Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 765–783 | Cite as

The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course

  • Sarah R. Hayford
Article

Abstract

In low-fertility contexts, how many children people have is largely a product of how many children they want. However, the social, institutional, and individual factors that influence how many children people want are not well understood. In particular, there is scant evidence about how fertility expectations change over the life course. This article provides an empirical description of changes in women's expected fertility over the entire span of childbearing years. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1979 cohort, group-based trajectory analysis illuminates common patterns in the evolution of fertility intentions and identifies individual characteristics associated with these patterns. Factors related to family formation, such as marriage and whether a woman has a child at an early age, are found to be the most consistent correlates of patterns of change in expected family size.

Keywords

Family Size African American Woman Hispanic Woman Trajectory Group Fertility Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abma, J.C. and G.M. Martinez. 2006. “Childlessness Among Older Women in the United States: Trends and Profiles.” Journal of Marriage and Family 68:1045–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, J.S. 2001. “Ideational Influences on the Transition to Parenthood: Attitudes Toward Childbearing and Competing Alternatives.” Social Psychology Quarterly 64:101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bean, F.D. and M. Tienda. 1987. The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Bongaarts, J. 1992. “Do Reproductive Intentions Matter?” International Family Planning Perspectives 18:102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. — 2001. “Fertility and Reproductive Preferences in Post-Transitional Societies.” Population and Development Review 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition):260–81.Google Scholar
  7. —. 2002. “The End of the Fertility Transition in the Developed World.” Population and Development Review 28:419–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browning, C.R. and L.A. Burrington. 2006. “Racial Differences in Sexual and Fertility Attitudes in an Urban Setting.” Journal of Marriage and Family 68:236–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caldwell, J.C. and T. Schindlmayr. 2003. “Explanations of the Fertility Crisis in Modern Societies: A Search for Commonalities.” Population Studies 57:241–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandra, A., G.M. Martinez, W.D. Mosher, J.C. Abma, and J. Jones. 2005. “Fertility, Family Planning and Reproductive Health of U.S. Women: Data From the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.” Vital Health Statistics Series 23(25). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  11. Coale, A.J. 1973. “The Demographic Transition.” Pp. 53–72 in International Population Conference, Liège. Liège, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  12. D'Unger, A.V., K.C. Land, P.L. McCall, and D.S. Nagin. 1998. “How Many Latent Classes of Delinquent/Criminal Careers? Results From Mixed Poisson Regression Analyses.” American Journal of Sociology 103:1593–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dye, J. Lawler. 2005. “Fertility of American Women: June 2004.” Current Population Reports P20-5555. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  14. Edin, K. and M. Kefalas. 2005. Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ellwood, D.T. and C. Jencks. 2004. “The Uneven Spread of Single Parent Families: What Do We Know? Where Do We Look for Answers?” Pp. 3–77 in Social Inequality, edited by K.M. Neckerman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Fey, T. and J. Fallon. 2002. “Weekend Update.” Saturday Night Live, NBC, May 18.Google Scholar
  17. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Forste, R. and M. Tienda. 1996. “What's Behind Racial and Ethnic Fertility Differentials?” Population and Development Review 22(Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories):109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freedman, R., D.S. Freedman, and A. Thornton. 1980. “Changes in Fertility Expectations and Preferences Between 1962 and 1977: Their Relation to Final Parity.” Demography 17:365–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman, D., M. Hechter, and S. Kanazawa. 1994. “A Theory of the Value of Children.” Demography 31:375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geronimus, A.T. and S. Korenman. 1992. “The Socioeconomic Consequences of Teen Childbearing Reconsidered.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:1187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. —. 1993. “The Socioeconomic Costs of Teenage Childbearing: Evidence and Interpretation.” Demography 30:281–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldstein, J.R., W. Lutz, and M. Rita Testa. 2003. “The Emergence of Sub-Replacement Family Size Ideals in Europe.” Population Research and Policy Review 22:479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grigoriadis, V. 2002. “Baby Talk.” New York Magazine, May 20.Google Scholar
