Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 741–761 | Cite as

Technological innovation and inequality in health

  • Sherry Glied
  • Adriana Lleras-Muney
Article

Abstract

The effect of education on health has been increasing over the past several decades. We hypothesize that this increasing disparity is related to health-related technical progress: more-educated people are the first to take advantage of technological advances that improve health. We test this hypothesis using data on disease-specific mortality rates for 1980 and 1990, and cancer registry data for 1973–1993. We estimate education gradients in mortality using compulsory schooling as a measure of education. We then relate these gradients to two measures of health-related innovation: the number of active drug ingredients available to treat a disease, and the rate of change in mortality from that disease. We find that more-educated individuals have a greater survival advantage in those diseases for which there has been more health-related technological progress.

Keywords

NBER Working Paper Linear Probability Model Coef Cients Drug Measure Education Gradient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. and J. Angrist. 1999. “How Large Are the Social Returns to Education? Evidence From Compulsory Schooling Laws.” NBER Working Paper No. 7444. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Ai, C. and E.C. Norton. 2003. “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models.” Economics Letters 80:123–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, S.G. 2001. “Technology and the Wage Structure.” Journal of Labor Economics 19:440–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angrist, J.D. and A.B. Krueger. 1991. “Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:979–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartel, A.P. and N. Sicherman. 1999. “Technological Change and Wages: An Interindustry Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 107:285–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bongers, I.M., J.B. van der Meer, J. van den Bos, and J.P. Mackenbach. 1997. “Socio-economic Differences in General Practitioner and Outpatient Specialist Care in the Netherlands: A Matter of Health Insurance?” Social Science and Medicine 44:1161–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, C.P. 1991. “Decision Making and Prescribing Patterns—A Literature Review.” Family Practice 8:276–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandra, A. and J. Skinner. 2003. “Geography and Racial Health Disparities.” NBER Working Paper No. 9513. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Constantino, J.P., M.H. Gail, D. Pee, S. Anderson, C.K. Redmond, J. Benichou, and H.S. Wieand. 1999. “Validation Studies for Models Projecting the Risk of Invasive and Total Breast Cancer Incidence.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 91:1541–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham, W.E., L.E. Markson, R.M. Andersen, S.H. Crystal, J.A. Fleishman, C. Golin, A. Gifford, H.H. Liu, T.T. Nakazono, S.C. Morton, S.A. Bozzette, M.F. Shapiro, and N.S. Wenger. 2000. “Prevalence and Predictors of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Use in Persons With HIV Infection.” U.S. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 25:115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cutler, D., A. Deaton, and A. Lleras-Muney. 2006. “The Determinants of Mortality.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20:97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cutler, D. and E. Meara. 2001. “Changes in the Age Distribution of Mortality Over the 20th Century.” NBER Working Paper No. 8556. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Cutler, D., A.B. Rosen, and S. Vijan. 2006. “The Value of Medical Spending in the United States, 1960–2000.” New England Journal of Medicine 355:920–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Walque, D. 2004. “How Does the Impact of an HIV/AIDS Information Campaign Vary With Educational Attainment? Evidence From Rural Uganda.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3289. World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elo, I.T. and S.H. Preston. 1996. “Educational Differentials in Mortality: United States, 1979–85.” Social Science and Medicine 42:47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuchs, V.R. 1982. “Time Preference and Health: An Exploratory Study.” Pp. 93–120 in Economic Aspects of Health, edited by V. Fuchs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fuchs, V.R. and H. Sox. 2001. “Physicians’ Views of the Relative Importance of Thirty Medical Innovations.” Health Affairs 20(5):30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldin, C. and L. Katz. 2003. “Mass Secondary Schooling and the State.” NBER Working Paper No. 10075. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Grossman, M. 2000. “The Human Capital Model.” Pp. 347–408 in Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1A, edited by A.J. Culyer and J.P. Newhouse. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, B. and B. Khan. 2003. “Adoption of New Technology.” NBER Working Paper No. 9730. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Kaufmann, M., W. Jonat, R. Blamey, J. Cuzick, M. Namer, I. Fogelman, J.C. de Haes, M. Schumacher, W. Sauerbrei, on behalf of the Zoladex. Early Breast Cancer Research Association (ZEBRA) Trialists’ Group. 2003. “Survival Analyses From the ZEBRA Study. Goserelin (Zoladex) Versus CMF in Premenopausal Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer.” European Journal of Cancer 39:1711–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitagwa, E. and P. Hauser. 1973. Differential Mortality in the United States: A Study in Socioeconomic Epidemiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kunst, A.E., V. Bos, O. Andersen, J.-K. Borgan, M. Cardano, G. Costa, S. Harding, Ö. Hemström, R. Layte, E. Regidor, A. Reid, P. Santana, T. Valkonen, and J.P. Mackenbach. 2002. “Monitoring of Trends in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality: Experiences From a European Project.” Paper presented to the IUSSP seminar on “Determinants of Diverging Trends in Mortality,” Rostock, Germany, June 19–21.Google Scholar
