sociological Review 52: 541–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neyer, G. and J. Hoem. 2008. “Education and Permanent Childlessness: Austria vs. Sweden. A Research Note.” Pp. 91–112 in Demographic Challenges for the 21st Century. A State of the Art in Demography. (Liber Amicorum Ron Lesthaeghe), edited by J. Surkyn, P. Deboosere, and J. Van Bavel. Brussels: VUB/Academia Press.Google Scholar
  41. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  42. Rindfuss, R.R., K.B. Guzzo, and S.P. Morgan. 2003. “The Changing Institutional Context of Low Fertility.” Population Research and Policy Review 22: 411–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rindfuss, R.R., S.P. Morgan, and K. Offutt. 1996. “Education and the Changing Age Patterns of American Fertility: 1963–1989.” Demography 33: 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rindfuss, R.R., S.P. Morgan, and G. Swicegood. 1988. First Births in America: Changes in the Timing of Parenthood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Singer, J.D. and J.B. Willett. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Skirbekk, V., H.-P. Kohler, and A. Prskawetz. 2004. “Birth Month, School Graduation, and the Timing of Births and Marriages.” Demography 41: 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sobotka, T. 2004. Postponement of Childbearing and Low Fertility in Europe. Groningen and Amsterdam: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen and Dutch University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interface DemographyVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations