Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping Soil Particle-Size Fractions Using Additive Log-Ratio (ALR) and Isometric Log-Ratio (ILR) Transformations and Proximally Sensed Ancillary Data

  • Published:
Clays and Clay Minerals

Abstract

Together, the three particle size fractions (PSFs) of clay, silt, and sand are the most fundamental soil properties because the relative abundance influences the physical, chemical, and biological activities in soil. Unfortunately, determining PSFs requires a laboratory method which is time-consuming. One way to add value is to use digital soil mapping, which relies on empirical models, such as multiple linear regression (MLR), to couple ancillary data to PSFs. This approach does not account for the special requirements of compositional data. Here, ancillary data were coupled, via MLR modelling, to additive log-ratio (ALR) or isometric log-ratio (ILR) transformations of the PSFs to meet these requirements. These three approaches (MLR vs. ALR-MLR and ILR-MLR) were evaluated along with the use of different ancillary data that included proximally sensed gamma-ray spectrometry, electromagnetic induction, and elevation data. In addition, how the prediction might be improved was examined using ancillary data that was measured on transects and was compared to data interpolated from transects spaced far apart. Although the ALR-MLR approach did not produce significantly better results, it predicted soil PSFs that summed to 100 and had the advantage of interpreting the ancillary data relative to the original coordinates (i.e. clay, silt, and sand). For the prediction of PSFs at various depths, all ancillary data were useful. Elevation and gamma-ray data were slightly better for topsoil and elevation and electromagnetic (EM) data were better for subsoil prediction. In addition, a smaller transect spacing (26 m) and number of samples (9–16) might be adopted for mapping soil PSFs and soil texture across the study field. The ALR-MLR approach can be applied elsewhere to map the spatial distribution of clay minerals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J. (1990) Relative variation diagrams for describing patterns of compositional variability. Mathematical Geology, 22, 487–511.