  24. Link, B.G., M.E. Northridge, J.C. Phelan, and M.L. Ganz. 1998. “Social Epidemiology and the Fundamental Cause Concept: On the Structuring of Effective Cancer Screens by Socioeconomic Status.” Milbank Quarterly 76:375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Link, B.G. and J. Phelan. 1995. “Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Disease.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 35(extra issue):80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lleras-Muney, A. 2002. “Were State Laws on Compulsory Education Effective? An Analysis From 1915 to 1939.” Journal of Law and Economics 45(2, part 1):401–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. —. 2005. “The Relationship Between Education and Adult Mortality in the U.S.” Review of Economic Studies 72(1):189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lleras-Muney, A. and F.R. Lichtenberg. 2002. “The Effect of Education on Medical Technology Adoption: Are the More Educated More Likely to Use New Drugs?” NBER Working Paper No. 9185. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Mackenback, J.P., V. Bos, O. Anderson, M. Cardano, G. Costa, S. Harding, A. Reid, Ö. Hemström, T. Valkonen, and A.E. Kunst. 2003. “Widening Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality in Six Western European Countries.” International Journal of Epidemiology 32:830–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Margo, R.A. and T.A. Finegan. 1996. “Compulsory Schooling Legislation and School Attendance in Turn-of-The Century America: A ‘Natural Experiment.’” Economics Letters 53:103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, S.P. 2000. “Diverging Fertility Among U.S. Women Who Delay Childbearing Past Age 30.” Demography 37:523–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meara, E. 2001. “Why Is Health Related to Socio-economic Status?” NBER Working Paper No. 8231. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  33. Moretti, E. and L. Lochner. 2004. “The Effect of Education on Criminal Activity: Evidence From Prison Inmates, Arrests and Self-Reports.” American Economic Review 94:155–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murphy, K. and R. Topel, eds. 2003. Measuring the Gains From Medical Research: An Economic Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. National Center for Health Statistics. Multiple years. Data File Documentations, Mortality Data, Multiple Cause-of-Death Public Use Data Files, (machine readable data file and documentation, CD-ROM Series). National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
  36. —. 1968–1988. Data File Documentations, Compressed Mortality Files, 2000 (machine readable data file and documentation, CD-ROM Series, Series Number 20. No. 2A), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
  37. National Science Board. 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators—2000. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind00/pdf/append/c8/at08.pdf.Google Scholar
  38. Nelson, R.R. and E.S. Phelps. 1966. “Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion and Economics Growth.” American Economic Review 56:69–75.Google Scholar
  39. Nickell, S. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models With Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 49:1417–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nordhaus, W. 2002. Pp. 9–40 in Measuring the Gains From Medical Research: An Economic Approach, edited by K. Murphy and R. Topel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Oreopoulos, P. 2003. “Do Dropouts Drop Out Too Soon? International Evidence From Changes in School Leaving Laws.” NBER Working Paper No. 10155. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  42. Pappas, G., S. Queen, W. Hadden, and G. Fisher. 1993. “The Increasing Disparity in Mortality Between Socioeconomic Groups in the United States, 1960 and 1986.” New England Journal of Medicine 329:103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phelan, J.C. and B.G. Link. 2005. “Controlling Disease and Creating Disparities: A Fundamental Cause Perspective.” Journals of Gerontology Series—Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences 60(Spec. No. 2):27–33.Google Scholar
  44. Phelan, J.C., B.G. Link, A. Diez-Roux, I. Kawachi, and B. Levin. 2004. “Fundamental Causes of Social Inequalities in Mortality: A Test of the Theory.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45:265–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Preston, S.H. and M.R. Haines. 1991. Fatal Years: Child Mortality in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Riman, T., P.W. Dickman, S. Nilsson, N. Correia, H. Nordlinder, C.M. Magnusson, and I.R. Persson. 2002. “Risk Factors for Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results From a Swedish Case-Control Study.” American Journal of Epidemiology 156:363–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rutstein, D.D., W. Berenberg, T.C. Chalmers, C.G. Child, A.P. Fishman, and E.B. Perrin. 1976. “Measuring the Quality of Medical Care. A Clinical Method.” New England Journal of Medicine 294:582–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salvanes, K.G., K. Vaage, and A. Aakvik. 2003. “Measuring Heterogeneity in the Returns to Education in Norway Using Education Reforms.” CEPR Discussion Paper 4088. Center for Economic and Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  49. Sateren, W.B., E.L. Trimble, J. Abrams, O. Brawley, N. Breen, L. Ford, M. McCabe, R. Kaplan, M. Smith, R. Ungerleider, and M.C. Christian. 2002. “How Sociodemographics, Presence of Oncology Specialists, and Hospital Cancer Programs Affect Accrual to Cancer Treatment Trials.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 20:2109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schmidt, S. 1996. “School Quality, Compulsory Education Laws, and the Growth of American High School Attendance, 1915–1935.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Economics, MIT.Google Scholar
  51. Van Doorslaer, E., X. Koolman, and A.M. Jones. 2004. “Explaining Income-Related Inequalities in Doctor Utilisation in Europe.” Health Economics13:629–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wozniak, G.D. 1984. “The Adoption of Interrelated Innovations: A Human Capital Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 66:70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherry Glied
    • 1
  • Adriana Lleras-Muney
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health Policy and Management Department of Economics, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Economics Department and Woodrow Wilson SchoolPrinceton

Personalised recommendations