Abstract
Bentonites are commonly used as chemical containment barriers to minimize liquid flow and contaminant transport. However, chemicals can adversely affect bentonite performance to the extent that modified bentonites have been developed to improve chemical resistance relative to traditional (unmodified) bentonites. The present study focused on the diffusion of potassium chloride (KCl) through a bentonite-polymer composite, or BPC, that was known to behave as a semipermeable membrane. Specifically, the effective diffusion coefficients, D*, for chloride (Cl−) and potassium (K+) were measured and correlated with previously measured membrane efficiency coefficients, ω, for the BPC. The values of D* at steady-state for chloride (\(D_{\rm{ss},Cl^-}^*\)) and potassium (\(D_{\rm{ss},K^+}^*\)) decreased as the ω values increased. The decrease in \(D_{\rm{ss},Cl^-}^*\) and \(D_{\rm{ss},K^+}^*\) was approximately a linear function of (1 − ω), which is consistent with previous research performed on unmodified Na-bentonite contained within a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL). In contrast to the previous GCL tests, however, \(D_{\rm{ss},Cl^-}^*\) values for the BPC generally were greater than the \(D_{\rm{ss},K^+}^*\) values, and the differences between \(D_{\rm{ss},Cl^-}^*\) and \(D_{\rm{ss},K^+}^*\) decreased as KCl concentration increased. The apparent discrepancy between \(D_{\rm{ss},Cl^-}^*\) and \(D_{\rm{ss},K^+}^*\) is consistent with excess sodium (Na+) in the BPC prior to testing and the requirement for electroneutrality during testing. Also, despite an apparent linear trend in diffusive mass flux for K+, lack of agreement between the ratio of the diffusive mass flux of K+ relative to that for Cl− as required on the basis of electroneutrality at steady state suggested that steadystate diffusive mass flux for K+ had probably not been achieved due to continual K+-for-Na+ cation exchange. Nonetheless, the excess Na+ and bentonite modification did not affect the fundamental correlation between D* and ω, which requires that D* approaches zero as ω approaches unity (D* → 0 as ω → 1).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashmawy, A., Darwish, E., Sotelo, N., and Muhammad, N. (2002) Hydraulic performance of untreated and polymer-treated bentonite in inorganic landfill leachates. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 546–552.
Boels, D. and van der Wal, K. (1999) Trisoplast: New developments in soil protection. Sardinia 99, CISA, Caligari, Italy, pp. 77–84.
Bohnhoff, G. (2012) Membrane behavior, diffusion, and compatibility of a polymerized bentonite for containment barrier applications. PhD dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Bohnhoff, G. and Shackelford, C. (2013) Improving membrane performance via bentonite polymer nanocomposite. Applied Clay Science, 86, 83–98.
Christman, M., Benson, C., and Edil, T. (2002) Geophysical evaluation of annular well seals. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 22, 104–112.
Crank, J. (1975). The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
Di Emidio, G. (2010) Hydraulic and chemico-osmotic performance of polymer treated clay. PhD dissertation, University of Ghent, Belgium.
Di Emidio, G., van Impe, P., and Mazzieri, F. (2010) A polymer enhanced clay for impermeable geosynthetic clay liners. Sixth International Conference on Environmental Geotechnics, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, India, pp. 963–967.
Di Emidio, G., van Impe, P., and Flores, V. (2011) Advances in geosynthetic clay liners: polymer enhanced clays. Geo- Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (J. Han and D. Alzamora, editors), ASCE, Reston, Virginia, USA, pp. 1931–1940.
Dominijanni, A. and Manassero, M. (2012a) Modelling the swelling and osmotic properties of clay soils. Part I: The phenomenological approach. International Journal of Engineering Science, 51, 32–50.
Dominijanni, A. and Manassero, M. (2012b) Modelling the swelling and osmotic properties of clay soils. Part II: The physical approach. International Journal of Engineering Science, 51, 51–73.
Dominijanni, A., Manassero, M., and Puma, S. (2013) Coupled chemical-hydraulic-mechanical behaviour of bentonites. Geotechnique, 63, 191–205.
Estornell, P. and Daniel, D.E. (1992) Hydraulic conductivity of three geosynthetic clay liners. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 118, 1592–1606.
Evans, J. (1994) Hydraulic conductivity of vertical cutoff walls. Pp. 79–94 in: Hydraulic Conductivity and Waste Contaminant Transport in Soil (D.E. Daniel and S. Trautwein, editors), ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gleason, M., Daniel, D., and Eykholt, G. (1997) Calcium and sodium bentonite for hydraulic containment applications. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123, 438–445.
Heller, H. and Keren, R. (2003) Anionic polyacrylamide polymer adsorption by pyrophyllite and montmorillonite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 334–339.
Jo, H., Benson, C., Shackelford, C., Lee, J-M., and Edil, T. (2005) Long-term hydraulic conductivity of a geosynthetic clay liner permeated with inorganic salt solutions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131, 405–417.
Kajita, L. (1997) An improved contaminant resistant clay for environmental clay liner applications. Clays and Clay Minerals, 45, 609–617.
Kang, J. and Shackelford, C. (2009) Clay membrane testing using a flexible-wall cell under closed-system boundary conditions. Applied Clay Science, 44, 43–58.
Kang, J. and Shackelford, C. (2011) Consolidation enhanced membrane behavior of a geosynthetic clay liner. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29, 544–556.
Kolstad, D., Benson, C., and Edil, T. (2004) Hydraulic conductivity and swell of non-prehydrated geosynthetic clay liners permeated with multispecies inorganic solutions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130, 1236–1249.
Lagaly, G., Ogawa, M., and Dékány, I. (2006) Clay mineral organic interactions. Pp. 309–377 in: Handbook of Clay Science (F. Bergaya, B.K.G. Theng, and G. Lagaly, editors). Developments in Clay Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Malusis, M. and Shackelford, C. (2002a) Chemico-osmotic efficiency of a geosynthetic clay liner. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128, 97–106.
Malusis, M. and Shackelford, C. (2002b) Coupling effects during steady-state solute diffusion through a semipermeable clay membrane. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 1312–1319.
Malusis, M., Shackelford, C., and Olsen, H. (2001) A laboratory apparatus to measure chemico-osmotic efficiency coefficients for clay soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 24, 229–242.
Manassero, M. and Dominijanni, A. (2003) Modelling the osmosis effect on solute migration through porous media. Geotechnique, 53, 481–492.
Malusis, M., Kang, J., and Shackelford, C. (2013) Influence of membrane behavior on solute diffusion through GCLs. Pp. 267–242 in: Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics (M. Manassero, A. Dominijanni, S. Foti, and G. Musso, editors). CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
Malusis, M., Kang, J., and Shackelford, C. (2014) Restricted salt diffusion in a geosynthetic clay liner. Environmental Geotechnics, 2, 68–77.
Mazzieri, F. (2011) Impact of desiccation and cation exchange on the hydraulic conductivity of factory-prehydrated GCLs. Pp. 976–985 in: GeoFrontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (J. Han and D. Alzamora, editors). ASCE, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Mazzieri, F., Di Emidio, G., and Van Impe, P. (2010a) Diffusion of calcium chloride in a modified bentonite: impact on osmotic efficiency and hydraulic conductivity. Clays and Clay Minerals, 58, 351–363.
Mazzieri, F., Pasqualini, E., and Di Emidio, G. (2010b) Migration of heavy metals through conventional and factory-prehydrated GCL materials. Pp. 960–963 in: Sixth International Conference on Environmental Geotechnics. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, India.
Muzny, C., Butler, B., Hanley, H., Tsvetkov, F., and Peiffer, D. (1996) Clay platelet dispersion in a polymer matrix. Materials Letters, 28, 379–384.
