Skip to main content
Log in

Pore Geometry as a Limiting Factor for Anion Diffusion in Argillaceous Rocks

  • Published:
Clays and Clay Minerals

Abstract

Several barrier types are envisaged to minimize the release of radionuclides from waste matrices into groundwater. In a number of countries argillaceous rocks make up the natural barrier that will isolate radioactive substances from the aquifer. The present study addresses the influence of pore geometry as a limiting factor for anion diffusion in argillaceous rocks. Irrespective of the pore core size, anion diffusion can be limited by the pore-size opening, i.e. if the pore opening is so narrow that the electric double layers overlap and form a barrier to anions irrespective of the pore size. This so-called ‘bottleneck effect’ limits the anion diffusion. The present study extends previous investigations that focused on other factors which limit anion diffusion, e.g. mineralogy or interlayer equivalent pores. The existence of bottleneck pores was confirmed by effective tortuosity calculations and retention-potential measurements using mercury intrusion porosimetry. On the basis of two different core samples from argillaceous rocks from Switzerland, Opalinus Clay and Helvetic Marl, this work shows evidence of the existence of bottleneck pores. The larger permanent anion exclusion in the Helvetic Marl sample compared to the Opalinus Clay sample can be explained by the larger retention potential and larger effective tortuosity of the Helvetic Marl rock, which indicates more pores with bottleneck effects than is the case for the Opalinus Clay rock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, S. (2008) Geochemical research: A key building block for nuclear waste disposal safety cases. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 102, 174–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelt, H., Holtzclaw, K., and Pratt, P. (1975) Effect of anion exclusion on the movement of chloride through soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 39, 264–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeyens, B. and Bradbury, M. H. (2004) Cation exchange capacity measurements on illite using the sodium and cesium isotope dilution technique: effects of the index cation, electrolyte concentration and competition: modeling. Clays and Clay Minerals, 52, 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, G.H. and de Haan, F.A.M. (1979) Anion exclusion in soil. Pp. 233–257 in: Soil Chemistry: B. Physico-Chemical Models (G.H. Bolt, editor). Developments in Soil Science, vol. 5B, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chagneau, A.L., Tournassat, C., Steefel, C.I., Bourg, I.C., Gaboreau, S.P., Esteve, I.N., Kupcik, T., Claret, F., and Schafer, T. (2015) Complete restriction of 36Cl- diffusion by celestite precipitation in densely compacted illite. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2, 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.-W. and Oscarson, D. (1996) Diffusive transport through compacted Na-and Ca-bentonite. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 22, 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descostes, M., Blin, V., Bazer-Bachi, F., Meier, P., Grenut, B., Radwan, J., Schlegel, M.L., Buschaert, S., Coelho, D., and Tevissen, E. (2008) Diffusion of anionic species in Callovo-Oxfordian argillites and Oxfordian limestones (Meuse/Haute-Marne, France). Applied Geochemistry, 23, 655–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S. (1970) Pore size distributions in clays. Clays and Clay Minerals, 18, 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flury, M. and Gimmi, T. F. (2002) Section 6.2 Solute diffusion. In: Miscible solute transport. Pp. 1353–1351 in: Methods of Soil Analysis, 4, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaboreau, S., Robinet, J.C., and Prêt, D. (2016) Optimization of pore-network characterization of a compacted clay material by TEM and FIB/SEM imaging. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 224, 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesche, H. (2006) Mercury porosimetry: a general (practical) overview. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 23, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimmi, T. and Fernández, A.M. (2017) Physical characterisation of pores and pore water of samples from the Schlattingen borehole. Technical Report NAB 16-71. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grambow, B. (2008) Mobile fission and activation products in nuclear waste disposal. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 102, 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, K.B. (1996) Measurement of Diffusive Properties of Intact Rock. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemes, S., Desbois, G., Urai, J.L., Schróppel, B., and Schwarz, J.-O. (2015) Multi-scale characterization of porosity in Boom Clay (HADES-level, Mol, Belgium) using a combination of X-ray μ-CT, 2D BIB-SEM and FIB-SEM tomography. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 208, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houben, M., Desbois, G., and Urai, J.L. (2013) Pore morphology and distribution in the shaly facies of Opalinus Clay (Mont Terri, Switzerland): Insights from representative 2D BIB-SEM investigations on mm to nm scale. Applied Clay Science, 71, 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsube, T., Melnyk, T., and Hume, J. (1986) Pore structure from diffusion in granitic rocks, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kestin, J., Khalifa, H.E., and Correia, R.J. (1981) Tables of the dynamic and kinematic viscosity of aqueous NaCl solutions in the temperature range 20-150°C and the pressure range 0.1-35 MPa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 10, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matusewicz, M., Pirkkalainen, K., Liljestróm, V., Suuronen, J.P., Root, A., Muurinen, A., Serimaa, R., and Olin, M. (2013) Microstructural investigation of calcium montmorillonite. Clay Minerals, 48, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazurek, M., Waber, N., Máder, U., Gimmi, T., de Haller, A., and Koroleva, M. (2012) Geochemical synthesis for the Effingen Member in boreholes at Oftringen, Gósgen and Kúttigen. Technical Report NTB 12-07. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, T. and Skeet, A. (1986) An improved technique for the determination of rock porosity. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 23, 1068–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, H. (2005) Topical report on the effect of the ionic strength on the diffusion accessible porosity of Boom Clay. SCK CEN, Mol, Belgium, report SCK CEN-ER-02.