  25. Hagewen, K.J. and S.P. Morgan. 2005. “Intended and Ideal Family Size in the United States, 1970–2002.” Population and Development Review 31:507–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamil-Luker, J., K.C. Land, and J. Blau. 2004. “Diverse Trajectories of Cocaine Use Through Early Adulthood Among Rebellious and Socially Conforming Youth.” Social Science Research 33:300–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayford, S.R. and S.P. Morgan. 2008. “Religiosity and Fertility in the United States: The Role of Fertility Intentions.” Social Forces 86:1163–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heaton, T.B., C.K. Jacobson, and K. Holland. 1999. “Persistence and Change in Decisions to Remain Childless.” Journal of Marriage and Family 61:531–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hewlett, S.A. 2002. Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest for Children. New York: Talk Miramax Books.Google Scholar
  30. Hoffman, S.D., E.M. Foster, and F.F. Furstenberg, Jr. 1993a. “Reevaluating the Costs of Teenage Childbearing.” Demography 30:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. —. 1993b. “Reevaluating the Costs of Teenage Childbearing: Response to Geronimus and Korenman.” Demography 30: 291–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hynes, K. and M. Clarkberg. 2005. “Women's Employment Patterns During Early Parenthood: A Group-Based Trajectory Analysis.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67:222–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobson, C.K. and T.B. Heaton. 1991. “Voluntary Childlessness Among American Men and Women in the Late 1980s.” Social Biology 38(1–2):79–93.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, B.L., D.S. Nagin, and K. Roeder. 2001. “A SAS Procedure Based on Mixture Models for Estimating Developmental Trajectories.” Sociological Methods and Research 29:374–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaufman, G. 2000. “Do Gender Role Attitudes Matter? Family Formation and Dissolution Among Traditional and Egalitarian Men and Women.” Journal of Family Issues 21:128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohler, H.-P., F.C. Billari, and J.A. Ortega. 2002. “The Emergence of Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s.” Population and Development Review 28:641–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Land, K.C., D.S. Nagin, and P.L. McCall. 2001. “Discrete-Time Hazard Regression Models With Hidden Heterogeneity: The Semiparametric Mixed Poisson Regression Approach.” Sociological Methods and Research 29:342–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lareau, A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, J.A., B.E. Hamilton, P.D. Sutton, S.J. Ventura, F. Menacker, and M.L. Munson. 2003. “Births: Final Data for 2002.” National Vital Statistics Reports 52(10). National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
  40. Martin, S.P. 2004. “Delayed Marriage and Childbearing: Implications and Measurement of Diverging Trends in Family Timing.” Pp. 79–118 in Social Inequality, edited by K.M. Neckerman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. McDonald, P. 2000. “Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Decline.” Population and Development Review 26:427–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McLanahan, S. 2004. “Diverging Destinies: How Children Are Faring Under the Second Demographic Transition.” Demography 41:607–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menken, J. 1985. “Age and Fertility: How Late Can You Wait?” Demography 22:469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Monnier, A. 1989. “Fertility Intentions and Actual Behaviour. A Longitudinal Study: 1974, 1976, 1979.” Population: An English Selection 44:237–59.Google Scholar
  45. Morgan, S.P. 1996. “Characteristic Features of Modern American Fertility: A Description of Late Twentieth-Century U.S. Fertility Trends and Differentials.” Population and Development Review 22(Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories):1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. —. 2001. “Should Fertility Intentions Inform Fertility Forecasts? The Direction of Fertility in the United States.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  47. Morgan, S.P. and R.R. Rindfuss. 1999. “Reexamining the Link of Early Childbearing to Marriage and to Subsequent Fertility.” Demography 36:59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morgan, S.P. and M.G. Taylor. 2006. “Low Fertility at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century.” Annual Review of Sociology 32:375–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Musick, K. and R.D. Mare. 2004. “Family Structure, Intergenerational Mobility, and the Reproduction of Poverty: Evidence for Increasing Polarization?” Demography 41:629–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Muthén, B.O. 2004. “Latent Variable Analysis: Growth Mixture Modeling and Related Techniques for Longitudinal Data.” Pp. 345–68 in SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, edited by D. Kaplan. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Nagin, D.S. 1999. “Analyzing Developmental Trajectories: A Semiparametric, Group-Based Approach.” Psychological Methods 4:139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. — 2005. Group-Based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Namboodiri, N.K. 1972. “Some Observations on the Economic Framework for Fertility Analysis.” Population Studies 26:185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O'Connell, M. and C.C. Rogers. 1983. “Assessing Cohort Birth Expectations Data From the Current Population Survey, 1971–1981.” Demography 20:369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park, K. 2005. “Choosing Childlessness: Weber's Typology of Action and Motives of the Voluntarily Childless.” Sociological Inquiry 75:372–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pearce, L.D. 2002. “The Infiuence of Early Life Course Religious Exposure on Young Adult's Dispositions Toward Childbearing.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41:325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pearson, A. 2002. I Don't Know How She Does It: The Life of Kate Reddy, Working Mother. New York, London: Knopf.Google Scholar