Onikata, M., Kondo, M., and Kamon, M. (1996) Development and characterization of a multiswellable bentonite. Pp. 587–590 in: 2nd International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics (M. Kamon, editor), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Onikata, M., Kondo, M., Hayashi, N., and Yamanaka, S. (1999) Complex formation of cation-exchanged montmorillonites with propylene carbonate: Osmotic swelling in aqueous electrolyte solutions. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47, 672–677.
Scalia, J. (2012) Bentonite-polymer composites for containment applications. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Scalia, J., Benson, C., Edil, T., Bohnhoff, G., and Shackelford, C. (2011) Geosynthetic clay liners containing bentonite polymer nanocomposite. Pp. 2001–2009 in: GeoFrontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (J. Han and D. Alzamora, editors). ASCE, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Scalia, J., Benson, C.H., Bohnhoff, G., Edil, T., and Shackelford, C. (2014) Long-term hydraulic conductivity of a bentonite-polymer composite permeated with aggressive inorganic solutions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140, 04013025-1-04013025-13.
Shackelford, C. (1991) Laboratory diffusion testing for waste disposal — A review. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 7, 177–217.
Shackelford, C. (2011) Membrane behavior in geosynthetic clay liners. Pp. 1961–1970 in: GeoFrontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (J. Han and D. Alzamora, editors). ASCE, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Shackelford, C. (2012) Membrane behavior of engineered clay barriers for geoenvironmental containment: State of the art. Pp. 3419–3428 in: GeoCongress 2012—State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering (R. Hryciw, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and N. Yesiller, editors). ASCE, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Shackelford, C. (2013) Membrane behavior in engineered bentonite-based containment barriers: State of the art. Pp. 45–60 in: Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics (M. Manassero, A. Dominijanni, S. Foti, and G. Musso, editors). CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
Shackelford, C., Benson, C., Katsumi, T., Edil, T., and Lin, L. (2000) Evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of GCLs permeated with non-standard liquids. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 18, 133–161.
Shackelford, C. and Daniel, D. (1991) Diffusion in saturated soil. 1. Background. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117, 467–484.
Shackelford, C. and Lee, J. (2003) The destructive role of diffusion on clay membrane behavior. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 186–196.
Shackelford, C. and Moore, S. (2013) Fickian diffusion of radionuclides for engineered containment barriers: Diffusion coefficients, porosities, and complicating issues. Engineering Geology, 152, 133–147.
Shackelford, C. and Sample-Lord, K. (2014) Hydraulic conductivity and compatibility of bentonite for hydraulic containment applications. Pp. 370–387 in: From Soil Behavior Fundamentals to Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering (M. Iskander, J. Garlanger, and M. Hussein, editors). Geotechnical Special Publication 233 honoring Roy E. Olson, ASCE, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Shackelford, C., Malusis, M., and Olsen, H. (2003) Clay membrane behavior for geoenvironmental containment. Pp. 767–774 in: Soil and Rock America Conference 2003, vol. 1 (P. Culligan, H. Einstein, and A. Whittle, editors). Verlag Glückauf GMBH, Essen, Germany.
Skagius, K. and Neretnieks, I. (1986) Porosities and diffusivities of some non-sorbing species in crystalline rocks. Water Resources Research, 22, 389–398.
Smith, J., Bartelt-Hunt, S., and Burns, S. (2003) Sorption and permeability of gasoline hydrocarbons in organobentonite porous media. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 96, 91–97.
Trauger, R. and Darlington, J. (2000) Next generation geosynthetic clay liners for improved durability and performance. 14th GRI Conference, Geosynthetic Institute, Folsom, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 255–267.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bohnhoff, G.L., Shackelford, C.D. Salt Diffusion Through a Bentonite-Polymer Composite. Clays Clay Miner. 63, 145–162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2015.0630301
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2015.0630301