  • Moro, F. and Bóhni, H. (2002) Ink-bottle effect in mercury intrusion porosimetry of cement-based materials. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 246, 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muurinen, A. (1994) Diffusion of anions and cations in compacted sodium bentonite. VTT Publications 168, echnical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmatz, J., Vrolijk, P., and Urai, J. (2010) Clay smear in normal fault zones - The effect of multilayers and clay cementation in water-saturated model experiments. Journal of Structural Geology, 32, 1834–1849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Pivonka, P., Jungnickel, C., and Fityus, S. (2004) Theoretical analysis of anion exclusion and diffusive transport through platy-clay soils. Transport in Porous Media, 57, 251–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., Davy, C.A., Bertier, P., and Troadec, D. (2016) Understanding fluid transport through claystones from their 3D nanoscopic pore network. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 228, 64–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tevissen, E., Soler, J., Montarnal, P., Gautschi, A., and Van Loon, L.R. (2004) Comparison between in situ and laboratory diffusion studies of HTO and halides in Opalinus Clay from the Mont Terri. Radiochimica Acta/International Journal for Chemical Aspects of Nuclear Science and Technology, 92, 781–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M.L., McBride, J.F., and Horton, R. (1985) Effects of drying treatments on porosity of soil materials. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 49, 1360–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tournassat, C. and Appelo, C.A.J. (2011) Modelling approaches for anion-exclusion in compacted Na-bentonite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 75, 3698–3710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tournassat, C., Bourg, I.C., Holmboe, M., Sposito, G., and Steefel, C.I. (2016a) Molecular dynamics simulations of anion exclusion in clay interlayer nanopores. Clays and Clay Minerals, 64, 374–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tournassat, C., Gaboreau, S., Robinet, J.-C., Bourg, I.C., and Steefel, C.I. (2016b) Impact of microstructure on anion exclusion in compacted clay media. Pp. 137–149 in: Filling the Gaps — From Microscopic Pore Structures to Transport Properties in Shales (T. Scháfer, R. Dohrmann, and H.C. Greenwell, editors). Workshop Lectures Series, 21. The Clay Minerals Society, Chantilly, Virginia, USA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Brakel, J. and Heertjes, P.M. (1974) Analysis of diffusion in macroporous media in terms of a porosity, a tortuosity and a constrictivity factor. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 17, 1093–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, L.R. and Soler, J.M. (2004) 36CI-, 125I- and 22Na+ in Opalinus Clay: Effect of Confining Pressure, Sample Orientation, Sample Depth and Temperature. Nagra Technischer Bericht NTB 03-07. Paul-Scherrer-Institut, PSI. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, L.R., Glaus, M.A., and Múller, W. (2007) Anion exclusion effects in compacted bentonites: Towards a better understanding of anion diffusion. Applied Geochemistry, 22, 2536–2552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilks, P. and Miller, N. (2007) Evaluation of experimental protocols for characterizing diffusion in sedimentary rocks. Nuclear Waste Management Organization Report TR-2007-11. Nuclear Waste Management Organization, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrolijk, P.J., Urai, J.L., and Kettermann, M. (2016) Clay smear: Review of mechanisms and applications. Journal of Structural Geology, 86, 95–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw, N. and Cassan, J. (1979) Oil recovery efficiency and the rock-pore properties of some sandstone reservoirs. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 27, 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw, N. and McKellar, M. (1981) Mercury porosimetry and the interpretation of pore geometry in sedimentary rocks and artificial models. Powder Technology, 29, 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, E.W. (1921a) The dynamics of capillary flow. Physical Review, 17, 273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, E.W. (1921b) Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 7, 115–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigger, C. and Van Loon, L.R. (2017) Importance of interlayer equivalent pores for anion diffusion in clay-rich sedimentary rocks. Environmental Science & Technology, 51, 1998–2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigger, C., Gimmi, T., Muller, A.C.A., and Van Loon, L.R. (2018) The influence of small pores on the anion transport properties of natural argillaceous rocks - a pore size distribution investigation of Opalinus Clay and Helvetic Marl. Applied Clay Science, 156, 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Wigger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wigger, C., Plöze, M. & Van Loon, L.R. Pore Geometry as a Limiting Factor for Anion Diffusion in Argillaceous Rocks. Clays Clay Miner. 66, 329–338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2018.064101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2018.064101

Key Words

Navigation