, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 489–514 | Cite as

The geographic scale of Metropolitan racial segregation

  • Sean F. Reardon
  • Stephen A. Matthews
  • David O’Sullivan
  • Barrett A. Lee
  • Glenn Firebaugh
  • Chad R. Farrell
  • Kendra Bischoff


This article addresses an aspect of racial residential segregation that has been largely ignored in prior work: the issue of geographic scale. In some metropolitan areas, racial groups are segregated over large regions, with predominately white regions, predominately black regions, and so on, whereas in other areas, the separation of racial groups occurs over much shorter distances. Here we develop an approach—featuring the segregation profile and the corresponding macro/micro segregation ratio—that offers a scale-sensitive alternative to standard methodological practice for describing segregation. Using this approach, we measure and describe the geographic scale of racial segregation in the 40 largest U.S. metropolitan areas in 2000. We find considerable heterogeneity in the geographic scale of segregation patterns across both metropolitan areas and racial groups, a heterogeneity that is not evident using conventional “aspatial” segregation measures. Moreover, because the geographic scale of segregation is only modestly correlated with the level of segregation in our sample, we argue that geographic scale represents a distinct dimension of residential segregation. We conclude with a brief discussion of the implications of our findings for investigating the patterns, causes, and consequences of residential segregation at different geographic scales.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Charles, C.Z. 2003. “The Dynamics of Racial Residential Segregation.” Annual Review of Sociology 29:167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Environmental Systems Research Institute. 2005. ArcGIS: Release 9.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Farley, R. and W.H. Frey. 1994. “Changes in the Segregation of Whites From Blacks During the 1980s: Small Steps Toward a More Integrated Society.” American Sociological Review 59:23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fischer, C.S., G. Stockmayer, J. Stiles, and M. Hout. 2004. “Distinguishing the Geographic Levels and Social Dimensions of U.S. Metropolitan Segregation, 1960–2000.” Demography 41:37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. GeoLytics. 2003. Census 2000 Short Form Blocks. East Brunswick, NJ: GeoLytics, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Grannis, R. 1998. “The Importance of Trivial Streets: Residential Streets and Residential Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology 103:1530–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. — 2002. “Discussion: Segregation Indices and Their Functional Inputs.” Sociological Methodology 32:69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu, P.S. and T.R. Reuscher. 2004. “Summary of Travel Trends: 2001 National Household Travel Survey.” Report. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. Iceland, J., D. Weinberg, and E. Steinmetz. 2002. “Racial and Ethnic Segregation in the United States: 1980–2000.” Census 2000 Special Report. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Jargowsky, P.A. and J. Kim. 2005. “A Measure of Spatial Segregation: The Generalized Neighborhood Sorting Index.” Working Paper No. 05-03. National Poverty Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  11. Kaplan, D.H. and S.R. Holloway. 2001. “Scaling Ethnic Segregation: Causal Processes and Contingent Outcomes in Chinese Residential Patterns.” GeoJournal 53:59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krysan, M. and R. Farley. 2002. “The Residential Preferences of Blacks: Do They Explain Persistent Segregation?” Social Forces 80:937–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, B.A., S.F. Reardon, G. Firebaugh, C.R. Farrell, S.A. Matthews, and D. O’Sullivan. Forthcoming. “Beyond the Census Tract: Patterns and Determinants of Racial Residential Segregation at Multiple Geographic Scales.” American Sociological Review.Google Scholar
  14. Logan, J.R., B.J. Stults, and R. Farley. 2004. “Segregation of Minorities in the Metropolis: Two Decades of Change.” Demography 41:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Massey, D. S. and N.A. Denton. 1987. “Trends in the Residential Segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970–1980.” American Sociological Review 52:802–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. —. 1988. “The Dimensions of Residential Segregation.” Social Forces 67:281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Massey, D.S. and M.J. Fischer. 2003. “The Geography of Inequality in the United States, 1950–2000.” Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2003(4):1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Massey, D.S. and Z.L. Hajnal. 1995. “The Changing Geographic Structure of Black-White Segregation in the United States.” Social Science Quarterly 76:527–42.Google Scholar
  20. Morrill, R.L. 1991. “On the Measure of Spatial Segregation.” Geography Research Forum 11:25–36.Google Scholar
  21. National Center for Transit Research. 2005. “Public Transit in America: Results From the 2001 National Household Travel Survey.” Report No. FDOT BC137-48; NCTR 527-09. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa.Google Scholar
  22. Pielou, E.C. 1977. Mathematical Ecology, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Reardon, S.F. and G. Firebaugh. 2002. “Measures of Multi-group Segregation.” Sociological Methodology 32:33–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reardon, S.F. and D. O’Sullivan. 2004. “Measures of Spatial Segregation.” Sociological Methodology 34:121–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reardon, S.F., J.T. Yun, and T.M. Eitle. 2000. “The Changing Structure of School Segregation: Measurement and Evidence of Multi-Racial Metropolitan Area School Segregation, 1989–1995.” Demography 37:351–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sastry, N., A.R. Pebley, and M. Zonta. 2002. “Neighborhood Definitions and the Spatial Dimension of Daily Life in Los Angeles.” Working Paper No. ccpr-033-04. California Center for Population Research, UCLA. Available online at Scholar
  27. Smith, N. 2000. “Scale.” Pp. 724–27 in The Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th ed., edited by R.J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, and M. Watts. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Taeuber, K.E. and A.F. Taeuber. 1965. Negroes in Cities: Residential Segregation and Neighborhood Change. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  29. Theil, H. 1972. Statistical Decomposition Analysis, Vol. 14. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  30. Timberlake, J.M. 2002. “Separate, But How Unequal? Ethnic Residential Strati cation, 1980 to 1990.” City and Community 1:251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tobler, W.R. 1979. “Smooth Pycnophylactic Interpolation for Geographical Regions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:519–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turner, M.A., S.L. Ross, G.C. Galster, and J. Yinger. 2002. “Discrimination in Metropolitan Housing Markets: National Results From Phase I HDS 2000” [Electronic version]. Available online at n/hds.html.Google Scholar
  33. White, M.J. 1983. “The Measurement of Spatial Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology 88:1008–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wong, D.W.S. 1993. “Spatial Indices of Segregation.” Urban Studies 30:559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. — 1997. “Spatial Dependency of Segregation Indices.” The Canadian Geographer 41:128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. — 1999. “Geostatistics as Measures of Spatial Segregation.” Urban Geography 20:635–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. — 2004. “Comparing Traditional and Spatial Segregation Measures: A Spatial Scale Perspective.” Urban Geography 25:66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu, X.B., and D.Z. Sui. 2001. “An Initial Exploration of a Lacunarity-Based Segregation Measure.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28:433–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yinger, J. 1995. Closed Doors, Opportunities Lost: The Continuing Costs of Housing Discrimination. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean F. Reardon
    • 1
  • Stephen A. Matthews
    • 2
  • David O’Sullivan
    • 3
    • 4
  • Barrett A. Lee
    • 2
  • Glenn Firebaugh
    • 2
  • Chad R. Farrell
    • 5
  • Kendra Bischoff
    • 6
  1. 1.School of EducationStanford UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Department of SociologyPennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.School of GeographyGeology
  4. 4.Environmental ScienceUniversity of AucklandNew Zealand
  5. 5.Department of SociologyUniversity of Alaska-AnchorageUSA
  6. 6.Department of SociologyStanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations