Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 534–543 | Cite as

Surface Diffusion: Is It an Important Transport Mechanism in Compacted Clays?

  • Dennis W. Oscarson


Surface diffusion, or migration within the electrical double layer next to mineral surfaces, is often invoked as a significant contributor to the overall diffusion coefficient in compacted clays, particularly where model predictions underestimate measured diffusion coefficients. The potential for surface diffusion of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Na+ on three clays compacted to dry bulk densities of 1.25 and 1.60 Mg/m3 was examined. The clays were a bentonite, an illite/smectite, and a glacial lake clay (composed mainly of smectite, illite, kaolinite and quartz). The clays were saturated with a Na-Ca-Cl-dominated synthetic groundwater solution with an effective ionic strength of 220 mol/m3. Total intrinsic diffusion coefficients for the cations were determined from their steady-state flux through compacted clays, and apparent diffusion coefficients were obtained from the time-lag technique. Models of diffusive transport in compacted clays, based only on diffusion in the pore solution, adequately described the diffusion data for all clays and diffusants, and there was no need to invoke other transport mechanisms, like surface diffusion. The data indicate that surface diffusion is not a significant transport mechanism in compacted clays at least to a clay density of 1.60 Mg/m3.

Key Words

Compacted clays Surface diffusion Transport mechanism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberts, J. J., J. E. Pinder, E. Wurtz, and S. Lesnek. 1986. The effect of pH, solid phase, particle concentration and equilibrium time on the partition coefficients of curium on natural sediments. In Application of Distribution Coefficients to Radiological Assessment Models. T. H. Sibley and C. Myttenaere, eds. London: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 72–82.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, J. A., and K. A. Bond. 1992. Studies of the extent of surface diffusion in the migration of radionuclides through geological materials. Radiochim. Acta 58/59: 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradbury, M. H., A. Green, D. Lever, and I. G. Stephen. 1986. Diffusion and permeability based on sorption measurements in sandstone, anhydrite and upper magnesian limestone samples. UKAEA Report AERE-. 11995. United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, Oxfordshire, U.K.Google Scholar
  4. Carter, D. L., M. M. Mortland, and W. D. Kemper. 1986. Specific surface. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Par. 1. 2nd Ed. A. Klute, ed. Madison, Wisconsin: ASA and SSSA, 413–423.Google Scholar
  5. Chandratillake, M., W. E. Falck, and D. Read. 1992. CHEMVAL Project: Guide to the CHEMVAL Thermodynamic Database. U.K. DOE Report No. DOE/HMIP/ RR/92/094. 2. pp.Google Scholar
  6. Chang, K.-P., C.-N. Hsu, and H. Tamaki. 1993. Basic study of 137Cs sorption on soil. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 30: 1243–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho, W. J., D. W. Oscarson, M. N. Gray, and S. C. H. Cheung. 1993a. Influence of diffusant concentration on diffusion coefficients in clay. Radiochim. Acta 60: 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, W. J., D. W. Oscarson, and P. S. Hahn. 1993b. The measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients in compacted clays: An assessment of methods. Appl. Clay Sci. 8: 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conca, J. L., M. Apted, and R. Arthur. 1993. Aqueous diffusion in repository and backfill environments. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 294: 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crank, J. 1975. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd Ed. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frape, S. K., P. Fritz, and R. H. McNutt. 1984. Water-rock interaction and chemistry of groundwaters from the Canadian Shield. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48: 1617–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillham, R. W., and J. A. Cherry. 1982. Contaminant migration in saturated unconsolidated geologic deposits. In Recent Trends in Hydrology. T. N. Narasimhan, ed. GSA Special Pape. 189. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hancox, W. T., and K. Nuttall. 1991. The Canadian approach to safe, permanent disposal of nuclear fuel waste. Nucl. Eng. Design 129: 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hume, H. B. 1993. Apparatus and procedures for measuring diffusion and distribution coefficients in compacted clays. AECL Research Report, AECL-10981, COG-93-446. AECL Research, Chalk River, Ontario.Google Scholar
  15. Li, Y.-H., and S. Gregory. 1974. Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 38 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson, M. L. 1975. Soil Chemical Analysis-Advanced Course, 2nd Ed. Madison, Wisconsin: Published by the Author, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  17. Jahnke, F. M., and C. J. Radke. 1987. Electrolyte diffusion in compacted montmorillonite engineered barriers. In Coupled Processes Associated with Nuclear Waste Repositories. C.-F. Tsang, ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen, D. J., and C. J. Radke. 1988. Caesium and strontium diffusion through sodium montmorillonite at elevated temperature. J. Soil Sci. 39: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kemper, W. D. 1986. Solute diffusivity. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Par. 1. 2nd Ed. A. Klute, ed. Madison, Wisconsin: ASA and SSSA, 1007–1024.Google Scholar
  20. Kim, H.-T., T.-W. Suk, S.-H. Park, and C.-S. Lee. 1993. Diffusivities for ions through compacted Na-bentonite with varying dry bulk density. Waste Management 13: 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCall, D. W., and D. C. Douglass. 1965. The effect of ions on the self-diffusion of water. I. Concentration dependence. J. Phys. Chem. 69: 2001–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meier, H., E. Zimmerhackl, G. Zeitler, P. Menge, and W. Hecker. 1987. Influence of liquid/solid ratios in radionuclide migration studies. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 109: 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miyahara, K., T. Ashida, Y. Kohara, Y. Yusa, and N. Sasaki. 1991. Effect of bulk density on diffusion of cesium in compacted sodium bentonite. Radiochim. Acta 52/53: 293–297.Google Scholar
  24. Muurinen, A., J. Rantanen, and P. Penttilä-Hiltunen. 1985. Diffusion mechanisms of strontium, cesium and cobalt in compacted sodium bentonite. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.50: 617–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, D. W., and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney, eds. Madison Wisconsin: ASA and SSSA, 539–579.Google Scholar
  26. Nye, P. H. 1979. Diffusion of ions and uncharged solutes in soils and clays. Adv. Agron. 31: 225–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olsen, S. R., and W. D. Kemper. 1968. Movement of nutrients to plant roots. Adv. Agron. 20: 91–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oscarson, D. W. 1994. Comparison of measured and calculated diffusion coefficients for iodide in compacted clays. Clay Miner. 29: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oscarson, D. W., and D. A. Dixon. 1989. Elemental, min-eralogical, and pore-solution composition of selected Canadian clays. AECL Research Report, AECL-9891. AECL Research, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  30. Oscarson, D.W., D.A. Dixon, and M.N. Gray. 1990. Swelling capacity and permeability of an unprocessed and a processed bentonitic clay. Eng. Geol. 28: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oscarson, D. W., and H. B. Hume. 1993. On the smectite to illite reaction. AECL Research Report, AECL-10842. AECL Research, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Oscarson, D. W., H. B. Hume, and F. King. 1994. Sorption of cesium on compacted bentonite. Clays & Clay Miner. (in press).Google Scholar
  33. Oscarson, D. W., H. B. Hume, N. G. Sawatsky, and S. C. H. Cheung. 1992. Diffusion of iodide in compacted bentonite. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56: 1400–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rasmuson, A., and I. Neretnieks. 1983. Surface migration in sorption processes. SKB Technical Report 83-37, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  35. Robin, M. J. L., R. W. Gillham, and D. W. Oscarson. 1987. Diffusion of strontium and chloride in compacted clay-based materials. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 1102–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sawatsky, N. G., and D. W. Oscarson. 1991. Diffusion of technetium in dense bentonite under oxidizing and reducing conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55: 1261–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shainberg, I., and W. D. Kemper. 1966. Conductance of alkali cations in aqueous and alcoholic bentonite pastes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 30: 700–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skagius, K., and I. Neretnieks. 1985. Diffusion measurements of caesium and strontium in biotite gniess. SKB Technical Report 85-15, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  39. Staunton, S. 1986. The self-diffusion of sodium in soil: Factors affecting the surface mobility. J. Soil Sci. 37: 373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Staunton, S., and P. H. Nye. 1983. The self diffusion of sodium in a naturally aggregated soil. J. Soil Sci. 34: 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Schaik, J. C., W. D. Kemper, and S. R. Olsen. 1966. Contribution of adsorbed cations to diffusion in clay-water systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 30: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis W. Oscarson
    • 1
  1. 1.Whiteshell LaboratoriesAECL ResearchPinawaCanada

Personalised recommendations