  58. Quesnel-Vallée, A. and S.P. Morgan. 2003. “Missing the Target? Correspondence of Fertility Intentions and Behavior in the U.S.” Population Research and Policy Review 22(5–6):497–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Remez, L. 2000. “Degree of Certainty About Plans to Have Children Strongly Predicts Whether Individuals Will Do So.” Family Planning Perspectives 32:46–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rindfuss, R.R. and K.L. Brewster. 1996. “Childrearing and Fertility.” Population and Development Review 22(Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories):258–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rindfuss, R.R., K. Benjamin Guzzo, and S.P. Morgan. 2003. “The Changing Institutional Context of Low Fertility.” Population Research and Policy Review 22:411–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rindfuss, R.R., S.P. Morgan, and K. Offutt. 1996. “Education and the Changing Age Pattern of American Fertility: 1963–1989.” Demography 33:277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rindfuss, R.R., S.P. Morgan, and C.G. Swicegood. 1988. First Births in America: Changes in the Timing of Parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  64. Rindfuss, R.R. and A.M. Parnell. 1989. “The Varying Connection Between Marital Status and Childbearing in the United States.” Population and Development Review 15:447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rovi, S.L.D. 1994. “Taking NO for an Answer: Using Negative Reproductive Intentions to Study the Childless/Childfree.” Population Research and Policy Review 13:343–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ryder, N.B. and C.F. Westoff. 1971. Reproduction in the United States: 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Schoen, R., N.M. Astone, Y.J. Kim, C.A. Nathanson, and J. Fields. 1999. “Do Fertility Intentions Affect Fertility Behavior?” Journal of Marriage and Family 61:790–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schoen, R., Y.J. Kim, C.A. Nathanson, J. Fields, and N.M. Astone. 1997. “Why Do Americans Want Children?” Population and Development Review 23:333–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shkolnikov, V.M., E.M. Andreev, R. Houle, and J.W. Vaupel. 2007. “The Concentration of Reproduction in Cohorts of Women in Europe and the United States.” Population and Development Review 33:67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. South, S.J. and E.P. Baumer. 2000. “Deciphering Community and Race Effects on Adolescent Premarital Childbearing.” Social Forces 78:1379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sullivan, R. 2005. “The Age Pattern of First-Birth Rates Among U.S. Women: The Bimodal 1990s.” Demography 42:259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomson, E. 1997. “Couple Childbearing Desires, Intentions, and Births.” Demography 34:343–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thornton, A. and L. Young-DeMarco. 2001. “Four Decades of Trends in Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States: The 1960s Through the 1990s.” Journal of Marriage and Family 63:1009–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Trent, K. and K. Crowder. 1997. “Adolescent Birth Intentions, Social Disadvantage, and Behavioral Outcomes.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 59:523–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Udry, J.R. 1983. “Do Couples Make Fertility Plans One Birth at a Time?” Demography 20:117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wagmiller, R.L. Jr., M.C. Lennon, L. Kuang, P.M. Alberti, and J.L. Aber. 2006. “The Dynamics of Economic Disadvantage and Children's Life Chances.” American Sociological Review 71:847–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Warner, J. 2005. Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety. New York: Riverhead Hardcover.Google Scholar
  78. Weiner, J. 2005. Goodnight Nobody: A Novel. New York: Atria.Google Scholar
  79. Westoff, C.F. and N.B. Ryder. 1977. “The Predictive Validity of Reproductive Intentions.” Demography 14:431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams, L., J.C. Abma, and L.J. Piccinino. 1999. “The Correspondence Between Intention to Avoid Childbearing and Subsequent Fertility: A Prospective Analysis.” Family Planning Perspectives 31:220–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yang, Y. and S.P. Morgan. 2003. “How Big Are Educational and Racial Fertility Differentials in the U.S.?” Social Biology 50(3–4):167–87.Google Scholar
  82. Zabin, L.S. 1999. “Ambivalent Feelings About Parenthood May Lead to Inconsistent Contraceptive Use and Pregnancy.” Family Planning Perspectives 31:250–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah R. Hayford
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social and Family DynamicsArizona State UniversityTempe

Personalised recommendations