  • Brus, D.J. (2015) Balanced sampling: a versatile sampling approach for statistical soil surveys. Geoderma, 253, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brus, D.J. and Saby, N.P.A. (2016) Approximating the variance of estimated means for systematic random sampling, illustrated with data of the French Soil Monitoring Network. Geoderma, 279, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, S., Triantafilis, J., Odeh, I.O.A., and Subansinghe, R. (2012) Digital soil mapping of compositional particle-size fractions using proximal and remotely sensed ancillary data. Geophysics, 77, WB201–WB211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Z.L. and Oliver, M.A. (2005) Exploring the spatial relations between soil physical properties and apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma, 128, 354–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockx, L., Van Meirvenne, M., Vitharana, U.W.A., Verbeke, L.P.C., Simpson, D., Saey, T., and Van Coillie, F.M.B. (2009) Extracting topsoil information from EM38DD sensor data using a neural network approach. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73, 2051–2058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Benedetto, D., Castrignano, A., Sollitto, D., Modugno, F., Buttafuoco, G., and lo Papa, G. (2012) Integrating geophysical and geostatistical techniques to map the spatial variation of clay. Geoderma, 171, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gruijter, J.J., Walvoort, D.J.J., and van Gaans, P.F.M. (1997) Continuous soil maps — a fuzzy set approach to bridge the gap between aggregation levels of process and distribution models. Geoderma, 77, 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domsch, H. and Giebel, A. (2004) Estimation of soil textural features from soil electrical conductivity recorded using the EM38. Precision Agriculture, 5, 389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, J.A. and Brevik, E.C. (2014) The use of electromagnetic induction techniques in soils studies. Geoderma, 223, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egozcue, J.J., Barceló-Vidal, C., Martin-Fernández, J.A., Jarauta-Bragulet, E., Díaz-Barrero, J.L., and Mateu-Figueras, G. (2011) Elements of simplicial linear algebra and geometry. Pp. 139–157 in: Composition Data Analysis: Theory and Applications (V. Pawlowsky-Glahn and A. Buccianti, editors). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119976462, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egozcue, J.J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Mateu-Figueras, G., and Barceló-Vidal, C. (2003) Isometric log ratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Mathematical Geology, 35, 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., and Reimann, C. (2009) Principal component analysis for compositional data with outliers. Environmetrics, 20, 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasty R.L., Holman, P.B., and Blanchard, Y.B. (1991) Transportable calibration pads for ground and airborne gamma-ray spectrometers. Geological Survey of Canada, 90, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Lark, R.M., Robinson, D.A., Lebron, I., Keith, A.M., Rawlins, B., and Triantafilis, J. (2014) Scope to predict soil properties at within-field scale from small samples using proximally sensed γ-ray spectrometer and EM induction data. Geoderma, 232, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, C.B., Yule, I.J., Eastwood, C.R., Shepherd, T.G., and Arnold, G. (2004) Rapid identification of soil textural and management zones using electromagnetic induction sensing of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 42, 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil, K. and Schmidhalter, U. (2012) Characterisation of soil texture variability using the apparent soil electrical conductivity at a highly variable site. Computational Geosciences, 39, 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Subasinghe, R., and Triantafilis, J. (2014) Mapping particle-size fractions as a composition using additive log-ratio transformation and ancillary data. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 78, 1967–1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Barrett-Lennard, E.G., Kilminster, T., Sinnott, A., and Triantafilis, J. (2015) An error budget for mapping field-scale soil salinity at various depths using different sources of ancillary data. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79, 1717–1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S.I., Lee, K.P., Lee, D.S., and Powers, S.E. (2002) Models for estimating soil particle-size distributions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 1143–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, R. (2002) The Australian Soil Classification. Australian Soil and Land Survey Handbooks. Series 4, CSIRO Publishing, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, W.K., Kitchen, N.R., Sudduth, K.A., and Anderson, S.H. (2006) Spatial characteristics of claypan soil properties in an agricultural field. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 1387–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark, R.M. and Bishop T.F.A. (2007) Cokriging particle size fractions of the soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 58, 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark, R.M., Cullis, B.R. and Welham, S.J. (2006) On spatial prediction of soil properties in the presence of a spatial trend: The empirical best linear unbiased predictor (E-BLUP) with REML. European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 787–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L.I.K. (1989) A condordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45, 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny, B. and McBratney, A.B. (2006) Latin hypercube sampling as a tool for digital soil mapping. Developments in Soil Science, 31, 153–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B., and Whelan, B.M. (1999) Computer Program for Variogram Estimation and Spatial Prediction with Error. Australian Centre for Precision Agriculture Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odeh, I.O.A., Todd, A.J., and Triantafilis, J. (2003) Spatial prediction of soil particle-size fractions as compositional data. Soil Science, 168, 501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. and Egozcue, J.J. (2016) Spatial analysis of compositional data: A historical review. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 164, 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, H., Wunderlich, T., Attia al Hagrey, S., and Rabbel, W. (2012) Characterization of some middle European soil textures by gamma spectrometry. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 175, 651–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pracilio, G., Adams, M.L. Smettem, K.R.J., and Harper, R.J. (2006) Determination of spatial distribution patterns of clay and plant available potassium contents in surface soils at the farm scale using high resolution gamma ray spectrometry. Plant and Soil, 282, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayment, G.E. and Higginson, F.R. (1992) Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods. Inkata Press, Port Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spadoni, M. and Voltaggio, M. (2013) Contribution of gamma ground spectrometry to the textural characterization and mapping of floodplain sediments. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 125, 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth, K.A., Kitchen, N.R. Myers, D.B., and Drummond, S.T. (2010) Mapping depth to argillic soil horizons using apparent electrical conductivity. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 15, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, M.E. (editor) (1999) Handbook of Soil Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantafilis, J., Huckel, A.I., and Odeh, I.O.A. (2001) Comparison of statistical prediction methods for estimating field-scale clay content using different combinations of ancillary variables. Soil Science, 166, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafilis, J., Gibbs, I., and Earl, N. (2013) Digital soil pattern recognition in the lower Namoi valley using numerical clustering of gamma-ray spectrometry data. Geoderma, 192, 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscarra Rossel, R.A., Taylor, H.J., and McBratney, A.B. (2007) Multivariate calibration of hyperspectral γ-ray energy spectra for proximal soil sensing. European Journal of Soil Science, 58, 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitharana, U.W.A., Van Meirvenne, M., Simpson, D., Cockx, L., and De Baerdemaeker, J. (2008) Key soil and topographic properties to delineate potential management classes for precision agriculture in the European loess area. Geoderma, 143, 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. and Oliver, M.A. (1992) Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties. Journal of Soil Science, 43, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. and Oliver, M.A. (2007) Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.G. and Hoey, D. (1987) The use of electromagnetic induction to detect the spatial variability of the salt and clay contents of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 25, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P.R. and Baker, D.E. (1990) Soils and agricultural land suitability of the wet tropical coast on north Queensland: Ingham area. Land Resources Bulletin, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Queensland Government Technical Report, 146 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Triantafilis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muzzamal, M., Huang, J., Nielson, R. et al. Mapping Soil Particle-Size Fractions Using Additive Log-Ratio (ALR) and Isometric Log-Ratio (ILR) Transformations and Proximally Sensed Ancillary Data. Clays Clay Miner. 66, 9–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2017.064074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2017.064074

Key Words

Navigation