Dual citizenship rights: do they make more and richer citizens?
- 284 Downloads
In the 1990s, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Costa Rica, and Brazil passed dual citizenship laws granting their expatriates the right to naturalize in the receiving country without losing their nationality of origin. I estimate the effects of these new laws on naturalization rates and labor market outcomes in the United States. Based on data from the 1990 and 2000 U.S. censuses, In find that immigrants recently granted dual nationality rights are more likely to naturalize relative to immigrants from other Latin American countries. They also experience relative employment and earnings gains, together with drops in welfare use, suggesting that dual citizenship rights not only increase the propensity to naturalize but may also promote economic assimilation. The effects of dual citizenship on improved economic performance, if mediated through naturalization, are consistent with American citizenship conferring greater economic opportunities.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baker, B. 2007. “Trends in Naturalization Rates.” Fact Sheet, December 2007. Office of Immigration Statistics, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.Google Scholar
- —. 2006a. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Borjas, G.J. 1999. “The Economic Analysis of Immigration.” Pp. 1697–760 in Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by O. Ashenfelter and D. Card. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Bueker, C.S. 2006. From Immigrant to Naturalized Citizen. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
- Costanzo, J., C. Davis, C. Irazi, D. Goodkind, and R. Ramirez. 2001. “Evaluating Components of International Migration: The Residual Foreign Born.” Population Division Working Paper Series No. 61. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- DeSipio, L. 1996a. Counting on the Latino Vote: Latinos as a New Electorate. Charlottesville, VA: The University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
- Fix, M.E., J.S. Passel, and K. Sucher. 2003. “Trends in Naturalization.” Immigration Studies Program Brief. No. 3. The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Kaushal, N. 2006. “Amnesty Programs and the Labor Market Outcomes of Undocumented Workers.” Journal of Human Resources 61:631–47.Google Scholar
- Passel, J.S. and R. Clark. 1997. “How Many Naturalized Citizens Are There? An Assessment of Data Quality in the Decennial Census and CPS.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC, March 27-29.Google Scholar
- Portes, A. and R.G. Rumbaut. 2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Ramakrishnan, S.K. 2005. Democracy in Immigrant America: Changing Demographics and Political Participation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Robinson, J.G. 2001. “ESCAP II: Demographic Analysis Results.” Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report No. 1: U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Ruggles, S., M. Sobek, T. Alexander, C.A. Fitch, R. Goeken, P.K. Hall, M. King, and C. Ronnander. 2004. “Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 3.0.” Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Population Center.Google Scholar
- U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1997. 1996 Statistical Yearbook, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 2003. “Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: 1990 to 2000.” Available online at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications /Ill_Report_1211.pdf.Google Scholar
- Warren, R. 1995. “Estimates of the Undocumented Immigrant Population Residing in the United States by Country of Origin and State of Residence: October 1992.” Unpublished document. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service.Google Scholar
- Zimmermann, W. and K.C. Tumlin. 1999. “Patchwork Policies: State Assistance for Immigrants Under Welfare Reform.” Occasional Paper 24. The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar