Revisiting das gupta: Refinement and extension of standardization and decomposition
- 157 Downloads
Standardization and decomposition are established and widely used demographic techniques for comparing rates and means between groups with differences in composition. The difference in rates and means has heretofore been resolved in terms of the contribution of variables to compositional effects for each variable and an overall rate effect. This study demonstrates that the resolution of differences is attainable at the categorical level for both compositional effects and rate effects. Refinements to Das Gupta’s equations yield a complete decomposition because of the additivity of categorical compositional and rate effects. Other refinements allow the decomposition of polytomous variables. Extensions to the method provide for the decomposition of the standard deviation and the multivariate index of dissimilarity.
KeywordsRate Effect Compositional Effect Labor Force Participation Rate Composition Effect Crude Rate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Canudas-Romo, V. 2003. Decomposition Methods in Demography. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.Google Scholar
- Cho, L. and R.D. Retherford. 1973. “Comparative Analysis of Recent Fertility Trends in East Asia.” Pp. 163–81 in Proceedings of the 17th General Conference of the IUSSP August 1973, Vol. 2, edited by the International Union for the Scienti c Study of Population. Liege, Belgium: International Union for the Scienti c Study of Population.Google Scholar
- — 1993. “Standardization and Decomposition of Rates: A User’s Manual.” Current Population Reports Series P-23, No. 186. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- — 1994. “Standardization and Decomposition of Rates From Cross-Classi ed Data.” Genus 3:171–96.Google Scholar
- Durand, J.D. 1948. The Labor Force in the United States. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A.J. 1951. Handbook of Statistical Methods for Demographers. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Lichter, D.T. and J.A. Costanzo. 1987. “How Do Demographic Changes Affect Labor Force Participation of Women?” Monthly Labor Review 110:23–25.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1984. “Detailed Occupation of the Experienced Civilian Labor Force by Sex for the United States and Regions: 1980 and 1970.” 1980 Census of the Population, Supplementary Report PC80-S1-15. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Vaupel, J.W. and V. Canudas-Romo. 2002. “Decomposing Demographic Change Into Direct Versus Compositional Components.” Demographic Research, Vol. 7, Article 1:1-14. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol7/1/7-1.pdf.Google Scholar